1. Local Control and Accountability Plan Update Board of Education
November 14, 2017
Lisa Kotowski
Josephine Fierro

2. 2017-18 LCAP Upcoming Meetings
LCAP Meetings
Date
Meeting
Topic
September 18, 2017
LCAP Committee
Update and input
October 19, 2017
Supervisors
October 25, 2017
LPPA
November 6, 2017
November 8, 2017
EL LCAP Committee
LCAP Upcoming Meetings
Date
Meeting
Topic
November 28, 2017
CSEA
Update and input
January 23, 2018
Community Forum – Stockton
Input
January 25, 2018
Community Forum – Lodi
February 7, 2018
EL LCAP
Annual update and input
February 12, 2018
LCAP Committee
April 4, 2018
EL Committee
Draft and input
April 9, 2018
222

3. LCAP Committee Meeting Input September 18, 2017
Agenda
Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP)
-Survey Results
-Input
The top five topics in random order:
Cleanliness
Safety
College and Career
Parental involvement
Additional staff (counselors, classified support)
Attendance:
Parents:
Staff/Parents
Staff

4. Supervisors Meeting Input October 19, 2017
The top three topics in random order:
Professional Development for staff
Safety measures
Communication
Consistency
Security
Parent communication
Website will be updated
Aeries parent portal
Blackboard Connect

5. LPPA Meeting Input October 25, 2017
Supporting documents and articles are available upon request.
Counselors
Psychologists
Nurses
Speech Therapists
Increase 3 FTE
Request 3 HS counselors (lower high school ratios would be able to do: 4 year plans, structured lessons, develop relationships with students, parents and community)
To support the following State Priorities:
Parent Involvement
Pupil Achievement
School Climate
Course Access
Other Pupil Outcomes
Pupil Engagement
Unfilled FTE
Need to be fully staffed
More competitive
Very involved with SPED, but not able to move with general education
PBIS: want to be a part of teams (secondary psychologists)
Support to State Priorities: parent involvement, parent meetings, trainings, etc.
Student engagement
Increase nursing staff
Nursing Services for perhaps preventative care (obesity, handwashing)
State Priorities #5: Pupil Engagement
Increase in testing budget
Increase staff
Parent involvement

6. LCAP Committee Meeting Input November 6, 2018
Agenda
Welcome and introductions
Evaluation Data
Input
Attendance:
Parents:
Staff/Parents
Staff
Community

7. Section 2.2: All students including targeted students will demonstrate proficiency in literacy, mathematics and technology to prepare students to be college and career ready. All: Increase percentage of students meeting proficiency (+2.0%) English Learners: Increase percentage meeting proficiency at a greater rate than all students (-3.6%) Low Income: Increase percentage meeting proficiency at a greater rate than all students (+1.8%) * * *
5585 / 16634
Increased 3.6 % to over 40% Meeting or Exceeding Standards. (State declined 5%!) Difficult to meet EL goal as reclassified students as of the last day of testing, are not in this targeted group! Highest achieving EL scores not included as they were reclassified!
3064 / 11731
4224 / 16634
2197 / 11731
14 / 108
338 / 3965
192 / 2194
344 / 3965
166 / 2194
9 / 108
* Goal Met
* Goal Not Met, but progress made
* Goal Not Met, decline
* Proficiency = Score of Standard Met or Standard Exceeded
LUSD Data

8. Section 2.2: All students including targeted students will demonstrate proficiency in literacy, mathematics and technology to prepare students to be college and career ready. All: Increase percentage of students meeting proficiency (+1.7%) English Learners: Increase percentage meeting proficiency at a greater rate than all students (-2.5%) Low Income: Increase percentage meeting proficiency at a greater rate than all students (+1.0%) * * *
5585 / 16634
Increased 2.6%
3064 / 11731
4224 / 16634
2197 / 11731
14 / 108
338 / 3965
192 / 2194
344 / 3965
166 / 2194
9 / 108
* Goal Met
* Goal Not Met, but progress made
* Goal Not Met, decline
LUSD Data
* Proficiency = Score of Standard Met or Standard Exceeded

9. Section 2.2: All students including targeted students will demonstrate proficiency in literacy, mathematics and technology to prepare students to be college and career ready. All: Increase percentage of students meeting proficiency (+ 0.4%) English Learners: Increase percentage meeting proficiency at a greater rate than all students (- 2.9%) Low Income: Increase percentage meeting proficiency at a greater rate than all students (- 0.8%) * * *
6400 / 6266
1861 / 4117
3252 / 6946
SCIENCE DATA unavailable as was the new CAST, aligned to NGSS, pilot year.
1889 / 4772
218 / 647
218 / 860
9 / 44
* Goal Met
* Goal Not Met, but progress made
* Goal Not Met, decline
179 / 1038
246 / 1434
LUSD Data

10. Section 2.2: All students including targeted students will demonstrate proficiency in literacy, mathematics and technology to prepare students to be college and career ready. All Students: Increase number of “ready” students in ELA or Math by 5% (ELA= + 28%) *
EAP embedded into the SBA. In order to be considered students must have scored in the “Exceeded Standard” range.
Each spring, all grade eleven students in California take the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics. These assessments, which are administered as part of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System, also serve as an indicator of readiness for college-level coursework in English and mathematics and are used by the California State University (CSU) and participating California Community Colleges (CCCs) to determine Early Assessment Program (EAP) status
* Goal Met
* Goal Not Met, but progress made
* Goal Not Met, decline
LUSD Data

