1. MIMIC
ACCOUNTABILITY
USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?

2. D3 D1 2019 D2B D2A Domain 3 Domain 2B Domain 2A Final Score Domain 1
The accountability system will be the same as 2018
2019
How did each student group do in four components?
Academic Achievement - Meets performance in reading and math
Academic Growth - reading and math
English Language Proficiency – TELPAS
Student Success - Average of Approaches, Meets, and Masters (All subjects)
Domain 3 D3
Comparing your Domain 1 score with other campuses with the same percentage of Economic Disadvantage.
Domain 2B
D2B
Percent of students scoring at least as high as they did last year in Reading and Math (All Grades)
Domain 2A
D2A
70% Best of Domain 1, Domain 2A, and Domain 2B
30% The 4 components of Domain 3
Final Score
Review the accountability system for elementary principals D1
The average of Approaches, Meets, and Masters (All Subjects and Grades)
Domain 1

3. Year 2 Special Ed. & Former Special Ed. Economically Disadvantaged
Continuous
Enrolled
& Non-Cont Enrolled
Up to 14 student groups count for Domain 3
Must have 25 tests
Domain 3
Special Ed. & Former Special Ed.
Economically
Disadvantaged
African American, Hispanic, White, American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander, Two or More
Ethnicity/Race
Current and Monitor through year 4
English
Learners
STAAR and STAAR Alt 2
English and Spanish Testers
All Students
Year 2

4. 30% 33.3% 10% 55.6% 50% 10% 11.1% Academic Achievement EL Proficiency
Status of Four Components
Up to 14 student groups
Must have at least 25 tests
Domain 3
Meets grade level for reading and math.
Academic
Achievement
10%
Based on TELPAS performance scoring at Advanced High or higher than last time.
EL Proficiency
55.6%
50%
Academic
Growth
Reading and Math .
10%
11.1%
Average of Approaches Meets and Masters (All subjects)
Student
Success
TELPAS data is not available – so we will need to adjust the percents of each remaining component.

5. You will be provided with your 2018 Spring benchmark with 2018 STAAR accountability results and 2019 Spring benchmark

6. Lets drill into the provided data.

7. Explain how to read the provided data

8. Compare the 2018 benchmark data to the 2019 benchmark data

9. Details of the number of eligible groups and the number of those groups that met the target (for 2018 benchmark, STAAR, and 2019 benchmark)

10. 2019 RAW SCORE TARGETS ARE PROVIDED PROGRESS/GROWTH MEETS AVERAGE
TEA says we will use the same targets for four more years
2019
RAW SCORE TARGETS ARE PROVIDED F D C B A
HIGH
LOW
Think about how many more students would it take to get to the next Threshold
GREEN RANGE
PROGRESS/GROWTH
MEETS
AVERAGE

11. Additional pages also provided that drills into each domain and each student group.
REMEMBER the Spring 2019 data is missing the Science and Social Studies benchmark data from this week!

12. In those additional pages you will see not only the score of each student group – but also the targets for each group for each component of domain 3 and the number of students/points.

13. We will resend the Current Spring 2019 data along with this historical chart next week.
Along with these lists you will also receive your teacher data with accountability summary on the back and the STAAR & BENCHMARK Historical Comparison with the difference from the mean

14. Come to our Break-Out Session today!!
???
Questions
Come to our Break-Out Session today!!