Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

Published byIrwan Susman Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID."— Presentation transcript:

1

2

3

4

5

6 If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15 T T T T F T F T T F T T T T F T F F T T F T F F

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Download ppt "If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID."

Similar presentations

The Important Thing About By. The Important Thing About ******** The important thing about ***** is *****. It is true s/he can *****, *****, and *****.

The Important Thing About By. The Important Thing About ******** The important thing about ***** is *****. It is true s/he can *****, *****, and *****.
Truth Functional Logic

Truth Functional Logic
Valid arguments A valid argument has the following property:

Valid arguments A valid argument has the following property:
Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.

Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.
Rules of Inferences Section 1.5. Definitions Argument: is a sequence of propositions (premises) that end with a proposition called conclusion. Valid Argument:

Rules of Inferences Section 1.5. Definitions Argument: is a sequence of propositions (premises) that end with a proposition called conclusion. Valid Argument:
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.

1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5. ” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage.

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5. ” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage.
7 The ENTHYMEME Arguments from SiGNS, PROBABiLiTiES, & CiRCUMSTANCE.

7 The ENTHYMEME Arguments from SiGNS, PROBABiLiTiES, & CiRCUMSTANCE.
Use a truth table to determine the validity or invalidity of this argument. First, translate into standard form “Martin is not buying a new car, since.

Use a truth table to determine the validity or invalidity of this argument. First, translate into standard form “Martin is not buying a new car, since.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.

Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
For Monday, read Chapter 4, Sections 1 and 2. Nongraded homework: Problems on pages 98-99. Graded HW #4 is due on Friday, Feb. 11, at the beginning of.

For Monday, read Chapter 4, Sections 1 and 2. Nongraded homework: Problems on pages Graded HW #4 is due on Friday, Feb. 11, at the beginning of.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.

Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
For Friday, read Chapter 3, section 4. Nongraded Homework: Problems at the end of section 4, set I only; Power of Logic web tutor, 7.4, A, B, and C. Graded.

For Friday, read Chapter 3, section 4. Nongraded Homework: Problems at the end of section 4, set I only; Power of Logic web tutor, 7.4, A, B, and C. Graded.
valid No patrons of fast-food restaurants are health

valid No patrons of fast-food restaurants are health
1.5 Rules of Inference.

1.5 Rules of Inference.
2.5 Verifying Arguments Write arguments symbolically. Determine when arguments are valid or invalid. Recognize form of standard arguments. Recognize common.

2.5 Verifying Arguments Write arguments symbolically. Determine when arguments are valid or invalid. Recognize form of standard arguments. Recognize common.
MATERI II PROPOSISI. 2 Tautology and Contradiction Definition A tautology is a statement form that is always true. A statement whose form is a tautology.

MATERI II PROPOSISI. 2 Tautology and Contradiction Definition A tautology is a statement form that is always true. A statement whose form is a tautology.
Validity All UH students are communists. All communists like broccoli. All UH students like broccoli.

Validity All UH students are communists. All communists like broccoli. All UH students like broccoli.
GLE 0701.5.5 Explore the concept of premises, including false premises. Intro to Logic.

GLE Explore the concept of premises, including false premises. Intro to Logic.
Truth-Table Definition of Validity An argument is truth-table valid if it is impossible for the premises to all be True and the conclusion False. I.e.,

Truth-Table Definition of Validity An argument is truth-table valid if it is impossible for the premises to all be True and the conclusion False. I.e.,

Similar presentations

Ads by Google