Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

DeWayne T. Halfen and Lucy M. Ziurys Department of Chemistry

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "DeWayne T. Halfen and Lucy M. Ziurys Department of Chemistry"— Presentation transcript:

1 Perturbations of the Fine and Hyperfine Structure in the Pure Rotational Spectrum of VCl (X5Dr)
DeWayne T. Halfen and Lucy M. Ziurys Department of Chemistry Department of Astronomy Steward Observatory Arizona Radio Observatory University of Arizona June 21, 2004

2 Why VCl ? Few vanadium compounds studied at high resolution
Optical studies of VH, VO, VN, VF, VCl Only pure rotational spectra of any vanadium compound Microwave spectrum of VO (X4S-1/2) from 3-11 GHz (Suenram et al. 1991) Vanadium – many oxidation states Bonding trends across periodic table High melting point ~1900oC – can’t melt in Broida oven Laser ablation VOCl3 (l) or VCl4 (l) V oxidation states

3 Past Work on VCl Iacocca et al. (1970) first observed visible spectrum
No ground state determined Ram, Bernath & Davis (2001) & Ram et al. (2003) Measured several subbands of E5D-X5D transition Identified the W = 1,2,3,4 subbands, but couldn’t resolve W = 0 Subbands not regularly spaced ab initio calculations showed a 5P state very close in energy to ground state Perturb the ground state W = 0,1,2,3 subbands

4

5 Gas-Phase Synthesis of VCl
Add VCl4 Pressure: 1-2 mTorr 20 mTorr Ar gas also added AC discharge 200 W at 600 W

6 Energy Level Diagram for VCl (X5Dr)
5Dr ground state Four unpaired 3d electrons J = L + S Spin-orbit and spin-spin interactions Omega ladders W = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 J ≥ W Lambda-doubling possible Vanadium hyperfine I(51V)= 7/2 F = J + I 80 lines max. per transition J W 3 4 2 1 X5Dr J F W J+3/2 J+1/2 J+7/2 J+5/2 J-5/2 J-7/2 J-1/2 J-3/2

7 V35Cl: J = 37  38 Pattern repeats in V37Cl

8 V35Cl: J = 37  38

9 Rotational Spectrum of VCl
V35Cl (X5Dr) J = 37  38 W = 4 Lambda doubling collapsed * W = 3 W = 1 W = 2 Vanadium Hyperfine W = 0 Lambda Doubling Measured 10 rotational transitions of V35Cl and V37Cl

10 For more data, see Halfen & Ziurys 2005 J′ F′ J″ F″ nobs no-nc W = 0f
W = 0e W = 3f W = 3e 33 30.5 32 29.5 0.318 0.260 -0.011 0.019 31.5 0.315 0.236 0.037 0.013 32.5 0.213 0.180 -0.013 -0.008 33.5 0.077 0.065 0.027 -0.033 34.5 -0.195 -0.132 -0.021 -0.018 35.5 -0.625 -0.423 -0.022 36.5 -1.159 -0.831 -0.014 -0.017 W = 1f W = 1e W = 4 28.5 -0.201 -0.026 0.015 -0.113 -0.047 -0.004 -0.099 -0.005 0.006 -0.029 0.029 0.005 0.049 0.026 0.066 0.009 -0.002 0.096 -0.019 -0.023 -0.165 0.000 W = 2f W = 2e -0.192 -0.393 -0.563 -0.260 -0.670 -0.039 -0.555 0.085 -0.220 0.562 0.242 0.708 0.853 0.785 1.532 0.611 For more data, see Halfen & Ziurys 2005

11 Hyperfine Perturbations
1 2 3,4 5 6 7 8 Hyperfine Perturbations Hyperfine splittings in W = 1 Octets at lower frequencies 3 to 4 lines at higher frequencies For W = 1e, at J = 38  39 and J = 39  40, hyperfine spreads out to over MHz Hyperfine splittings in W = 2 Regular octets for both lambda doublets At J = 39  40 & J = 40  41, hf spreads out over 100 MHz for W = 2e only Evidence for perturbing state at very low energy W = 2 W = 1e

12 Spectroscopic Analysis of VCl
Hund’s case (c) scheme Each individual W component fit separately – Heff = Hrot + Hmhf Rotational constants agree well with Ram et al. (2003) h parameter doesn’t follow regular pattern – h = aL + (b+c)S Higher-order distortion constants, hH, needed for good fit ^ ^ ^ W B D H h hD hH rms 0f (73) (51) -1.88(12)E-07 4346(650) 7.06(12) (42) 0.313 0e (52) (37) -1.091(85)E-07 3959(523) 6.08(10) (34) 0.225 1f (36) (17) 276(89) -1.10(20) (53) 0.070 1e (91) (11) 2.288(41)E-07 354(67) -2.06(13) (34) 0.046 2f (20) (79) 4302(289) 4.82(37) (22) 0.613 2e (35) (15) -6.33E-08b 4439(353) 4.58(55) (28) 0.637 3f (76) (53) 1.22(12)E-08 437(31) -0.338(45) (58) 0.032 3e (15) (11) -5.24(25)E-09 456(28) -0.326(19) 0.067 4 (48) (14) 835.9(8.6) -0.259(12) (16) 0.012 a In MHz. b Held Fixed.

13 Source of Hyperfine Perturbations
A5Pr state perturbs W = 0, 1, 2, 3 components (DW = 0) Homogeneous spin-electronic perturbation W = 1 perturbed most A5P11/2mr2 L±S X5D1 f parity L-doubling components shifted lower in energy Nearby B5S- state (Ram et al. 2003) e parity components shifted to higher energy A5Pr state only ~500 cm-1 higher than X5Dr W = 1e & 2e components strongly interact Second-order spin-orbit/Fermi-contact cross term (L S)(I S) . .

14 Future Work Refine global case (a) fit for VCl Deperturbation analysis
Aso = 1226 GHz = 41 cm-1 rms = 1.3 MHz w/o W = 1 Deperturbation analysis Measure spectra of more vanadium species VF (X5Dr or X5Pr) VO (X4S-) VN (X3Dr) VH (X5Dr)


Download ppt "DeWayne T. Halfen and Lucy M. Ziurys Department of Chemistry"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google