Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byΆλκηστις Αλεβίζος Modified over 5 years ago
1
Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery†‡
H. Solus-Biguenet, M. Fleyfel, B. Tavernier, E. Kipnis, J. Onimus, E. Robin, G. Lebuffe, C. Decoene, F.R. Pruvot, B. Vallet British Journal of Anaesthesia Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006) DOI: /bja/ael250 Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions
2
Fig 1 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for PPVart, PPVfina and PAOP. British Journal of Anaesthesia , DOI: ( /bja/ael250) Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions
3
Fig 2 The relation between PPVfina (A) or PPVart (B) measured before volume loading steps (baseline values) and the changes in stroke volume index (SVI) induced by volume infusion. Horizontal dotted lines=10% increase in SVI (separating responder from non-responder volume loading steps). Vertical dotted lines=optimal threshold value. British Journal of Anaesthesia , DOI: ( /bja/ael250) Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions
4
Fig 3 Representation of Bland–Altman analysis of the relation between PPVfina (upper panel) or PPVsat (lower panel) and PPVart. Horizontal lines represent the mean (2 sd) range of the differences between PPVfina or PPVsat and PPVart, defining the 95% limits of agreement between the two methods tested. British Journal of Anaesthesia , DOI: ( /bja/ael250) Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.