Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byΠαρθενιά Παπαφιλίππου Modified over 5 years ago
1
Munich Reinsurance America Services, Inc. Mobility Domain June 2019
Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility LossDetect® Analysis for XXXXXX Munich Reinsurance America Services, Inc. Mobility Domain June 2019
2
Smart Mobility Overview
Data & Analysis Methodology Loss Mitigation Potential / Benefits Recommendation & Next Steps Appendix
3
The problem The National Safety Council reports that there were over 40,000 traffic fatalities on U.S. roads in That is almost 5 fatalities every hour! According to the NAIC, Commercial Auto Insurers are losing money in this market, with loss ratios approaching 70%. The average cost of a loss related to a commercial fleet vehicle accident in was almost twice the cost of the average workplace injury.* * Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
4
The solution: Smart Mobility
ADVANCED FLEET MONITORING TELEMATICS AND TRACKING COLLISION AVOIDANCE DRIVER COACHING Mobile App Analytics Platform Driver / Fleet Scoring Targeted Training Modules Money Back Warranty Vehicle Diagnostics Driver and Vehicle Tracking Vehicle Warnings Detailed Analytics Crash Avoidance Visible and Audible Driver Warning System Driver and Vehicle Tracking Detailed Analytics Telematics Based Driver Coaching Inward/Outward Video Capture Option Dashboard for Fleet Oversight Driven By LossDetect™ LossDetect™ “detects” a fleet’s loss savings potential, matches it with the right technology and risk mitigation solution(s), to achieve quantifiable savings while improving safety. Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
5
What sets Smart Mobility apart from others?
1 Losses Reviewed Analyzed over $4.6bn in commercial auto losses, across 10 industries and 50 insurances entities 2 SAVINGS IDENTIFIED Over $3.2bn (approximately 70%) of the analyzed losses identified could be prevented 3 Solution Access Deployed solutions to commercial fleets across multiple industries 4 AWARDS Received Celent and Accenture awards for Innovation in Insurance 5 CREDIBILITY We are backed by Munich Re, the largest reinsurer in the world and bring our objectivity and loss analysis skills to our clients Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
6
Smart Mobility Overview
Data & Analysis Methodology Loss Mitigation Potential / Benefits Recommendation & Next Steps Appendix
7
Evaluation of commercial auto claim data
The Approach Incurred Loss and Record Counts for key categories (*inclusive of Zero incurreds) Data XXX data sets utilized Loss Data provided from based on occurrence date Number of records analyzed: XXX xxxr 27% of the records contained total incurreds of zero. 62% of which are Preventable. Total Incurred Losses range from $0 to $900k. Analysis Analysis focused on nominal losses No trending, development or adjustments Loss causes were determined based on Loss Descriptions provided Non Preventable Losses had no clear mitigation solution PREVENTABLE 1,131 PREVENTABLE 216 PREVENTABLE 165 Total Losses: $25.9m About 79% deemed Preventable Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
8
Evaluation of commercial auto claim data
Observations Total Frequency & Severity Overview Rear-End Highest incurred total, highest frequency Left Turn Highest avg. severity, 4th highest incurred total Backing Second highest frequency, low average severity Driver Error Second highest incurred total and high frequency Emergency Collisions with vehicles occurring when lights and sirens are activated Not Auto Includes injuries to passenger and collisions caused by intentional police maneuvers Results presented after eliminating records with zero incurreds. Cause of Loss Frequency Avg Severity Incurred Total REAR-END 353 $20,891 $7,374,468 DRIVER ERROR 89 $36,512 $3,249,525 INTERSECTION 73 $40,286 $2,940,844 LEFT TURN 33 $75,189 $2,481,224 UNKNOWN 93 $25,332 $2,355,846 NOT AT FAULT 61 $36,125 $2,203,634 TURNING OTHER 50 $30,775 $1,538,763 BACKING 181 $4,919 $890,303 EMERGENCY 36 $18,748 $674,915 PEDESTRIAN 10 $49,196 $491,957 LANE DEPARTURE 7 $58,782 $411,475 LANE CHANGE 30 $12,802 $384,072 MECHANICAL FAILURE 8 $42,320 $338,557 NOT AUTO 16 $15,453 $247,240 COLLIDED WITH PARKED VEHICLE 31 $3,653 $113,247 RIGHT TURN 2 $41,550 $83,099 MOTORCYCLE 1 $65,265 ROAD HAZARD 3 $18,031 $54,093 ANIMAL 9 $3,256 $29,300 SIDESWIPE $3,019 $21,131 COLLIDED WITH OBJECT 4 $4,591 $18,362 SLID $4,391 $17,563 WEATHER $3,211 BICYCLIST $356 $711 TOWING $147 $293 Grand Total 1,106 $23,498 $25,989,100 Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
