Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJuliaan van der Linden Modified over 5 years ago
1
Janie K. Hoormann University of Queensland 23 April 2019
Black Hole Mass Measurements with the Australian Dark Energy Survey (OzDES) Janie K. Hoormann University of Queensland 23 April 2019
2
Active Galactic Nuclei
Compact central region of active galaxies AGN Structure Supermassive black hole ~ Msun Accretion Disk Light days Broad Line Region (BLR) clouds Light weeks/months Narrow Line Region clouds and Dusty Torus Light years Credit: Urry and Padovani 1995
3
Δt R ~ cΔt Time Disk Emission R Time Cloud Emission
4
Time Disk Emission Time Cloud Emission
5
Time Disk Emission Time Cloud Emission
6
Time Disk Emission Time Cloud Emission
7
Time Disk Emission Time Cloud Emission
8
Time Disk Emission Time Cloud Emission
9
Time Disk Emission Time Cloud Emission
10
Disk Emission Time Cloud Emission Time Δt R ~ cΔt R
Sample light curves from bitbucket.org/nye17/javelin
11
Reverberation Mapping
Calculate BLR radius using time delay between direct emission and ionized emission from BLR Use the width of the emission line to determine the velocity of the clouds Assuming black hole and clouds are in virial equilibrium 𝑀= 𝑓 𝑐 τ ∆ 𝑉 2 𝐺
12
The Big RM Questions Do the extrapolated Radius- Luminosity relationships really hold out to high redshifts? Secondary black hole mass measurements AGN as standard candles If we have black hole mass measurements out to high redshifts what can this tell us about black hole and galaxy evolution? Credit: Bentz et al ApJ 767:149 Figure 11
13
RM with OzDES Targeting 771 AGN in the 10 DES-SN fields
Weekly observations with DES Photometry taken with DECam on the 4m Blanco Telescope in Chile Model the continuum emission from the disk Monthly observations with OzDES Spectroscopy using 2dF AAOmega on the AAT at Siding Springs Model the response of the BLR Hβ , MgII, CIV emission lines
14
DES J z = 2.593 C Hoormann et al 2019, submitted to MNRAS, arXiv:
15
DES J M = (3.3 ± 1.2) x 109 Mʘ 343 days Observed Lag = 343 − days Rest Frame Lag = 95 − days z = 2.593 ~350 days C Hoormann et al 2019, submitted to MNRAS, arXiv:
16
DES J z = 1.905 Hoormann et al 2019, submitted to MNRAS, arXiv:
17
DES J M = (4.4 ± 2.0) x 109 Mʘ 358 days Rest Frame Lag = 123 − days Observed Lag = 358 − days z = 1.905 ~350 days Hoormann et al 2019, submitted to MNRAS, arXiv:
18
Hoormann et al 2019, submitted to MNRAS, arXiv:1902.04206
19
Future of OzDES
20
46 secure, 151 probable new lags measurements
with Year 5 data!!!!
21
Just look what one more year can do!
22
Summary OzDES is targeting 771 AGN out to z=4
Recovered first 2 lags using the CIV line Including one at z = 2.593! Preliminary look at year 5 data shows we should be able to recover almost 200 more! And there is still data from year 6 to analyse!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.