1. Value Map for Sustainable Agricultural Practices
Assumptions:
The map must be termed as “Value Map for Sustainable Agricultural Practices”
Applicable for all sector of Agriculture (crop live stock and fisheries) and all types of farm and farmers
Threshold value of Agricultural Sustainability
Somebody may elaborate the horizon of sustainability if it is rational
Subjective and objective Measurement (Farm specific)
See my comments at end. Scale – may need different ones for a) all sectors of land use and b) individual farm

2. Assumptions (Contd.)
Data collecting Tools: From any arena of science (Physical, chemical, biological, natural, socio-psychological* etc.)
Final Value Map of Sustainable Agriculture must be presented in a pictorial form with Mean, SD, CV, Error Term etc.
…………………….

4. Farm health Ecosystem Farmers and residents health (physiological)
Soil health/land Use (points 2 and 3 together)
Seed/ Basic biodiversity
Agronutrients requirement (natural & artificial)
Intercultural Operations
Farm energy system (supply, end use, recycling)
Farm sustainable infrastructure, water, wastes
Climatic impact Stability/ GHG Emission (apparent/ precise)
Resource flows
Healthy (and efficient i.e. high production) products
Addressing farm ecosystem as inputs and outputs

5. Economic Ecosystem Cost of agri-inputs Credit (Availability)
Farm Affluence (Machineries, self sufficiency)
Poduction rescue (production and alternate cropping, Reuse of farm resources )
Storage & Marketing channel
Leftovers (NC, pests, storage, transport and distribution)
Overall Management (Man and Machine)
Utilization of end money
Resilience /adaptability over time

6. Social Ecosystem Information mobility
Control and Participation (gender, class, generation …)
Simplicity (user friendly)
Demonstrability educational value, transparency
Social Security (peace and equality)
Socio cultural compatibility / appropriate tech.
Social Utility (technology adoption and dissemination)
Aesthetics
Wellbeing

7. Methodologies Total map would be circular with three major arena
Each arena again divided into eight sub-regions (Active) horizontally with five vertical divisions
Each divisions have weighted as ‘1’ and its increase successively from centre to periphery (+1, +2,+3,+4,+5)* Likert Scale There is also 0

8. Coding So Range (Expected)= 1- 120 Scaling Title Scoring
= Least Sustainable (1-24)
= Very slightly Sustainable (25-48)
= Slightly Sustainable (49-72)
= Sensibly Sustainable (73-96)
= Sustainable (97-120)

9. Calculation
Colour should be on each cell on the basis of mathematical scaling (divided into 4 divisions and colour as per average value of sub sets)

11. ………………………………..Chris comments:
Great! For further development.
I would prefer a tougher definition in the scale, such as starting with 1. “very unsustainable” – meaning high negative impacts on soil, long term productivity, emissions, costly, gender discriminatory, controlled by the corporations not the farmers, etc.
Starting point is the farm, fine, but consider its context: all local residents and visitors as part of that farm ecosystem. Impact on neighbouring farms, local aquifer, the local economy, etc.
But: farm itself or whole food system??? The transport, refining, packaging stages of the cycle? Sustainable farm or sustainable food production and overall land use? Maybe very useful to develop a Value Map evaluation at both levels: farm only and whole food system. – asfor individual building or whole town.