Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK"— Presentation transcript:

1 Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK
The Predictability of the Earth’s Radiation Belts Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK Invited talk, VarsITI Closing Symposium, Sofia, Bulgaria, 10th June 2019

2 Outline Why do we need to predict the radiation belts ?
The proton belt – an example Variability of the electron belts Physical processes that control the electron radiation belts Example forecasting system - SaRIF

3 Earth’s Radiation Belts
Electrons and ions trapped inside the magnetic field Only one proton belt Two electron belts Energies > 1 MeV Peaks near 1.6 and 4.5 Re Outer electron belt highly variable Hazardous for spacecraft and humans

4 Solar Energetic Particle Events – Proton Belt
Maybe 1 – 3 per solar cycle Protons become trapped in the outer region of the proton belt Last for months – then released in a magnetic storm O’Hare et al., (2019): 10Be and 36Cl in ice cores in ~660 BC indicate an event 10 times bigger than we have ever recorded directly (1956 event)

5 Proton Radiation Belt Before March 1991 After March 1991 SEP event

6 Proton Belt - Degradation of Satellite Solar Arrays
Cover-glass thickness 150 um Launch before event – lose 3.5% of power before reaching orbit Launch after event – lose 8% of power before reaching orbit Electric propulsion used commercially since 2015 ~ 200 days to reach orbit Lozinski et al. SW (2019)

7 Variability of the Electron Belts - 1. Day to Day
Geostationary orbit How do you produce high energy ( >1 MeV) electrons? What causes the variations? No electrons greater than ~800 keV in the inner belt

8 Variability of the Electron Belts – 2. CME/Shock Compression
Horne and Pitchford, (2015) New Electron Belt Formed in 2 Minutes Slot region ‘filled-in’ Decay timescale ~ year Geostationary orbit 8,000 km Slot region orbit

9 Variability of the Electron Belts – 3. Major Geomagnetic Storms
Baker et al. Nature (2004) GEO orbit (approx.) Haloween storms of 23rd Oct to 6th Nov 2003 47 satellites reported malfunctions 1 total loss 10 satellites – loss of service for more than 1 day Electrons at much lower L Decay time ~ year

10 Variability of the Electron Belts - 4. Rapid Loss
Rapid loss – or drop out Baker et al. [2016]

11 Electron Radiation Belt Dynamics
b). Plasmaspheric hiss 13:49:24 13:49:29 13:49:34 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.5 1.5 Frequency (kHz) UT 10-15 10-14 10-13 10-12 SC1 Rumba V2m-2Hz-1 Magnetopause inward motion – causes loss rapid motion – acceleration Magnetic field fluctuations driven by ULF waves Hiss waves Loss 13:01:12 13:01:17 13:01:22 UT 0.0 0.5 2.0 1.0 1.5 10-13 10-12 10-11 10-10 10-8 10-9 V2m-2Hz-1 SC1 Rumba a). EMIC waves 13:00 14:00 15:00 UT 0.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.5 Frequency (Hz) 10-2 100 102 nT2Hz-1 CRRES - FMI Chorus waves Acceleration and loss EMIC waves Loss > 2 MeV Electron drift path Plus other waves and transport processes Activity, location and energy dependent Nonlinear, timescale –us to days

12 Time Dependent Model of the Electron Belts
Pitch angle diffusion Energy diffusion Solve the Fokker-Planck Equation Model includes: Wave-particle interactions Radial transport Loss to the atmosphere Loss to the magnetopause Radial diffusion Loss to atmosphere Loss to the magnetopause

13 Satellite Risk Prediction and Radiation Forecast (SaRIF)
Solar wind data from L1 Pressure and IMF Bz Forecast magnetopause Forecast Kp Plasma wave properties scaled by Kp Calculate pitch angle and energy diffusion coefficients ULF wave power scaled by Kp Calculate radial diffusion coefficients Electron flux and energy spectrum scaled by Kp Calculate spectrum at outer boundary Calculate flux at low energy boundary Solve Fokker-Planck Equation and forecast entire radiation belt flux

14 Example - 30 year Reconstruction of the Radiation Belts
Glauert et al., SW, (2018) Coronal holes - Fast solar wind GEO Slot Inner belt

15 Satellite Risk Prediction and Radiation Forecast (SaRIF) – Geostationary Orbit
Available as SaRIF via the ESA Space Weather Web portal

16 Satellite Risk Prediction and Radiation Forecast (SaRIF) – Geostationary Orbit
Available as SaRIF via the ESA Space Weather Web portal

17 Predictability - Timescales
Sun to L1 – usually 1-2 days, but the fastest is 14.5 hours L1 to magnetopause - ~ 30 minutes, but can be much faster Magnetopause to radiation belts – from tens of minutes to a few hours Inside the magnetosphere: Plasma waves can cause acceleration to MeV energies and loss – from milliseconds to days Transport across the magnetic field - from hours to days Magnetopause compression can cause rapid loss ~ tens of minutes – and or acceleration Substorm cycle – few hours – but can repeat for days - storms If the solar wind is ‘quiet’ we may be able to forecast up to 24 hours, maybe more – but rapid changes in the solar wind can reduce or remove our ability to predict Essential to know solar wind pressure and IMF Bz

18 Summary Electron radiation belts can vary on timescales from few minutes to days To predict – need forecast of solar wind at L1 – pressure, IMF Bz We must also develop more understanding of: Non-linear wave-particle interactions on timescales from milliseconds to days Diffusive and non-diffusive transport Shock driven compression of the magnetopause Magnetic field disruptions during storms Changes in the source electrons These are major challenges But they are needed to protect satellites from Space Weather


Download ppt "Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google