1. Review of BWD reporting for 2009 season (Item 2)

2. General issues QA/QC phase (February-March 2010)
Main issues (ETCW asked countries):
for reasons of de-listing BWs (BE, FR, IT, LT)
for reasons of closing of BWs and the length of a ban/closure (CZ, IT, PL, PT; DE, ES)
for confirmation in regard to new, re-opened, de-listed BWs or BWs with replaced NumInd/BWID (BE, DE, DK, ES, FR, GR, HU, IT)
for confirmation in regard to closed, not sampled BWs (DE; AT, GR)
coordinates (DE, DK, FR, GR, HU, ES, IT, RO, UK)

3. The first draft assessment: 23./24.3.2010
Main issues:
updated data (some MS corrected errors during QA/QC, additional data received after the reporting deadline …)
updated general information by MS authorities
updated region and province names and division (check
of WISE data viewer)
sampling frequency criteria
issues raised by countries:
- transition period assessment rules (the Netherlands)
- several samples per day (Germany)
- not sampled bathing waters (the UK)
- BW groups (Hungary)
The final draft assessment:

4. Response by MS
Almost all MS sent complete data/information as requested during QA/QC phase.
Most MS (23) provided comments to the first draft assessment and some MS (8) provided comments to the final draft assessment as well.
Additional correspondence with some MS (DE, HU, NL, UK, LU, SE, ES, FI, SK, LT …) due to special issues raised or further clarifications needed during assessement period.

5. General findings (1)
There is significant improvement compared to the previous season (e.g. de-listed BWs, coordinates).
Communication with MS (two-way flow of information, clarifications and expertise between MS and ETC/W) has a key role in producing national assessments.
Communication with MS could be reduced if some specifications in DD would be more specific (not ambiguous, additional categories in some attributes).

6. General findings (2)
Checking of draft assessments by MS is also an opportunity to check the reported data. Sending corrections and additional data improves the quality, but the time to produce the assessments is shorter. This means time pressure for EEA-ETC/W to process the printed EU and electronic national reports.
National bathing water reports can be made for non-EU countries (e.g. CH, HR). Some modifications were needed (CH).

7. Go to item 3: QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION