Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

IREU 407 Comparative Politics Politics and Society: Political Culture, Political Communication, Political Economy (Chapters 6, 7, 8) Dr. Dragoş C. MATEESCU.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "IREU 407 Comparative Politics Politics and Society: Political Culture, Political Communication, Political Economy (Chapters 6, 7, 8) Dr. Dragoş C. MATEESCU."— Presentation transcript:

1 IREU 407 Comparative Politics Politics and Society: Political Culture, Political Communication, Political Economy (Chapters 6, 7, 8) Dr. Dragoş C. MATEESCU 17 august 2019

2 Examples of TERMS OF COMPARISON
The relations between state and the society (political freedoms; freedom of the media; free-market conditions); specific policies. The types of electoral and party systems and the condition of interest groups, with a focus on the freedom, fairness and representativeness of elections, and the actual representation of the people in the decision-making (law-making) process; The systems of checks and balances between powers (legislative, executive, judiciary) in different political systems and the independence of the judiciary; corruption. The type of government (presidential, parliamentary, and semi- presidential) and the accountability of the executive (transparency, responsibility to the legislative, other limitations to the executive power); unitary and/or federal systems; bureaucracies. sâmbătă, 17 august 2019

3 Political Culture UNESCO 2002 definition (p. 104 in textbook): a set of distinctive spiritual, material, intellectual and emotional features of society or a social group [encompasing], in addition to art and literature, lifestyles, ways of living together, value systems, traditions and beliefs. Political culture: overall pattern of beliefs, attitudes and values in a society towards the political system. Culture ≠ Nature Culture = Ideology?? Political culture (long term values) ≠ political opinion (specific, short term reaction). Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba, Civic Culture (1963). 17 august 2019

4 Political Culture – Civic Culture (Almond and Verba)
5000 interviews between 1959 and 1960 in the US, UK, West Germany, Italy, and Mexico. Three main types of political culture: participant, subject, parochial, and mixtures of these. Main parameters: knowledge/understanding of and expectations from the political system. Political culture (long term values) ≠ political opinion (specific, short term reaction). A country’s political culture changes more slowly than its public opinions, and certain underlying elements of political culture persist for generations, perhaps for centuries. 17 august 2019

5 Political Culture – Civic Culture (Almond and Verba)
Three crucial questions: What impact do people feel that government has on their lives? What obligations do people feel that they had towards the government? What do people expect from the government? INPUT OUTPUT August 17, 2019

6 MODEL OF A POLITICAL SYSTEM
OUTPUTS (laws, policies, regulations, court decisions, etc.) INPUTS (demands, support, apathy) POLITICAL SYSTEM FEEDBACK Important names: David Easton, Gabriel Almond, Sidney Verba 17 august 2019

7 The Civic Culture by Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba
Dimensions of political orientation The System as general object Input objects Output objects Self as object Cognition Affect Evaluation August 17, 2019

8 The Civic Culture by Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba
Types of political culture The System as general object Input objects Output objects Self as active participant Parochial Subject 1 Participant But there is no “pure” political culture in any society! August 17, 2019

9 Civic Culture (Almond and Verba)
A mix of parochial, subject and participant political cultures: active majorities but passive (parochial or subject) minorities. 17 august 2019

10 Political Trust, Social Capital
Robert Putnam’s study of Italy: positive (North Italy) vs. Negative (South Italy) political cultures. Positive political culture: a tradition of trust and cooperation resulting in high levels of social capital. Social capital: a culture of trust and cooperation which makes collective action possible; it enables a community to build political insitutions with a capacity to solve collective problems. 17 august 2019

11 Extremes Political culture and social capital in: Allienation
Authoritarian (including totalitarian) states Illiberal democracies Allienation Elitism: plural societies; consociational democracies; elite compromise 17 august 2019

12 Examples of TERMS OF COMPARISON
The relations between state and the society (political freedoms; freedom of the media; free-market conditions); specific policies. The types of electoral and party systems and the condition of interest groups, with a focus on the freedom, fairness and representativeness of elections, and the actual representation of the people in the decision-making (law-making) process; The systems of checks and balances between powers (legislative, executive, judiciary) in different political systems and the independence of the judiciary; corruption. The type of government (presidential, parliamentary, and semi- presidential) and the accountability of the executive (transparency, responsibility to the legislative, other limitations to the executive power); unitary and/or federal systems. sâmbătă, 17 august 2019

13 Political Communication
Communication: key political activity. Communication is politics. 17 august 2019

14 Media effects in liberal democracies (pp. 128-134 in textbook)
Reinforcement Agenda-setting Framing Priming 17 august 2019

15 Public Opinion Definition (p. 134 in textbook)
Measuring public opinion: Opinion poll Sample survey Focus group Deliberative opinion poll 17 august 2019

16 Political communication
See the case of Spain (pp ). See p. xvi in textbook for sources helping comparative analysis. Check also the rich information at 17 august 2019

17 Political communication
Central question: WHO CONTROLS COMMUNICATION? How do we ask this question though??????? Five components of political communication: Sender (who?) Message (what?) Channel (how?) Receiver (to whom?) Impact (with what effect?) Freedom of speech Freedom of thought Freedom of communication means (media, telecom, etc.) Local political culture (tendencies in courts regarding political communication) Level of systemic transparency 17 august 2019

18 The media in authoritarian states
Limiting media freedom by declaring states of emergency Restrictive licensing of publications and journalists Heavy taxation of printing and distribution equipment Various forms of censorship Restricted access to newsprint Threats of losing government subsidies and/or advertising Poor (too restrictive or too permisive) libel laws State propaganda dominates the media content 17 august 2019

