1. by Jeffrey H. Schwartz, Ian Tattersall, and Zhang Chi
Comment on “A Complete Skull from Dmanisi, Georgia, and the Evolutionary Biology of Early Homo”
by Jeffrey H. Schwartz, Ian Tattersall, and Zhang Chi
Science
Volume 344(6182):
April 25, 2014
Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science

2. Fig. 1 Comparison of Dmanisi mandibles D211, D2735, and D4500
Fig. 1 Comparison of Dmanisi mandibles D211, D2735, and D4500.Note the obvious morphological differences in bone and tooth morphology (not to scale).
Comparison of Dmanisi mandibles D211, D2735, and D4500.Note the obvious morphological differences in bone and tooth morphology (not to scale).
Jeffrey H. Schwartz et al. Science 2014;344:360
Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science

3. Fig. 2 Array of specimens commonly deemed H. erectus
Fig. 2 Array of specimens commonly deemed H. erectus.The type specimen is Trinil 2 (Java), and the only specimens similar to it in derived features are from Sangiran (Java).
Array of specimens commonly deemed H. erectus.The type specimen is Trinil 2 (Java), and the only specimens similar to it in derived features are from Sangiran (Java). Otherwise, note the obvious morphological differences, not only between the Dmanisi specimens but also in the assemblage as a whole. ZKD, Zhoukoudian; ER, East Turkana; WT, West Turkana; r, reversed (not to scale).
Jeffrey H. Schwartz et al. Science 2014;344:360
Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science