1. SAR MEBT Bilbao 27-28 March Mats Lindroos
Chair of the review committee
European Spallation Source ERIC
MEBT SAR in Bilbao – March’19

2. System Acceptance Review for the MEBT https://chess. esss. lu
The SAR is meant to be the final technical review of the system as tested before delivery to ESS, Lund. As such, it examines the final technical design and tests of the integrated system.
This SAR is for the MEBT. It covers in detail the system readiness of all MEBT beam line and rack components. The buncher RF distribution system and the RF rack components are handled separately.
The scope for the review includes:
System verification of all MEBT components (magnets, buncher, chopper, collimator and beam instrumentation including their rack components)
The IRR Committee conducts this review of design with the authority of ACCSYS Project Leader, Mats Lindroos, and ESS Chief Executive Officer, John Womersley.
The Committee serves in an advisory capacity to:
the ACCSYS WP3, WP7 Leaders and
the ACCSYS management team

3. Agenda

4. Charge Will the MEBT system meet its technical specifications?
Are the interfaces between the various components and subsystems that compose this system completed defined in terms of: a) physical connection – location and type of mating flanges, location and type of power and cable connections, support stands etc. and b) physical parameters (pressure, temperatures, current, voltage, etc.)
Have all interfaces between this system and other systems been completely defined and agreed. Are all requirements on the tunnel (like temperature stability, etc) been agreed?
Has an integrated control system (both hardware and software) been developed and tested that permits control of the system, collection of data and integration of this system into accelerator operations?
Is the planned document delivery in accordance to the In-Kind Agreement in terms of format and scope?
Are the alignment requirements agreed upon and can the system components be aligned within these requirements?
Have all recommendations from component design reviews been addressed?

5. Review committee Name Organisation Appointment for IRR Mats Lindroos
ESS, Head of Accelerator Division
Chairman of the Review Committee
Håkan Danared
ESS, Linac Group Leader
Review Committee member
Thomas Shea
ESS, Beam Instrumentation Section Leader
Mamad Eshraqi
ESS, Beam Physics
Mario Perez
ESS Bilbao, Executive Director
Fabien Rey
ESS, Survey, Alignment & Metrology Group Leader
Reviewer
Marcelo Juni Ferreira
ESS, Vacuum Systems Leader
Edgar Sargsyan
ESS, WP3 Deputy Leader
Ibon Bustinduy
ESS Bilbao, Project Leader
Bjorn Rundcrantz
ESS, mechn. quality
Stefan Arvidsson
ESS, electr. quality
Karl Vestin
ESS, ICS
Georg Hulla
WP3 installation leader
Observer
Laurence Page
Vacuum and procedure to connect to the LEBT and the MEBT
Pedro Gonzalez
ESS-BILBAO / Tech. Director
ESS-BILBAO / PM
Presenter
Giles Harper
ESS-BILBAO / LPS
Javier Martin
ESS-BILBAO / Mech. Assembly Alignment
Alexander Conde
Aitor Zugazaga
ESS-BILBAO / Vacuum
Juan Luis Muñoz
ESS-BILBAO / QUAD
David Fernandez
Nagore Garmendia
ESS-BILBAO / BUNCHER
Seadat Varnasseri
ESS-BILBAO / PBI
Angel R. Páramo
Idoia Mazkiaran
ESS-BILBAO / Control
Igor Rueda
ESS-BILBAO / Mech.
Roberto San Martin
ESS-BILBAO / COUPLER
Arturo Ortega
ESS-BILBAO / EBW
Janet Schmidt
MEBT machine section coordination ESS
Joao Paulo Martins
ESS, ICS, Control System Integrator
Clement Derrez
ESS, Beam Instrumentation (non-Bilbao contribuition)