Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Current Challenges of Fiduciary Administration in an Era of Multi- Jurisdiction Practice – Changing Trust Situs Thomas M Forrest U.S. Trust Company of.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Current Challenges of Fiduciary Administration in an Era of Multi- Jurisdiction Practice – Changing Trust Situs Thomas M Forrest U.S. Trust Company of."— Presentation transcript:

1 Current Challenges of Fiduciary Administration in an Era of Multi- Jurisdiction Practice – Changing Trust Situs Thomas M Forrest U.S. Trust Company of Delaware June 5, 2019 U.S. TRUST: CONFIDENTIAL

2 Disclosure This presentation is designed to introduce you to the products and services available through U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management, is provided for informational purposes only, and is not issued in connection with any proposed offering of securities. This presentation is not used with regard to any specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient and does not contain investment recommendations. Bank of America and its affiliates do not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential damages or losses arising from any use of this presentation or its contents. The information in this presentation was obtained from sources believed to be accurate, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. The opinions expressed herein are made as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee the views and opinions expressed in this presentation will come to pass. Other affiliates may have opinions that are different from and/or inconsistent with the opinions expressed herein. All charts are based on historical data for the time periods indicated and are intended for illustrative purposes only. IMPORTANT: The material presented is designed to provide general information about ideas and strategies. It is for discussion purposes since the availability and effectiveness of any strategy is dependent upon your individual facts and circumstances. Always consult with your independent attorney, tax advisor, investment manager, and insurance agent for final recommendations and before changing or implementing any financial, tax, or estate planning strategy. U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management operates through Bank of America, N.A. and other subsidiaries of Bank of America Corporation ("BofA Corp."). Bank of America, N.A., Member FDIC. U.S. Trust Company of Delaware is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BofA Corp. This presentation may not be reproduced or distributed without prior written consent. ©2017 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved. | ARBNSYRV | PPT | 11/2017 2

3 Changing trust situs Choice of law
When creating a new trust, a grantor can and should designate the state law that will govern the validity and construction of the terms of the trust and the state law that will govern the administration of the trust. What happens when the grantor is deceased and the beneficiaries learn that the state law governing administration of the trust is more favorable in a different state? The following presentation will provide the reasons for changing the situs of the trust, the benefits that may be achieved and the challenges and roadblocks that may occur during the process. (Presentation will focus on Delaware but many of the issues also apply to other states as well)

4 Reasons for moving trusts
Administration Administrative flexibility Avoidance or minimization of accounting requirements and other administrative costs Modify trust administrative provisions State income tax savings Favorable trust laws Dynasty trust provisions The availability of a total-return unitrust statute Privacy Privacy/confidentiality reasons Greater assurance that trust assets will be secure from creditor claims Investment/tax opportunities Ability to designate an independent investment advisor to manage the trust assets Allocation of fees and expenses between Income and Principal Better investment flexibility Reduce or eliminate state fiduciary income tax Investment Flexibility Concentrated positions in trust Special assets

5 Why do clients choose Delaware?
Flexible trust structures Directed Trusts Use of Investment Advisors Use of Distribution Advisors Use of Protectors Trust Decanting Equitable Adjustments Favorable trust laws Dynasty Trusts Total Return Trusts Asset Protection Trusts Silent Trusts Purpose Trusts Trust Modification and Decanting Administrative Flexibility Advantageous tax laws No Delaware state income tax on trusts* No intangibles or excise taxes Trust-friendly environment High regard for privacy and confidentiality Well-respected Court of Chancery Industry-leading and innovative body of trust law * Provided beneficiaries are not residents of Delaware

6 A progressive climate for trust assets
1986 DIRECtED trusts Delaware adopted a modern portfolio approach to investing, authorizing trustees to follow the investment directions of an “investment advisor” named by the trust, without liability for investment results. 1997 Domestic asset protection trusts The Qualified Dispositions in Trust Act authorizes self-settled asset protection trusts to protect assets from future creditors’ claims while allowing the grantor to retain certain interests in the trust, including receiving discretionary distributions. Trust decanting Delaware created a mechanism to modify the terms of an irrevocable trust by creating and transferring existing assets to an entirely new trust — a powerful administrative tool for dealing with legal, tax, investment or beneficiary changes over time Act permits decanting into the same trust, without the need to create a new separate trust. 1995 2000 2000 Total return unitrusts Delaware enacted the first total return unitrust statute allowing the establishment of or conversion to a unitrust, thus aligning the investment interests of both current beneficiaries and remaindermen. 1986 1995 Dynasty trusts Delaware repealed the “Rule Against Perpetuities,” enabling grantors to establish trusts that span generations and limit transfer tax exposure. 1997

