1. Lisa Celaya Coordinator Educational Services January 20, 2015
SEBT Meeting
Lisa Celaya
Coordinator Educational Services
January 20, 2015

2. District Goals
žAt least 50% of all lessons will be differentiated to meet the diverse learning needs of all students.
ž100% of all ELA & Math lessons will be aligned to the standards outlined in the CCSS Units of Study.
žAt least 75% of student tasks will be at a level 2 or higher on Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
žAt least 50% of each lesson will include students reading, writing, & speaking independently/ collaboratively.

3. WELCOME We will look over our SEBT data for the 2nd trimester.
We will read the Lara initiative and discuss the future implications.
We will revisit the Spanish/English percentages based on discussions from last meeting.
We will discuss ELL committee & future meetings
We will look at tool kit lessons in Spanish that will be available on Edmodo.

4. Data - Kindergarten

5. Data 1st Grade - Tri 1

6. Data - 1st Grade - Tri 2 School: Not Yet Meeting Approaching Meets
Nicoloff 90% to 38% 10% to 60% 0% to 2%
Oneonta 88% to 52% 2% to 39% 0% to 4%
Pence 75% to 70% 20% to 25% 5% to 5%
Sunnyslope 87% to 27% 13% to 55% 0% to 18%

7. Data - 2nd Grade Tri 1

8. Data - 2nd Grade Tri 2 School: Not Yet Meeting Approaching Meets
Central 93% to 85% 7% to 15% 0% to 0%
Nicoloff 87% to 67% 13% to 33% 0% to 0%
Oneonta 87% to 79% 13% to 21% 0% to 0%
Pence 63% to 50% 37% to 50% 0% to 0%
Sunnyslope 70% to 54% 28% to 40% 3% to 6%

9. Data - 3rd Grade Tri 1

10. Data - 3rd Grade Tri 2 School: Not Yet Meeting Approaching Meets
Central 89% to 48% 11% to 52% 0% to 0%
Nicoloff 93% to 57% 7% to 43% 0% to 0%
Oneonta 63% to 17% 37% to 83% 0% to 0%
Pence 100% to 50% 0% to 50% 0% to 0%
Sunnyslope 48% to 37% 34% to 55% 3% to 5%

11. Illuminate Illuminate Website: Performance Summary Student Overview
Student and Parent Letters
Student Responses

12. Lara Initiative History with Prop 227 - Lara Initiative
Jigsaw: A: pg. 1, B. pg. 2, C. pg. 3, D. pg.4 & E. pgs
Chart Comparisons
Implications
Prop 227: (Ron Unz)
The voters of California passed Proposition 227 in 1998 in a time of high levels of immigration and concerns about the economic, social, cultural and linguistic. The “English for the Children” campaign led voters to believe that restrictions on bilingual education would lead to more and faster learning of English among immigrant students in the public schools. This was based on the false belief that bilingual instruction delays or slows English language learning, a belief that is soundly discredited by credible and objective education research.
Jigsaw:
SB Lara Initiative: (on November 8, 2016 ballot)
The proposed measure, upon voter approval, would repeal most of the 1998 Proposition 227, the “English in Public Schools” initiative, thus effectively allowing non-English languages to be used in public educational instruction. The measure would repeal the sheltered English immersion requirement and waiver provisions required by Proposition 227, and instead require that school districts and county offices of education shall provide English learners with a structured English immersion program.
Passing this popular initiative will enable school districts to respond to the high demand for programs to enable California’s students to be prepared with the multilingual and multicultural skills they need to compete in the global marketplace. The California Legislature recognized the importance of biliteracy through the Seal of Biliteracy Program through passage of Assembly Bill 815 (Brownley) in January Rescinding Prop 227 will remove obstacles and barriers to full and effective implementation of dual language programs. Below are 5 reasons to support SB 1174:
Proposition 227 is obsolete.
Prop 227’s program requirements do not reflect the “state of the art” in effective programs for English Learners.
Prop 227’s “30 days in English” requirement is counter-productive and detrimental to effective educational program implementation.
Prop 227’s parental waiver requirements are discriminatory.
Prop 227’s teacher liability lawsuit provision discourages future bilingual teachers from entering the teaching profession.
Implications:
SB Lara Initiative has been approved by the Governor (Brown) and filed with the Secretary of State on September 28, In

13. English/Spanish Percentages
TK Guidelines: 70% Spanish & 30% English - Spanish 228 minutes, English 97 minutes
Kinder Guidelines: 70% Spanish & 30% English - Spanish 228 minutes, English 97 minutes
1st Grade Guidelines: 60% Spanish & 40% English - Spanish 195 minutes, English 130 minutes
2nd Grade Guidelines: 50% Spanish & 50% English - Spanish 162 minutes, English 163 minutes
3rd Grade Guidelines: 35% Spanish & 65% English - Spanish 113 minutes, English 211 minutes

14. ELL Committee EL Master Plan - changes (forms, language, etc.)
CELDT - ELPAC (stakeholders)
Lara Initiative
Next Steps
Day 1:
EL Master Plan, Forms - changes: RFEP, Programs, Annual/Initial Letters
Day 2:
CELDT - ELPAC; Lara Initiative (CELDT , Waiver like with SBAC - ELPAC , ? ELPAC (English Language Proficiency and Alternate Assessments for California/Long Term English Learners -- Ed Code
Day 3:
Title III Plan/LCAP/ELD Standards

15. Possible ELPAC Dates
SBUSD submitted A

16. Comprehension Tool Kit Lessons
Edmodo
Kinder
2nd
5th
3rd

17. Dates Trimester 3 Testing Window: SEBT Collaboration Meeting:
May , 2015
Scores due May 22 in Illuminate
SEBT Collaboration Meeting:
June 2, :30 - 5:30 Ed Center