Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Re:180(JPN-012) of WG2N1452 Masao Okabe 2010/11/16 Masao Okabe.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Re:180(JPN-012) of WG2N1452 Masao Okabe 2010/11/16 Masao Okabe."— Presentation transcript:

1 Re:180(JPN-012) of WG2N1452 Masao Okabe 2010/11/16 Masao Okabe

2 Example1: Let us think about a simple sentence
carOwership(carOwer=Person:Tony, ownedCar=Car:Car#1234) MDR Part3 models this as an instance of Link as follows; Link:Link1( relation=Relation:carOwership, end=Concept:Tony, end=Concept:Car#1234) Relation:carOwereship (role=Relation_Role:carOwer, role=Relation_Role:ownedCar) Link_End:Link_End1 (end_role=Relation_Role:carOwer, end_role=Relation_Role:ownedCar) Note: Another issue: Do we need some more? Something like; Relation_Role:carOwer(range=Concept:Person) Relation_Role:ownedCar(range=Concept:Car) 2010/11/16 Masao Okabe

3 Example1: Since Link is a subclass of Assertion, this Link1 can be viewed as a instance of Assertion. Then, very naturally, Link1 as an instance of Assertion looks like;   Assetion:Link1( term=Concept:carOwership, term=Concept:Tony, term=Concept:Car#1234) We should not neglect “term=Concept:carOwership” , whereas Link1 as a instance of Link looks;     Link:Link1( relation=Relation:carOwership, end=Concept:Tony, end=Concept:Car#1234) 2010/11/16 Masao Okabe

4 Example2 : First one at Table E-28
Similarly, it can be written as an instance of Link as; Link:Link2( relation=Relation:instance-type, end=Concept::Car, end=Concept:owl:Class) Relation:instance-type (role=Relation_Role:instance, role=Relation_Role:rdf:type) Link_End:Link_End2 (end_role=Relation_Role:instance, end_role=Relation_Role:rdf:type) Note: Another issue: Do we need some more? Something like; Relation_Role:instance(range=Concept:Instance) Relation_Role:rdf:type(range=Concept:Concept) 2010/11/16 Masao Okabe

5 Example2 : First one at Table E-28
Since Link is a subclass of Assertion, this Link1 can be viewed as a instance of Assertion. Then, very naturally, Link1 as an instance of Assertion should be written as;   Assetion:Link2( term=Relation:instance-type, term=Concept::Car, term=end=Concept:owl:Class) We should not neglect “term=Relation:instance-type” , whereas Link2 as a instance of Link is written as; Link:Link2( relation=Relation:instance-type, end=Concept::Car, end=Concept:owl:Class) 2010/11/16 Masao Okabe

6 MDR Part3 should be consistent on the treatment of Example 1 and 2.
Then, relation-link should be a subclass (sub-association) of assertion_term. 2010/11/16 Masao Okabe


Download ppt "Re:180(JPN-012) of WG2N1452 Masao Okabe 2010/11/16 Masao Okabe."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google