1. STATEMENT OF TECHNICAL RATIONALE AND JUSTIFICATION
Proposal of content

2. Procedural background
Content:
Introduction
Procedural background
Existing regulations, directives and international voluntary standards
3.1 Technical references in the original development of this GTR No 2
UN Regulation No. 40, 01 series of amendments
EU Regulations:
Regulation (EU) No 168/2013
Regulation (EU) No 134/2014
Indian Regulation
MoSRT&H/ CMVR/ TAP-115/116 and Central Motor Vehicle Rule No. 115
Japanese Regulation
Road vehicle Act, Article 41 "Systems and Devices of Motor Vehicles"
Safety Regulations for Road Vehicles, Article 31 "Emission Control Devices“
USA Regulations:
US-FTP Subpart F, Emission Regulations for 1978 and Later New Motorcycles
ISO standards:
ISO (Motorcycles - Chassis dynamometer setting method);
ISO 6460 (gas sampling and fuel consumption);
ISO 4106 (Motorcycles -- Engine test code -- Net power);

3. Content:
3.2 Technical references in developing this revision of the GTR
Test type I:
UN GTR 15 (WLTP);
UN Regulation 40, UN Regulation 47 and UN R.E.3;
UN Regulation 83;
Regulation (EU) No 168/2013;
Test type II:
UN Regulation 40, UN Regulation 47; UN Regulation 83
Regulation (EU) No 168/2013
CITA
Test type VII:
UN Regulation 101, UN Regulation 83;
3.3 Methodology for deriving harmonised test procedures for this revision of the GTR
Make reference to the different points that the CP and stakeholders considered to introduce in this technical report. Further developed in EPPR (EPPR Sec.)

4. Content: 3.3 Regulatory impact and economic effectiveness
Anticipated benefits:
It would be more economically efficient to have manufacturers using a similar test procedure worldwide wherever possible to prove satisfactory environmental performance before placing a product on the market.
Potential cost effectiveness:
No full impact assessment
Advantage to citizens (improvement of environment