Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

COMPTON SCATTERING IN FORWARD DIRECTION

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "COMPTON SCATTERING IN FORWARD DIRECTION"— Presentation transcript:

1 COMPTON SCATTERING IN FORWARD DIRECTION
PROGRESS REPORT PAWEL AMBROZEWICZ NC A&T

2 GOAL – EXTRACT COMPTON CROSS SECTION WITH GOOD PRECISION
KINEMATIC TOOLS EVENT SELECTION YIELD FITS SIMULATION CROSS SECTIONS SUMMARY

3 RECONSTRUCTED QUANTITIES:
KINEMATICS MEASURED QUANTITIES: ENERGY OF INCIDENT PARTICLES POSITIONS AT HyCal FOR BOTH PARTICLES ENERGIES OF SCATTERED PARTICLES RECONSTRUCTED QUANTITIES: DISTANCE TO TARGET (Z): REQUIRES KNOWLEDGE OF x, y, E FOR BOTH CLUSTERS ENERGY DIFFERENCE ( E(TAGGER) - E(E1, E2, ) ): REQUIRES KNOWLEDGE OF ENERGIES FOR BOTH CLUSTERS AND OPENING ANGLE

4 CO-PLANARITY |-180o|<25o FIDUCIAL REGION OF HyCal :
EVENT SELECTION: COINCIDENCE TIMING < 3.2 ns CO-PLANARITY |-180o|<25o FIDUCIAL REGION OF HyCal : 2+ INNER CRYSTAL LAYERS OUTERMOST CRYSTAL LAYER “CRISS-CROSS” PAIR PRODUCTION CUT ’e’ OPENING ANGLE  RMIN > 18.5 cm

5 EVENT SELECTION: MINIMAL OPENING ANGLE/ MINIMAL SEPARATION CUT
ADDITIONAL CUTS SERVE TO MINIMIZE SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO TIMING CUT AFTER ALIGNMENT

6

7 RADIATIVE EFFECTS NEED TO BE
ACCOUNTED FOR

8 TYPICAL DATA YIELD FITS

9 SIMULATION: GENERATES SIMPLE GEOMETRIC ACCEPTANCE
APPLIES POSITION SMEAR TO REPRODUCE EXPERIMENTAL RESOLUTIONS ACCOUNTS FOR THE BEAM POSITION OFFSETS

10 SIMULATION ACCEPTANCE DEPENDENCE ON BEAM POSITION SHIFTS

11

12

13 ONGOING PARALLEL ANALYSIS – KELLI HARDY
MAIN DIFFERENCES: FITS ONLY ENERGY DIFFERENCE USES EMPTY TARGET AS BACKGROUND MODEL DOES NOT REMOVE PAIR PRODUCTION EVENTS USES GEANT TO GENERATE ACCEPTANCE

14 SYSTEMATIC ERROR ESTIMATION
STATISTICAL ERROR < 0.5% SYSTEMATIC ERROR ESTIMATION PHOTON FLUX % TARGET THICKNESS % BACKGROUND SUBTRACTION % ACCEPTANCE ~2.0% STABILITY (CALIBRATIONS) ~2.0% TOTAL ~5%

15 SUMMARY COMPTON CROSS SECTION HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FOR LARGE PORTION OF THE DATA – INDEPENDENT ANALYSES IN GOOD AGREEMENT STUDY SHOWS THAT STABILITY OF THE CROSS SECTION IS ~5% TO IMPROVE PRECISION MONTE CARLO SIMULATION HAS TO BE REFINED – CORRECTING FOR RADIATIVE EFFECTS NECESSARY REMAINING COMPTON DATA HAS TO BE ANALYZED … ANALYSIS NOTE – WORK IN PROGRESS …


Download ppt "COMPTON SCATTERING IN FORWARD DIRECTION"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google