Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKlaudia Piasecka Modified over 5 years ago
1
The results of the analysis for rates of symptomatic IDH, asymptomatic IDH, and symptoms alone remained consistent with the primary analysis. The results of the analysis for rates of symptomatic IDH, asymptomatic IDH, and symptoms alone remained consistent with the primary analysis. Symptomatic IDH rate did not differ between the run-in and the biofeedback period (P=0.12), but decreased between the run-in and the control period (P=0.01). There was no difference between the biofeedback and the control period (P=0.29). Asymptomatic IDH rate did not differ between the run-in and the biofeedback period (P=0.77) or the run-in and the control period (P=0.83); there were no differences between the biofeedback and the control period (P=0.64). Symptoms alone rate did not differ between the run-in and the biofeedback period (P=0.20) or the run-in and the control period (P=0.64); there were no differences between the biofeedback and the control period (P=0.37). IDH, intradialytic hypotension. Kelvin C.W. Leung et al. CJASN 2017;12: ©2017 by American Society of Nephrology
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.