Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The results of the analysis for rates of symptomatic IDH, asymptomatic IDH, and symptoms alone remained consistent with the primary analysis. The results.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The results of the analysis for rates of symptomatic IDH, asymptomatic IDH, and symptoms alone remained consistent with the primary analysis. The results."— Presentation transcript:

1 The results of the analysis for rates of symptomatic IDH, asymptomatic IDH, and symptoms alone remained consistent with the primary analysis. The results of the analysis for rates of symptomatic IDH, asymptomatic IDH, and symptoms alone remained consistent with the primary analysis. Symptomatic IDH rate did not differ between the run-in and the biofeedback period (P=0.12), but decreased between the run-in and the control period (P=0.01). There was no difference between the biofeedback and the control period (P=0.29). Asymptomatic IDH rate did not differ between the run-in and the biofeedback period (P=0.77) or the run-in and the control period (P=0.83); there were no differences between the biofeedback and the control period (P=0.64). Symptoms alone rate did not differ between the run-in and the biofeedback period (P=0.20) or the run-in and the control period (P=0.64); there were no differences between the biofeedback and the control period (P=0.37). IDH, intradialytic hypotension. Kelvin C.W. Leung et al. CJASN 2017;12: ©2017 by American Society of Nephrology


Download ppt "The results of the analysis for rates of symptomatic IDH, asymptomatic IDH, and symptoms alone remained consistent with the primary analysis. The results."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google