Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byἩρωδίωνν Γούναρης Modified over 5 years ago
1
Pacific Northwest Fish Screening and Passage Workshop 2013
Thompson Falls Fish Ladder, a solution for Moving Bull Trout over a Montana Dam Regulatory and Consultation Process Pre Ladder Studies and Design Ladder Operation and Ongoing Research
2
PPL Montana, independent power producer, and merchant generator
Wild & Scenic Missouri Hebgen storage reservoir Hydro (595 MW) and Steam Electric (529 MW) Generation
3
Thompson Falls Hydroelectric Project
Constructed 1917, presently 93 MW 2 powerhouses with 2 dam segments spanning the Clark Fork River
4
Thompson Falls Hydroelectric Project
FERC license 1979, Amended 1990, Expires 2025 (relicensing begins 2020) Upstream Milltown removed, downstream Noxon/Cabinet pursuing passage TFalls passage opens 274 miles of upstream Clark Fork River to fish
5
Pre-Dam Thompson Falls (1915)
TFalls Main Channel Dam
6
ESA/FERC Regulatory Uncertainty at Thompson Falls Project (1999 to 2003)
Commission and PPLM conclude definitive federal action is required to trigger ESA consultation with USFWS and no federal regulatory nexus exists at TFalls USFWS affirms TFalls Project “taking” bull trout and can pursue enforcement action Commission proposes to investigate TFalls effects on bull trout and consider measures to avoid or mitigate impacts to this species Commission proposes if mitigative measures are necessary, they can pursue a license reopener to require measures or accept voluntary license amendment from PPLM for same PPLM proposes, in spirit of cooperation and per guidelines of Interagency Task Force Report, to be FERC’s non-federal representative to consult with USFWS on TFalls effects on bull trout Commission designates PPLM as its non-federal representative to consult with the USFWS and the ESA formal public study and report process begin
7
Formal TFalls Stakeholder MOU
Interagency Technical Advisory Committee (TAC): PPL Montana U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Montana Fish, Wildlife, & Parks Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes Avista Montana Dept. Environmental Quality
8
Tour of existing Columbia River hydro passage facilities with agency fisheries biologists, ladder design engineers, and regulatory specialists working on TFalls Project passage
9
Formal Process to Final Commission Order
Based on PPLM Draft BE to Commission in 2003, all agencies agree to detailed fish passage studies at TFalls from 2003 to 2008: These studies conclude that TFalls Project is “Likely to Adversely Effect Bull Trout” Blocked upstream Fish Passage Downstream Fish Passage marginally affected Bull predation in TFalls Reservoir Total Dissolved Gas (gas bubble trauma)
10
Formal Process to Final Commission Order
Completion of formal process then moved very fast: PPLM Final BE to Commission April 2008 Commission BA to USFWS May 2008 USFWS BO to Commission Nov 2008 Commission Order Approving Passage Plan Feb 2009
11
Feb 2009 Commission Order TFalls Passage Plan Conditions (to exempt PPLM and Commission from bull trout “take” provisions of ESA Section 9) Avoid and/or minimize TFalls Project effects to bull trout by: Facilitating interagency consultation per the MOU Providing effective upstream passage Providing effective downstream passage Reducing Total Dissolved Gas (TDG) Reducing predation effects in TFalls Reservoir Monitoring bull trout recovery Providing timely science & compliance reporting
12
Fish Passage Planning Studies
Passage Desirable? Disease concerns Fish Genetics & Native Species Concerns Where and How to Implement Passage Fish Behavior Engineering Feasibility Design Alternatives Evaluation
13
Radio Telemetry Study Stationary Receivers
14
Radio Telemetry Study Fish moved to Main Dam Spillway
Difficult site conditions at Main Dam Right abutment least problematic Modify spill schedule to attract fish to right bank
15
Main Dam Spillway
16
Right Bank Location
17
Right Bank Location
18
Right Bank
19
Left Bank Location
20
Fishway Feasibility Study
Three Alternatives: Right Bank Fish Lock Left Bank Full-Height Ladder (Revised) Right Bank Full-Height Ladder Preferred Alternative: Right Bank Full-Height Ladder, with Sample Facilities
21
Main Dam Spillway Spill Schedule
Good right side attraction and holding conditions at all spill levels Greater turbulence at left side
22
Operates around March 1 to November 1
Hydraulic lift (sort & sample) or volitional passage 48 pools each 6’ long x 5’ wide x 4’ deep Notches and/or orifice ladder weir configurations 6 cfs ladder flow w/ 60 cfs attractant flow and 20 cfs attraction jet
23
2,500 tons of rock removed July 2009
24
800-foot work bridge Up to 28 feet high September 2009
25
September 2009
26
June 2010
27
June 2010
30
PIT tag Control Center PIT tag antennas October 2010
31
Lock lifts fish 17’ 8” Crowder November 2010
32
Control Panel Lift Anesthetizing Tank Working Tables Recovery Tank February 2010
33
20 CFS ATTRACTANT FLOW November 2010
39
A few days open in June (21-24) and July (11-13).
40
Not in Operation Between April 28-May6, 2012 and June 19-July 2, 2012
47
Total Fish Count 2011 2012 2013 Dates Mar 17 - Oct 17 Mar 13 - Oct 15
Mar 13 - Aug 27 Total Fish 1,805 2,668 3,739
49
Evaluating Weir Modes Weir Mode 2011 # of Fish 2011 % of Fish
V-notch 114 6.3% 351 13.6% Orifice 1,691 93.7% 2,237 86.4% Total 1,805 2,588
50
Percentage by Species, V-notch vs. Orifice Modes
54
Salmonids Ascending Ladder
Year 2011 2012 2103 Mar 17 - Oct 17 Mar 13 - Oct 15 Mar 13 - Aug 27 Bull Trout 2 5 Rainbow Trout 164 208 166 Hybrid (RBxWCT) 9 7 12 W. Cutthroat 21 41 Brown Trout 28 42 90 Mountain Whitefish 17 24 1 Total 241 304 315
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.