Download presentation
1
Automated systems: an overview
Robin A Howe Cardiff Insert name of presentation on Master Slide
2
AST standards MIC taken as standard measure of susceptibility
Agar dilution Broth dilution Microbroth dilution
3
ISO standard Broth microdiluion Mueller-Hinton Broth
Inoculum 5x105 cfu/mL
4
AST standards MIC taken as standard measure of susceptibility
Agar dilution Broth dilution Microbroth dilution S/I/R Breakpoints defined by BSAC/EUCAST/CLSI
6
AST standards MIC taken as standard measure of susceptibility
Agar dilution Broth dilution Microbroth dilution S/I/R Breakpoints defined by BSAC/EUCAST/CLSI MIC/BP supplemented by “expert rules” for clinical use
7
The rationale for automated systems
More reliable AST results ?closer to “standard” Reduced scope for “user” error Reproducible Improved ID linked to AST Embedded expert rules Automated systems: an overview
8
Identification required for interpretation of BP & expert rules
9
Welsh variability in ID of Enterobacter/Klebsiella/Serratia
10
The rationale for automated systems
More reliable AST results Improved ID linked to AST Embedded expert rules Improved speed of results Increased number of agents tested Automated systems: an overview
11
Welsh Gram negative panel Welsh Gram positive panel
12
The rationale for automated systems
More reliable AST results Improved ID linked to AST Embedded expert rules Improved speed of results Increased number of agents tested Laboratory workflow Staff skill mix Epidemiological software Automated systems: an overview
13
Available systems MicroScan WalkAway Biomerieux Vitek 2 BD Phoenix
14
MicroScan 96 well plates AST based on conventional microbroth dilution MIC ID currently biochemical
15
Microscan Conventional panels Rapid panels Synergies plus panels
Enterobacteriaceae, gram-negative non-fermenters, staphylococci, enterococci Combo, MIC-only, ID-only Rapid panels hour ID (pre-formed enzymes) AST for Gram negative organisms (MIC > 4 hrs) Synergies plus panels Broth microdilution “Read-when-ready” MIC Resistance detection flagged in as few as 4.5 hours All results finalized in 16/18 hours Additional Yeast ID, Anaerobe ID, HNID MICroSTREP plus ® - dry format ESβL plus ® -ESβL Confirmatory Panel Panels read by WalkAway® systems autoSCAN-4 Manual
16
Microscan Expert rules within LabPro Alert system Pre-loaded
customisable
17
Microscan Expert rules within LabPro Alert system Pre-loaded
customisable
18
Vitek 2 AST based on broth susceptibility with specific cards
ID currently biochemical Growth/reactions “continuously” monitored
19
Vitek 2 ID Cards available for AST Cards available for
Gram positives Enterobacteriaceae Non-Enterobacteriaceae Neisseria/Haemophilus etc Anaerobes Yeasts AST Cards available for Gram positive cocci Gram negative bacilli Up to 22 antibiotics tested on each card
20
VITEK 2 – MIC Interpretation
Interpretation of Raw Data Growth Parameters MIC Area Raw Data Slope % Change SLPAR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 13 16 15 17 18 TIME (hours) 20
21
Vitek 2 Expert rules within the Advanced Expert System (AES)
Extensive Knowledge Base >20,000 MIC distributions >2,500 Phenotypes >200 Resistance Mechanisms
22
Vitek 2 CARD Type Time to Result GN ID 2 to 10 hours GP ID
NH ID 6 hours ANC ID YST ID 18 hours GN AST 2 to 18 Hours GP AST AST-YS01
23
Phoenix AST based on broth susceptibility with specific cards
ID currently biochemical Growth/reactions “continuously” monitored
24
Phoenix AST only or Combo panels available for
GN (Enterobacteriaceae/ Nonfermenters) GP (Staphylococci/ Enterococci/ Streptococci) Streptococci ID/AST
25
Phoenix Readings for each well taken and calculated every 20 minutes
ID uses red, green, blue and UV light sources AST measures turbidity and color change Each well divided into pixels Readings taken for each pixel Entire process takes 7 minutes Pixel data analyzed for each well Readings for each well compared to previous reading and baseline Well is complete when specific amount of change is not seen Substrate/antimicrobic algorithm dependent Instrument will post results when enough data collected
26
Phoenix Expert rules within BDXpert based on CLSI/SFM/DIN/EUCAST rules bases
27
Comparison of systems
28
Performance ID AST Correct to genus >95% Correct to Species>90%
Difficulties with difficult organisms Non-fermenters Shigella etc AST Concordant with other methods >95% Specific issues with specific drug-bug combinations & certain instruments VISA/VRSA Beta-lactams & Pseudomonas
29
Performance ID/AST performance relies on correct ID, correct AST plus appropriate expert interpretation Incorrect ID can lead to incorrect AST Up to 5% errors mean that results should be examined critically
30
Conclusions Automated systems can provide
Reliable AST integrated with ID & expert rules Improved speed of results Caution about staff skill mix and interpretation of results Microscan/ Vitek 2 /Phoenix have similar performance overall Results should be examined critically
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.