1. A Comparison of Balance Performance: Computerized Dynamic Posturography and a Random Motion Platform 
Steven P. Broglio, PhD, ATC, Jacob J. Sosnoff, PhD, Karl S. Rosengren, PhD, Kate McShane 
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
DOI: /j.apmr
Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1 SOT–6 conditions, used courtesy NeuroCom, International.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
The PROPRIO 5000 device.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
Representative PROPRIO dynamic motion analysis score divided into 10-second intervals. Calculated dynamic motion analysis scores were only completed out to 80 seconds as a result of many subjects failing to complete the test beyond that point.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions