1. Region I IPP Data Update Region I IPP Advisory Board Meeting
November 9, 2011
Region I IPP Advisory Board Meeting 1

2. Data Overview Positivity
Progress towards Regional Goals and Objectives 2

3. Projected 2011= 42K 3

4. Chlamydia Positivity in Region I Family Planning Females by Year
% Positive
Trend overall is slightly increasing. Last two years it was around 5 % 4

5. Chlamydia Positivity in Region I Family Planning Females by Year
% Positive
Positivity ranges from around 3.4-7% in our region. No state has ever had positivity greater than 8% in family planning clinics.
This year:
VT-2.8%
RI-7%
NH-4.3%
MA-5.6%
ME -5.2%
CT-3.4%
Region 5.1% 5

6. Regional Goals and Objectives
By 2012, maintain 2010 CT screening numbers of sexually active year old women and men.
Changed objective at June 2011 meeting to maintain rather than increase numbers. Meeting new objective. 6

7. Objective 1.1
Questions – did testing decrease in different age groups or those not with risk factors – cause that’d be good 7

8. Regional Goals and Objectives
By 2012, no more than 5% of women more than 25 years of age with no risk factors will be screened in IPP-funded clinics (i.e., 95% will be screened according to regional screening criteria).

9. Objective 2.2
16% of all tests (9% and 7.3%) are in women 25+. Have been decreasing testing of women with Risk factors, but not women without risk factors. 9 9

10. Connecticut Risk Factors Family Planning Clinics, Women, 25+ (Objective 2.2: ≥95% screened)
95% goal
It's the Number women 25+ with risk factors/women 25+.
Note: CT does not screen women 25+
Note: CT does not screen women 25+ as of July 1, 2010. 10

11. Maine Risk Factors Family Planning Clinics, Women, 25+ (Objective 2
Maine Risk Factors Family Planning Clinics, Women, 25+ (Objective 2.2: ≥95% screened)
95% goal 11

12. Massachusetts Risk Factors Family Planning Clinics, Women, 25+ (Objective 2.2: ≥95% screened)
95% goal 12

13. New Hampshire Risk Factors Family Planning Clinics, Women, 25+ (Objective 2.2: ≥95% screened)
95% goal 13

14. Rhode Island Risk Factors Family Planning Clinics, Women, 25+ (Objective 2.2: ≥95% screened)
95% goal 14

15. Vermont Risk Factors Family Planning Clinics, Women, 25+ (Objective 2
Vermont Risk Factors Family Planning Clinics, Women, 25+ (Objective 2.2: ≥95% screened)
95% goal 15

16. Risk Factors Family Planning Clinics, Women, 25+ (Objective 2
Risk Factors Family Planning Clinics, Women, 25+ (Objective 2.2: ≥95% screened)
95% goal 16

17. % Rescreen Visits Among Family Planning Clinics
Q1/Q2 2011
Note: Connecticut does not have rescreen variable. They calculate rescreening rates at the state level.

18. Percent Positive Among Rescreen Visits
Q1/Q2 2011
Women < 25/26
Note: CT did not screen women 25+ staring from July 2010.
Note: Connecticut does not have rescreen variable. They calculate rescreening rates at the state level.

19. % PTO Visits, Family Planning Clinics
Q1/Q2 2011
This is % of all visits that have PTO variable checked. Note that this is Family Planning only – MA actually has higher numbers because greater variability of site type.

20. Percent Positive Among PTO/Non-PTO Visits in FP Clinics, Q1/Q2 2011
Women < 25/26
MA positivity is actually higher than 2.9 when using all site types. All states have under 100 PTO visits (except NH with 277) read positivity with caution as numbers are small.
They have 7.1% positivity in all sites (126 tests)
Non-PTO positivity in FP sites:
CT-3.48
MA-5.81
ME-5.35
NH-4.34
RI-9.51
VT-3.41
Table 1: Family Planning Clinic Data by Total Number of Clients Tested and Percent Positive
Region 1, Year End, 2010
Family Planning Clinics Total Tested Positive
N N %
dimension0 CT (n=14) %
MA (n=26) %
ME (n=19) %
NH (n=16) %
RI (n=9) %
VT (n=13) %
TOTAL (n=97) %
1 Total Tested includes valid chlamydia test results (indeterminate and missing CT test results are excluded).

21. Questions?
Need to come up with talking points 21