Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRose Matthews Modified over 5 years ago
1
Coronary bypass and carotid endarterectomy: does a combined approach increase risk? A metaanalysis
Michael A Borger, MD, Stephen E Fremes, MD, Richard D Weisel, MD, Gideon Cohen, MD, Vivek Rao, MD, PhD, Thomas F Lindsay, MD, C.David Naylor, MD, DPhil The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999) DOI: /S (99)
2
Fig 1 Relative risks (vertical lines) ± 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) for stroke in combined versus staged coronary artery bypass grafting/carotid endarterectomy. Values greater than 1.0 indicate increased risk for combined procedures. Note that the x-axis is logarithmic. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , 14-20DOI: ( /S (99) )
3
Fig 2 Relative risks (vertical lines) ± 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) for death in combined versus staged coronary artery bypass grafting/carotid endarterectomy. Values greater than 1.0 indicate increased risk for combined procedures. Note that the x-axis is logarithmic. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , 14-20DOI: ( /S (99) )
4
Fig 3 Relative risks (vertical lines) ± 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) for stroke or death in combined versus staged coronary artery bypass grafting/carotid endarterectomy. Values greater than 1.0 indicate increased risk for combined procedures. Note that the x-axis is logarithmic. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , 14-20DOI: ( /S (99) )
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.