Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 3. Sensitivity and specificity of microarray analysis in relation to target number Sensitivity and specificity of microarray analysis in relation.

Published bySugiarto Pranata Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 3. Sensitivity and specificity of microarray analysis in relation to target number Sensitivity and specificity of microarray analysis in relation."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 3. Sensitivity and specificity of microarray analysis in relation to target number
Sensitivity and specificity of microarray analysis in relation to target number (A) Comparison of overall assay accuracy (both sensitivity and specificity) when screening against an increasing number of target antigens. Assay specificity declines as the numbers of target antigens increases. Improved assay performance is achieved when a small panel of 10 targets is selected. (B) Dot plot compares the maximum binding intensity signal for each patient or control when comparing single and heteromeric complexes. GBS patient median arbitrary binding intensity for single targets (747.3 FIU) is significantly less than for heteromeric complex targets ( FIU; p < ), indicating that heteromeric complexes return higher signals than single antigens. Susan K. Halstead et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2016;3:e284 © 2016 American Academy of Neurology

Download ppt "Figure 3. Sensitivity and specificity of microarray analysis in relation to target number Sensitivity and specificity of microarray analysis in relation."

Similar presentations

Figure 2 ALSFRS-R changes (A) Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) slope after 6 months of treatment without (left)

Figure 2 ALSFRS-R changes (A) Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) slope after 6 months of treatment without (left)
Figure 1 Box plot of the venous diameter in lesions

Figure 1 Box plot of the venous diameter in lesions
Figure 3 Antibodies to MOG using different secondary antibodies: Anti-human IgG (H + L), IgG1, or IgM(A) Comparison of binding to full-length myelin oligodendrocyte.

Figure 3 Antibodies to MOG using different secondary antibodies: Anti-human IgG (H + L), IgG1, or IgM(A) Comparison of binding to full-length myelin oligodendrocyte.
Figure 2. Change in total PSPRS score from baseline to each study visit for all participants Change in total PSPRS score from baseline to each study visit.

Figure 2. Change in total PSPRS score from baseline to each study visit for all participants Change in total PSPRS score from baseline to each study visit.
Figure 3 Classical complement pathway activity and disease severity (A) Association between high innate classical pathway (CP) activity and degree of muscle.

Figure 3 Classical complement pathway activity and disease severity (A) Association between high innate classical pathway (CP) activity and degree of muscle.
Figure 1 Treg percentage and suppressive function increased during each round of Treg infusions Treg percentage and suppressive function increased during.

Figure 1 Treg percentage and suppressive function increased during each round of Treg infusions Treg percentage and suppressive function increased during.
Figure 3 Immune response to neoantigen: Geometric mean titers of antirabies antibody levels over timeAt days 31 and 38, all subjects achieved antibody.

Figure 3 Immune response to neoantigen: Geometric mean titers of antirabies antibody levels over timeAt days 31 and 38, all subjects achieved antibody.
Figure 3 JCV index changes in JCV+ patients

Figure 3 JCV index changes in JCV+ patients
Figure DPPX antibodies as detected by fluorescence-based immunohistochemistry and a cell-based assayImmunohistochemistry displayed binding of the patient's.

Figure DPPX antibodies as detected by fluorescence-based immunohistochemistry and a cell-based assayImmunohistochemistry displayed binding of the patient's.
Figure 3 Age, pretreatment, sex, and leukopenia do not influence CD19+ cell repopulation Age, pretreatment, sex, and leukopenia do not influence CD19+

Figure 3 Age, pretreatment, sex, and leukopenia do not influence CD19+ cell repopulation Age, pretreatment, sex, and leukopenia do not influence CD19+
Figure 1 Flow diagram of the assays and the samples that were evaluatedA total of 1,109 samples were initially screened at a serum dilution of 1:20 for.

Figure 1 Flow diagram of the assays and the samples that were evaluatedA total of 1,109 samples were initially screened at a serum dilution of 1:20 for.
Figure 2 Elevated antibody reactivities against myelin and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) peptides in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and higher.

Figure 2 Elevated antibody reactivities against myelin and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) peptides in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and higher.
Figure 1 MOR103 sequential-dose trial flowchart of study population with multiple sclerosis aPatients received 2 doses of study drug before trial withdrawal.

Figure 1 MOR103 sequential-dose trial flowchart of study population with multiple sclerosis aPatients received 2 doses of study drug before trial withdrawal.
Figure 2 Correlation between total IgG levels and anti-AQP4 IgG titer

Figure 2 Correlation between total IgG levels and anti-AQP4 IgG titer
Figure 1 8-Iso-PGF2α levels in CSF of patients with MS and controlsCSF 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α) levels were estimated using an ELISA. (A)

Figure 1 8-Iso-PGF2α levels in CSF of patients with MS and controlsCSF 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α) levels were estimated using an ELISA. (A)
Figure 2 DTI values between the hepatitis C group and controls(A) DTI FA values, (B) DTI diffusion values. *Statistically significant at FDR-adjusted p.

Figure 2 DTI values between the hepatitis C group and controls(A) DTI FA values, (B) DTI diffusion values. *Statistically significant at FDR-adjusted p.
Figure 1 Time points of blood sampling

Figure 1 Time points of blood sampling
Figure 1 GABAB expression in the thymus(A–C) Staining of thymus tissue with anti-cytokeratin (A) and anti-GABAB antibody (B, C double immunofluorescence).

Figure 1 GABAB expression in the thymus(A–C) Staining of thymus tissue with anti-cytokeratin (A) and anti-GABAB antibody (B, C double immunofluorescence).
Figure 3. Time curves for GFAP, S100B, and tTau release in CSF

Figure 3. Time curves for GFAP, S100B, and tTau release in CSF
Figure 2 CD4+ and CD8+ T cells accumulate in the CSF in GABAB receptor antibody–associated LE CD4+ and CD8+ T cells accumulate in the CSF in GABAB receptor.

Figure 2 CD4+ and CD8+ T cells accumulate in the CSF in GABAB receptor antibody–associated LE CD4+ and CD8+ T cells accumulate in the CSF in GABAB receptor.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google