11. Section 2.2: All students including targeted students will demonstrate proficiency in literacy, mathematics and technology to prepare students to be college and career ready. All Students: Increase number of “ready” students in ELA or Math by 5% (Math= + 58%)
* Goal Met
* Goal Not Met, but progress made
* Goal Not Met, decline *
EAP embedded into the SBA. In order to be considered students must have scored in the “Exceeded Standard” range.
LUSD Data

12. Section 2.3: LUSD schools will be positive and supportive learning environments that provide maximum opportunities for each student to succeed. All Students: Decrease suspension rate by 1% (+0.10%) *
* Goal Met
* Goal Not Met, but progress made
* Goal Not Met, decline *
*Note: Scale maximum at 50%
LUSD Data

13. Section 2.3: LUSD schools will be positive and supportive learning environments that provide maximum opportunities for each student to succeed. All Students: Maintain expulsion rate of 2% or lower (0.20%)
* Goal Met
* Goal Not Met, but progress made
* Goal Not Met, decline * *
*Note: Scale maximum at 10%
LUSD Data

14. LCAP Committee Meeting Input November 6, 2018
Common threads:
Homeless
After School Programs
Data disaggregate
-Cohort
-Subgroups

15. LCAP Committee Meeting Input November 6, 2018
Positives:
Trend is looking better
Teachers have been trained in ELD materials
Increase in Lodi High students in summer school
Implementation of CAST
High percentage of foster/homes students with “no concerns”
Growth is minimal, but on right track
Measuring the different subgroups
Comfortable with new curriculum (leads to increase in most scores and decrease in discipline)
Highly qualified teachers
Academic achievement
Suspension rates down

16. LCAP Committee Meeting Input November 6, 2017
Concerns
Provide handouts with the data
Goals 1, 2, and 3 are very small with no specific examples of how these are going to be achieved. i.e., one example on how LUSD has “promoted and created learning environments.
How do we add Goals to the LCAP? Add STEM to LCAP goals.”
Look at Cohort data: how are we doing with students we keep? How are we doing with old/new pathways?
Homeless students: how is LUSD capturing all students?
42% all students CAASPP
32% All students Math
STEM needs to be for all schools/all students
Spending too much money on technology
EL students not making progress on CELDT/CAASPP
Lack of space for summer school students: # signed up vs. accommodated
Not enough counselors at elementary schools
iRead as an intervention programs: needs direct teaching
No adequate programs for newcomers
Low percentage of students college ready with EAP scores (Math/ELA)
Lack of info on different subgroups
Facilities
Computer programs are shut off after hours
Books at home and school
Books shared in classrooms
Vague data
Reviewing individual ethnic group data
Not enough staff for ELA students during and after school
Recruiting and retaining quality teachers
Self reporting for homes: is this accurate?
How many teacher interns?
More support for EL’s to ensure growth
Foster youth significantly higher than other demographics

17. LCAP Committee Meeting Input November 6, 2017
Solutions
Increase in Summer School classes
What do school sites need?
Suggest goals and add to the LCAP
STEM at all grades
STEM supplies into the classroom
Teachers and staff identify those with a different survey
Extending afterschool tutoring
Does summer school meet needs of students (were classes closed due to no teacher)
Get rid of Common Core Math
Let students excel rather than holding them back
Improve school climate by hiring more classroom teachers and on site classified personnel
Teach children to have grit-work hard and don’t give up
Enrichment for all grades levels, summer school and afterschool
Build more classrooms
More space at sites
Increase afterschool activities
ELD PD on ELD and SDAIE strategies
Fund AVID training
Increase summer school for Elementary students
Full time READ 180 at all sites
Full time counselor at Title I and elementary schools
Peer tutoring
Computer programs accessible all times
Hire more Spanish speaking staff to help with students after school
Provide books in classrooms and at home
More info at meetings to help see the big picture
Standardized measures to show growth
Counseling services for foster youth

18. EL LCAP Committee Meeting Input November 8, 2018
Agenda
Welcome and introductions
Survey results
Evaluation Data
Input
Common threads:
Safety
Cleanliness of our facilities
Attendance:
Parents:
Staff/Parents
Staff

19. EL LCAP Committee Meeting Input November 8, 2017
Positives
Concerns
School is clean (Heritage)
Great teachers and staff show dedication to students (Heritage)
Teacher training in technology
Increase staff knowledge on the LCAP
Emphasis on English Language Development for EL students
Oakwood school does provide positive incentives (medals to students that show growth in their academics
Increase in standards
English learners:
-teachers do know English
-Students pass but don’t know
-Students may not know what the
textbook means
Dress code in Lodi Middle: not to use the color red but many student wear this color at school
District schools are unclean
School safety
Safety issues at Delta Sierra and Oakwood
Safety for children crossing the street
Covered areas for children
Vehicles can enter school at any time
Safety for all students during school
Number of reclassified students-grade level dropped
Not enough aids for English learner students

20. EL LCAP Committee Meeting Input November 8, 2017
Solutions
Teach students cleanliness
Trash pickup volunteers
Trash pickup discipline
Hire teachers that are Spanish/English speakers to help new students with no knowledge of the language
Principals should apply the dress code to everyone
Metal detectors
Campus security
Communication between parents and school regarding meetings, etc. because students do not always share that information
Professional Development on the needs of foster youth
Full time school counselor for each elementary school
Back to the basics-district wide PD on ELD and SDAIE strategies
Committee put together with parents, teachers and staff
More security on campus
Safety should be first concern at any school, however Delta Sierra is in great need

21. Next Steps

22. Questions?