1. Evaluation of the uterine cavity with magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal sonography, hysterosonographic examination, and diagnostic hysteroscopy 
Margit Dueholm, M.D., Erik Lundorf, M.D., Estrid S Hansen, M.D., Susanne Ledertoug, M.D., Frede Olesen, M.D. 
Fertility and Sterility 
Volume 76, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
DOI: /S (01)

2. Figure 1
Submucous myoma visualized at MRI with measurement of submucous myoma in-growth. B is the diameter of myoma measured perpendicular to a line at the uterine cavity boarder. A is the distance from the surface line to the maximum point in the uterine cavity. Calculations:
Total myoma volume=1/6 π B3
Volume of myoma in the uterine cavity=π A2 (B/2−A/3).
Proportion of in-growth (%)=π A2 (B/2−A/3) / 1/6 π B3.
Dueholm. Evaluation of the uterine cavity. Fertil Steril 2001.
Fertility and Sterility  , DOI: ( /S (01) )

3. Figure 2 Submucous myomas seen at HSE.
Dueholm. Evaluation of the uterine cavity. Fertil Steril 2001.
Fertility and Sterility  , DOI: ( /S (01) )

4. Figure 3 A submucous myoma and several intramural myomas seen at MRI.
Dueholm. Evaluation of the uterine cavity. Fertil Steril 2001.
Fertility and Sterility  , DOI: ( /S (01) )

5. Figure 4
A polyp in the uterine cavity identified at MRI as a faint lower signal intensity shadow in the high intensity endometrium. Large myomas of low signal intensity are seen in the posterior uterine wall.
Dueholm. Evaluation of the uterine cavity. Fertil Steril 2001.
Fertility and Sterility  , DOI: ( /S (01) )