19 The media in illiberal democracies
See the case of Russia (pp in textbook). 17 august 2019

20 Political Economy State (politics) – Market (economy)
Adam Smith ( ); John Maynard Keynes ( ); Milton Friedman ( ). Liberalism? Social-Democracy? Socialism? The focus of comparative politics is NOT the ideological approaches in different states, but the traditional relations between the state and the market there. Political economic culture. 17 august 2019

21 Political Economy Varieties of capitalism (see pp. 146-149):
liberal market economy; coordinated market economy. Shareholder capitalism (US tradition) Stakeholder capitalism (German tradition) Developmental state (South Korea, Japan) The convergence thesis Political economies of authoritarian states: command economies (debate theme on p in textbook) Rentier states Political economies of illiberal democracies (see the case of Venezuela, pp ) 17 august 2019

22 Regimes Liberal democracy (Hague and Harrop 2007, p. 44):
“A version of representative democracy in which the scope of democracy is limited by the constitutional protection of individual rights, including freedom of assembly, belief, speech and property.” Limited state authority in relation with individual (rights). These include freedom of thought, expression, speech, protest, the freedom to work and perform economic activities. (Think Locke’s theorisation!) 17 august 2019

23 Regimes Liberal democracy (Hague and Harrop 2007, p. 49):
It is a compromise, which requires a culture of compromise. “By definition, liberal democracy is limited government. The goal is to secure individual liberty [...]. In this way, the population can be defended against its rulers and minorities can be protected from democracy’s inherent risk: tyranny by the majority (Held 2006).” 17 august 2019

24 Regimes Illiberal democracy (Hague and Harrop 2007, p. 44):
“A version of representative democracy in which rulers, once elected, govern with few limits and little respect for individual rights. To assist re-election, the president ensures favourable media coverage and often harasses political opponents, precluding any need to falsify the count [of votes]”. Falsification of votes can also be found. 17 august 2019

25 Regimes Illiberal democracy (Hague and Harrop 2007, p. 49):
“In this type of regime, the elected ruler or rulers pay little attention to individual rights, at least when dealing with political opponents. [...] democracy does not extent far beyond the election itself. Even the election outcome is conditioned by the ruler’s influence over the media and by the use of state resources to favour his own organisation [...]”. Also called electoral democracy, or semi- democracy. Or, electoral authoritarianism. 17 august 2019

26 Regimes Illiberal democracy (Hague and Harrop 2007, pp. 49-51):
Limited sense of constitutional limitations for the ruler(s). Powerful leadership, personalised. Weak judiciary, particularly regarding the protection of individual rights. State intervention in the market. Partly free society, partly free market. 17 august 2019

27 17 august 2019

28 Regimes Authoritarian regimes (Hague and Harrop 2007, pp. 61-81):
Any form of non-democratic (representative) rule. Unlimited power placed in the hands of a leader, usually supported by a single, centralised group (party). Leaders seek to preserve power by limiting the scope of law and the participation of the people in politics. Explicit and implied (unspoken) limits. 17 august 2019

29 Regimes Authoritarian regimes (Hague and Harrop 2007, pp. 61-81):
Ineffective judiciary and legislative. Oppression of the powerless, especially minorities (ethnic, religious), intellectuals and women. Media dominated by the state authority. Weak protection of the private property. Low level of public trust in the state = low legitimacy. Vulnerable state (high risk of instability). High spending with the protection of the state (internal and external security). 17 august 2019

30 17 august 2019

31 17 august 2019

32 TERMS OF COMPARISON (examples)
The relations between state and the society (political freedoms; freedom of the media; free-market conditions); specific policies. The types of electoral and party systems and the condition of interest groups, with a focus on the freedom, fairness and representativeness of elections, and the actual representation of the people in the decision-making (law-making) process; The systems of checks and balances between powers (legislative, executive, judiciary) in different political systems and the independence of the judiciary; corruption. The type of government (presidential, parliamentary, and semi- presidential) and the accountability of the executive (transparency, responsibility to the legislative, other limitations to the executive power); unitary and federal state systems; bureaucratic traditions. sâmbătă, 17 august 2019

33 L E J IDEAL TYPE The political system OUTPUTS INPUTS POLITICAL SYSTEM
DEMANDS INPUTS DECISIONS OUTPUTS SUPPORT J FEEDBACK IDEAL TYPE DAVID EASTON sâmbătă, 17 august 2019

34 INSTITUTIONALISATION - BUREAUCRACY
Toward LAW POLITICS DEBATES POLICY L E ISSUE- ORIENTED STRATEGIES POWER STRATEGIES WORDS CONFLICTUAL DEBATES AIMS/TARGETS MEASURES/OBJECTIVES From WORDS to FACTS IMPLEMENTATION CONFLICT CRISIS VIOLENCE INSTITUTIONALISATION - BUREAUCRACY BUDGET FACTS INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL (plus Courts of Justice/Audit) J RESPONSIBILITY/ACCOUNTABILITY sâmbătă, 17 august 2019sâmbătă, 17 august 2019

35 CAUSES (including historical background) EVIDENCE:
RELEVANT LEGISLATION (LAW) LAW IMPLEMENTATION (EXAMPLES) ACADEMIC INTERPRETATION YOUR EVALUATION 17 august 2019

36 Next Political participation, elections and voters, interest groups, political parties 17 august 2019


Download ppt "IREU 407 Comparative Politics Politics and Society: Political Culture, Political Communication, Political Economy (Chapters 6, 7, 8) Dr. Dragoş C. MATEESCU."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google