7 A progressive climate for trust assets
2009 Power to adjust Delaware law permits a trustee to adjust between principal and income as necessary to administer a trust impartially among the beneficiaries — both current and remainder. 2016 Trust modification Delaware enhanced its trust modification legislation by expanding the scope of the Non-Judicial Settlement Agreement statute and by enacting a Modification statute allowing for more extensive modification of irrevocable trusts, with grantor participation, without Court involvement. 2017 EXCLUDED TRUSTEE Delaware law permits co-trustees to direct certain actions of another co-trustee and the excluded trustee is not liable for any loss resulting directly or indirectly from the action taken by the co-trustee. 2013 2013 Nonjudicial settlement agreement Delaware permits settlors, beneficiaries and fiduciaries an additional way to resolve matters with respect to trust administration without the time and expense of court involvement. 2009 2016 2017

8 2017/2019 Trust Act Highlights Decanting Statute enhanced to permit decanting into the same trust, without the need to create a new separate trust. Modification Statute amended to permit an agent for the Settlor under a power of attorney the power to participate in the modification of a trust.  New limitations period for actions against a trustee of 120 days following the issuance of an adequate report to the beneficiaries.  Introduction of the Excluded Co-Trustee Statute allowing the appointment of a co- trustee with designated authority to take specific actions on behalf of the trust.  2018 Act expanded the virtual representation statute with several new subsections added.    

9 MOVING TRUSTS TO DELAWARE

10 Situs Trust situs means different things in different contexts
State Income Tax Administration Validity Construction Conflicts of law

11 Trust Modifications Non-judicial Settlement Agreement & Modification by Consent while Trustor is Living Decanting Merger Court Order Administrative Power of Amendment

12 Non-Judicial Settlement Agreement (NJSA) §3338 – revised 7/29/16
Advantages: Relatively quick process Less cost – no court filing fees Unlike a merger and decanting, beneficiary action is required Disadvantages: Delaware trustee must accept its appointment prior to the NJSA NJSA now permitted for charitable trusts (2017 Act permits NJSA for charitable trusts) NJSA can not violate a material purpose of the trust (only applies in cases where trustor is not living)

13 Non-Judicial Settlement Agreement (NJSA) §3338 revised 7/29/16
Section 3338 of Title 12 of the Delaware Code provides a non-exclusive list of six matters that may be resolved by a NJSA: Interpreting/construing the terms of a trust Approving report/accounting of a trustee Directing a trustee to refrain from exercising a power or granting a power to a trustee Resignation, appointment, or determination of compensation of a trustee Transferring the principal place of administration of a trust; and Determining the liability of a trustee for an action relating to the trust. The revised NJSA statute removes the restriction that an NJSA may only include terms and conditions that could be properly approved by the Court of Chancery, and if the trustor is alive, the NJSA may violate a material purpose of the trust.

14 Modification of Trust by Consent While Trustor is Living (§3342 enacted 7/29/16)
New statute permits any trust to be modified upon written consent or written non- objection of the trustor, beneficiaries, and all living fiduciaries. Modifications could include: Converting a trust to a directed trust; Correcting drafting errors; Adding or changing beneficial interests; Granting powers of appointment; Changing grantor trust treatment; Including silent trust provisions; 2017 Trust Act permits modifications by an agent under the power of attorney or the terms of the trust’s governing instrument.

15 Decanting (§3528) Advantages: Relatively quick process
Less cost – no court filing fees Statute specifically permits the creation and decanting into a new trust Disadvantages: A decanting involves the Trustee’s exercise of its independent discretion Delaware trustee must accept its appointment prior to the decanting Jurisdiction – Any jurisdictional concerns may not be raised until a challenge is brought Unlike a merger, the decanting statute has numerous requirements (ability to invade principal for example) Unlike a merger, most states do not have decanting statutes and most trust instruments do not have a decanting clause 2017 Trust Act permits trustees to decant into the same trust, without the need to create a new separate trust

16 Merger §3325(29) Advantages: Relatively quick process
Less cost – no court filing fees Most states have merger statutes and most trust instruments have a merger clause Disadvantages: A trust merger involves the Trustee’s exercise of its independent discretion Delaware trustee must accept its appointment prior to the merger Jurisdiction – Any jurisdictional concerns may not be raised until a challenge is brought No material change in beneficial interest permitted – lack of case law in DE

