1. Does the in situ technique improve flow characteristics in femoropopliteal bypass? 
Mark Xavier Gannon, F.R.C.S., Malcolm Harold Simms, F.R.C.S., Mark Goldman, M.D., F.R.C.S. 
Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (December 1986)
DOI: / (86)
Copyright © 1986 Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
As judged by common femoral artery pulsatility index, inflow was similar in each group and, largely above 5, the lower limit of normal.
Journal of Vascular Surgery 1986 4, DOI: ( / (86) )
Copyright © 1986 Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Although turbulence increased significantly at the anastomosis, it did so to a similar extent in both reversed and in situ vein groups.
Journal of Vascular Surgery 1986 4, DOI: ( / (86) )
Copyright © 1986 Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Turbulence at the anastomosis was considerable whether reversed or in situ vein technique was used.
Journal of Vascular Surgery 1986 4, DOI: ( / (86) )
Copyright © 1986 Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 4
In mid thigh more laminar flow was established in both groups and FDI max fell.
Journal of Vascular Surgery 1986 4, DOI: ( / (86) )
Copyright © 1986 Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions