Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Mechanical Bioreactor Detailed Design Review

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Mechanical Bioreactor Detailed Design Review"— Presentation transcript:

1 Mechanical Bioreactor Detailed Design Review
Amanda Castagnino Emily Adams Emily Wood Natalie Nold Simran Singh

2 Agenda Goals and Deliverables Updated Cell Chamber Design
PDMS Testing Results PDMS Stiffening Investigation PDMS Cell Culture Results Cell Culture Pugh Mechanical Strain Pugh & Actuator v. Motor Discussion Additional Test Plan: Heat Cure Testing Additional Test Plan: Cellular Response to Strain Risk Assessment Update Bill of Materials Update MSD II Project Plan Agenda

3 PHASE IV GOALS PHASE IV DELIVERABLES
Analyze testing related to the properties and cell compatibility of PDMS. Investigate unexpected stiffening of PDMS in the incubator. Choose the best options for mechanical strain application. 3-D print a pilot mold and use that mold to cast the first PDMS cell culture chamber. Create plans for building and testing in the MSD II phase. PHASE IV DELIVERABLES Pilot PDMS mold of cell chamber. Mechanical Strain Pugh Analysis Cell Type Pugh Analysis Updated Risk Assessment Updated Bill of Materials MSD II Project Plan

4 First Chamber Mold Design

5 Chamber Mold Design Update

6 Side by Side Comparison

7 PDMS Testing Results

8 Data Collected This is all the data that was collected.
Due to errors in testing equipment, the data cannot be used to say exactly what can be seen. However, it can be used to show general trends. Steps to be taken in the future to make the testing better.

9 PDMS Stiffening Investigation
Humidity Hexenes Chamber Testing Assistance from Dr. Thomas Smith ~ Polymer Science Expert

10 Test Plan 10: Heat Cure Testing
Possible Heat Curing Conditions: Room temperature for 48 hours 75 degrees Celsius for 2 hours 100 degrees Celsius for 35 minutes Samples will be tested before and after incubation in humidity.

11 Cell Culture Testing - Recap
Decided to use 3T3 cells Testing shows that 3T3 cells adhere to collagen ECM on PDMS and have viable growth No real need for SHOX2 cell line for the purposes of our bioreactor SHOX2 cells would have wasted time and materials due to need for testing its properties 1:1 Collagen to PBS ratio for ECM Cells in this dish adhered best Cells were easily able to be viewed under microscope

12 Cell Culture Pugh

13 Test Plan 11: Cellular Response to Strain
Varied strain percentage and strain frequency conditions once whole system is functional. Tested ranges will depend on motor/actuator abilities. Expected strain percentage up to 20%. 1 Hz is max expected frequency range

14 Mechanical Strain Detailed Design
Decided to take a step back a look at other design alternatives that could be operated by a motor Came Up with 3 new motor driven designs Conducted a Pughs Analysis

15

16 Mechanical Strain Pugh

17 Actuator System Model

18 Rack and Pinion System Model

19 Rack and Pinion . Actuator
Pros: Dual chamber design with one motor Cons: More complex design More time consuming development Pros: Simple design and construction Time saver Cons: Risk in actuator overheating More expensive Need a second actuator in order to have dual chamber

20 Actuator - Top Straining Mechanism
Desired Specification: Min 1 cm stroke Have a max speed of >1 cm/sec Max 5 lb Load 100% Duty Cycle

21 Risk Assessment Update
Rack and Pinion - Motor more robust Actuator- More restrictions Straining Mech. stops working d

22 Budget

23

24 This will allow us to spend more time on the user testing activities!
If an actuator is purchased, we can bypass mechanical strain design activities. This will allow us to spend more time on the user testing activities!

25


Download ppt "Mechanical Bioreactor Detailed Design Review"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google