Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

HFNC off is compared with HFNC 30 L/min and HFNC 50 L/min for tidal volume. HFNC off is compared with HFNC 30 L/min and HFNC 50 L/min for tidal volume.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "HFNC off is compared with HFNC 30 L/min and HFNC 50 L/min for tidal volume. HFNC off is compared with HFNC 30 L/min and HFNC 50 L/min for tidal volume."— Presentation transcript:

1 HFNC off is compared with HFNC 30 L/min and HFNC 50 L/min for tidal volume.
HFNC off is compared with HFNC 30 L/min and HFNC 50 L/min for tidal volume. HFNC off and HFNC 30 L/min and HFNC 50 L/min differ significantly. The HFNC group is significant, but 30 L/min and 50 L/min show no significant differences (HFNC off, HFNC 30 L/min, HFNC 50 L/min: 685.6±236.5 mL, 929.8±434.7 mL, 968.8±451.1 mL). HFNC off is compared with HFNC 30 L/min and HFNC 50 L/min for respiratory rate. HFNC off and HFNC 30 L/min and HFNC 50 L/min differ significantly. The high flow group is significantly different, but no significant difference is found between 30 L/min and 50 L/min (high Flow off, HFNC 30 L/min, HFNC 50 L/min: 15.1±2.14 bpm, 11.6±3.08 bpm, 11.1±2.29 bpm). HFNC off is compared with HFNC 30 L/min and HFNC 50 L/min for minute ventilation. High flow off does not differ significantly from high flow 30 L/min or 50 L/min (HFNC off, HFNC 30 L/min, HFNC 50 L/min: 9.77±0.62 L/min, ±3.87 L/min, ±3.94 L/min). HFNC, high-flow nasal cannula. Miyuki Okuda et al. BMJ Open Resp Res 2017;4:e000200 ©2017 by British Thoracic Society


Download ppt "HFNC off is compared with HFNC 30 L/min and HFNC 50 L/min for tidal volume. HFNC off is compared with HFNC 30 L/min and HFNC 50 L/min for tidal volume."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google