Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Multiplying Impact Team
Chart Templates Multiplying Impact Team
2
Summary of Charts and their Roles (from easy to hard)
Part of a whole Donut Chart Stacked Bar Chart Treemap Comparison of 2 numbers Bar Chart Slopegraph Back-to-Back Char Dot Plot Chart Comparison of more than 2 numbers People graph Heatmap Lollipop Chart Comparison with target Benchmark Chart Overlapping Bar Chart Surveys Diverging Stacked Bars Chart Small Multiple Graphs Back-to-Back Chart Correlation Scatterplot Chart Change over time Line Chart Area Chart Percent change Funnel Variation Error Bars Chart Standard Deviation Graph
3
Donut Chart The Donut Chart shows the numerical proportion to a whole
Input: A 27% B 63%
4
Bar Chart The Bar Chart shows categorical data grouped into discrete groups Input: Regions % of Projects A 10% B 15% C 18% D 50% E 57% F 59% G 100%
5
Stacked Bar Chart The Stacked Bar Chart shows the data’s proportion of values they represent while comparing across grouped data Input: Intensive Advocacy Moderate Advocacy Little or No Advocacy Region A 20% 67% 4% Region B 42% 12% Region C 60% Region D 38% 40% 10% Region E 55% 15% 30%
6
Diverging Stacked Bar Chart
The Diverging Stacked Bar Chart shows comparison between categorical data Input: Transformational Responsive Accommodating Tokenistic Unaware Outcome Area 1 16% 25% 44% 8% 7% Outcome Area 2 60% 10% Outcome Area 3 35% 20% 15% 5%
7
Error Bar Chart Error Bars show the variability of data. They indicate the error or uncertainty in a reported measurement Input: Means CI Range Program A 35.0% 10% Program B 30.0% 7% Program C 40.0% 5%
8
Line Chart The Line Chart shows the trend overtime Input: 2011 2012
2013 2014 2015 Project A $ $ $ $ $ Project B $ $ $ $ $ Project C $ $ $ $ $ Project D $ $ $ $ Project E $ $ $
9
Area Chart The Area Chart shows the magnitude of change overtime
Input: 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Project A $ $ $ $ $ Project B $ $ $ $ $ Project C $ $ $ $ $ Project D $ $ $ $ Project E $ $ $
10
Benchmark chart The Benchmark chart shows comparison between benchmarks and actual data Input: Performance Benchmark Project A 55% 50% Project B 58% Project C 67%
11
Funnel Chart Shows progressive stages of increase or decrease proportions of data Input: FY # of Participants FY1 750 FY2 1100 FY3 2800 FY4 2500 FY5 3300
12
# of Little or No Advocacy Projects
Heatmap Chart The Heatmap Chart shows variance across multiple variables in order to display patterns Input: # of Intensive Advocacy Projects # of Moderate # of Little or No Advocacy Projects Region A 128 768 33 Region B 97 585 276 Region C 63 750 122 Region D 180 89 208 Region E 172 210 278 # Intensive Advocacy Projects # Moderate Advocacy Projects # Little or No Advocacy Projects Region A 128 768 33 Region B 97 585 276 Region C 63 750 122 Region D 180 89 208 Region E 172 210 278
13
People Graph The People Graph shows the comparison between variables
Input: # of Participants Region A 3000 Region B 2000 Region C 1000
14
Overlapping Bars The Overlapping Bar Chart shows comparison between two groups sharing the same parameters Input: Target Actual A 24.6% 22.9% B 24.1% 21.8% C 6.3% 3.7% D 5.4% 6.0% E 4.2% 6.1%
15
Small Multiple Graphs Small Multiple Graphs facilitates comparison between multiple groups of data
16
Treemap Chart The Treemap Chart shows hierarchical data as a set of nested rectangles, which has an area proportional to a specified dimension on the data, to facilitate comparison Input: Country Project Participants Country A Project 1 79 Project 2 86 Project 3 179 Country B Project 4 89 Project 5 121 Project 6 73 Country C Project 7 124 Project 8 105 Project 9 53 Country D Project 10 65 Project 11 140 Project 12 150 Country E Project 13 166 Project 14 Project 15 83
17
Back-to-Back Chart The Back-to-Back Chart shows comparison between two groups sharing the same parameters (In this example, teachers and principals who responded to a survey ) Input: Principals Teachers Teachers hold principals accountable. 44% 40% Principals support teacher decisions. 73% 75% School climate is positive. 76% 65% Teachers give individualized care to students. 77% 85% Principals hold teachers accountable. 82% 78% Staff have camradarie. 86% 80% Support staff are treated well. 95% 96% Principals listen to teacher concerns.
18
Slope Chart The Slope Chart shows how one category decreased when others increased The Slope Chart also shows that one increased at a rate much faster than the others Input: Budget in 2007 Budget in 2017 Project A $50 $57 Project B $74 $80 Project C $60 $65 Project D $67 $64 Project E $82 $88 Project F $61 $72
19
Scatterplot Chart The Scatterplot Chart shows correlation between data
Input: Projects Country Budget $ # Participants Project 1 Country A 1000 442 Project 2 3600 933 Project 3 400 584 Project 4 Country B 1700 957 Project 5 2800 680 Project 6 3461 1226 Project 7 Country C 3166 1254 Project 8 2239 577 Project 9 2576 1106 Project 10 Country D 3002 682 Project 11 1084 1007 Project 12 2304 962 Project 13 Country E 1856 663 Project 14 1347 1092 Project 15 2782 720
20
Standard Deviation Chart
The Standard Deviation Chart shows much the individual sample data set vary from the mean (or average) of the data. Input: The gray area represents the standard deviation The darker line indicates average scores Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 means 52% 57% 60% 63% stddev upper range 66% 70% 73% 75% lower range 39% 44% 47% 50% 51% full range 27% 26% 25% 24%
21
Lollipop Chart The Lollipop Chart shows comparison between categorical data Input: Marker % Projects Harmful 9% Responsive 21% Transformative 34% Neutral 46% Sensitive 67%
22
Dot Plot Chart The Dot Plot Chart shows the distribution and comparison of data Input: FY1 Participants FY2 Paricipants DOT SPACING Project A 34 69 2.5 Project B 63 77 1.5 Project C 67 75 2 Project D 92 98 1 Project E 96 100 0.5
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.