17 Court Order Advantages:
Relatively Quick Process – Oder typically issued within 2 weeks of filing Trustee is not exercising discretion Disadvantages: Increase costs – Court filing fees Appointment of Trustee prior to modification – DE trustee serving as full trustee for period before court order

18 Administrative Power of Amendment
Advantages: Quickest, easiest and lowest risk option for Trustees Lower Costs Disadvantages: Trustees should review the scope of the power and who holds the power Make sure certain tax results are not jeopardized Make sure settlor’s intent is fulfilled

19 Risks Primary risks associated with any trust modification is the risk that some beneficiary may sue the trustee for breach of trust in the future because the trustee caused, or participated in a change to the terms of the trust that ultimately caused some harm to the trust fund or beneficiary. (Example: Trustee decants to change to a directed trust and trust assets drop in value significantly.") Court Order – least risk option for trustees Change of beneficial interest Risk of serving as trustee prior to pending modifications becoming effective

20 Delaware Supreme Court Peierls Decision
Delaware law will govern the law of administration of any trust that allows for the appointment of a successor trustee (without geographic limitation) in Delaware Ability to appoint a Delaware trustee reflects the settlor’s implied intent that Delaware law will govern the administration of the trust following appointment Delaware law will not govern administration if (1) the governing law provision expressly states that the law of the original jurisdiction will always govern administration, or (2) where the governing instrument does not provide any ability to appoint a successor trustee or the appointment clause is limited to one located in the original jurisdiction.

21 Delaware Supreme Court Peierls Decision
Once a Delaware trustee is appointed and administers the trust, Delaware law governs administration and a trust can avail itself of all advantages pertaining to Delaware administration including: Can utilize Delaware’s decanting, merger or NJSA statute; Total return unitrust conversions and power to adjust; Delaware’s prudent investor rule, directed trust statutes; Permissible affiliated investments, trustee compensation; Trustee releases, virtual representation, etc.

22 Moving trusts Some Uniform Act States with nonjudical settlement agreement statutes: Alabama §§19-3B-101 Arkansas §§ Arizona Title 28 §§ District of Columbia §§ Florida §§ Kansas §§ 58a-101 Illinois §§760 Iowa Title 15 §633A.6308 Maine §§18-B, §§111, 411 Massachusetts Chapter 203E, Article 1, § 111 Michigan §§7111 MCL § Minnesota Chapter 501B. §154 Missouri §§ Nebraska §§ New Hampshire Chapter 564-B Uniform Trust Code New Jersey §§3B:31-11 New Mexico §§46A-1-111 North Carolina §§36C-1-101 North Dakota §§ Ohio §§ Oregon §§ § UTC 111 Pennsylvania 20 Pa. Cons. Stat. §§ South Carolina Title 62 §§ Tennessee §§ Utah Title 75, Ch. 07: §§ Virginia §§ Vermont Title 14A §§101 (§§111 & 411) Washington RWC Wisconsin With consent of settlor §701.12 Wyoming §§

23 State fiduciary income tax
Delaware does not impose state income taxes on an irrevocable trust’s accumulated earnings and capital gains if there are no beneficiaries living in Delaware. Several other states also do not tax income or capital gains. The income tax treatment varies widely from state to state. The following factors determine the taxation of trusts for state fiduciary income tax purposes: If the trust was created by the Will of a testator who lived in the state at death; If the trust is administered in the state; If one or more trustees live or do business in the state; If the trustor of an inter vivos trust lived in the state when he or she placed assets in the trust or when the trust became irrevocable; or If one or more noncontingent beneficiaries live in the state.

24 Roadblocks Challenges to moving trusts From the client’s perspective:
Lack of appropriate language in document Uncooperative trustees Uncooperative beneficiaries Court intervention State laws Cost of moving Fee Issues Lack of understanding of Delaware or other state benefits Application of multiple state laws to trusts From the trustee’s perspective: Administrative Situs – Peierls case Decanting and Merger – Potential trustee liability Court intervention State laws Cost of moving Application of multiple state laws to trusts Other – consents, releases etc.

25


Download ppt "Current Challenges of Fiduciary Administration in an Era of Multi- Jurisdiction Practice – Changing Trust Situs Thomas M Forrest U.S. Trust Company of."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google