1. Cumulative density curves describe network-wide effects of conditioning. a, Acont distribution for all conditioning sessions for the two site pairs depicted in Figures 7 and 8 showing the percentage change in EP amplitude from all sites except B and C for w...
Cumulative density curves describe network-wide effects of conditioning. a, Acont distribution for all conditioning sessions for the two site pairs depicted in Figures 7 and 8 showing the percentage change in EP amplitude from all sites except B and C for which stimulation at site A evokes a response; arrowhead denotes mean (+4.0%, n = 146 EPs, p < 0.001) and dotted lines indicated the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles, which are recapitulated in Figure 9. b, Acont distribution depicted as a cumulative density (purple) superimposed with the cumulative density of percentage change in A→B EPs (green) from all delays depicted in Figure 9. Light-colored shadows indicate the 95% confidence interval. c, Bcont distribution (mean = +1.3%, n = 143 EPs, p = 0.2), as in a. d, Bcont distribution cumulative density (green) compared with cumulative density of percentage change in B→A EPs (purple), as in b. Bottom right, Significance matrix for all effects: on-diagonal quadrants indicate p-value of Acont and Bcont means compared with zero (one-sample t test); off-diagonal quadrants indicate comparison of the directed connection with the control distribution in the same row (two-sample K–S test).
Stephanie C. Seeman et al. J. Neurosci. 2017;37:
©2017 by Society for Neuroscience