9
Smart Mobility Overview
Data & Analysis Methodology Loss Mitigation Potential / Benefits Recommendation & Next Steps Appendix
10
Mitigation tools & savings potential
Associated Payments Claim Type Mitigation Tool(s) Driver Error, Right, Left & Other Turning, Intersection Collision Driver Training $10,293,748 Rear-end $7,374,468 Forward Collision Warning Total Prevention Potential (does not account for savings potential from the Not Auto Category due to earlier warnings or smoother operation) Preventable Excludes those items deemed *potentially preventable $23.1m Unknown, Collided with Parked Vehicle, Head-on, Passing $2,469,094 Potentially Preventable* Backing $890,303 Rear Backup Camera $20.6m Emergency $674,916 HAAS Emergency Alert Lane Departure and Sideswipe $432,607 Lane Departure Warning Lane Change $384,072 Blind Spot Monitoring Slid $17,563 Traction Control Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019 10
11
Additional direct benefits for XXXXXXX
Loss savings accrue directly to the insureds as real dollars based on retention, quickly outweighing mitigation costs. Reduced claims and claims processing costs associated with less incidents. Vehicles and drivers remain on the road, maximizing fleet effectiveness. Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
12
Indirect benefits for XXXXXXX
Operational efficiencies can be realized through better fleet oversight, reduced fuel costs through less idle time, geo-fencing, route optimization. With Mobileye/Geotab telematics, roadside assistance is included for each outfitted vehicle. Potential reduction in Worker Compensation claims caused by driver injury as well as economic loss (lost wages). Enhanced ability to limit settlement payments and fraud through more accurate incident data, Not At Fault Category $2.2m. Reduction in passenger injuries (Not Auto Category $247k) due to smoother vehicle operation and stopping – relevant for those involved in passenger or cargo transit. Potential ability to address items that would result in Mechanical Failures ($338k) through engine diagnostic reporting. Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
13
Smart Mobility Overview
Data & Analysis Methodology Loss Mitigation Potential / Benefits Recommendation & Next Steps Appendix
14
Loss mitigation focus areas for XXXXXXX
Loss Type Technology-Driven Risk Mitigation Recommendation 1 For Loss Types XXX For Loss Types YYY Recommendation 2 Recommendation 3 For Loss Types ZZZ Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
15
Value proposition for XXXXXXXX
Technology-Driven Risk Management Driver and Fleet Scoring across your portfolio Collect data from multiple sources in a single repository Score each driver based on multiple data points to create a driver index Incorporate collision and or incident history from your internal sources Options include driver MVR checks Index’s can compared within an account or across accounts Provides portfolio benchmarks by industry type Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
16
The process ANALYZE & MATCH PILOT LEARN LAUNCH SCALE INCREASE SAFETY
Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
17
Increase operational efficiencies
The value Preferred pricing Reduce losses Increase operational efficiencies Increase safety Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
18
Next steps for XXXXXXXXX
1 Results Review Review results of LossDetect® full analysis 2 Secondary Analysis by Insured Augment provided data with vehicle types and existing safety options deployed, additional description for unknowns if available. Perform a second analysis at the member and vehicle type level and recommend solutions for select members based on a year by year profile (fee involved). 3 Provide Access to Munich Re Preferred Pricing for solutions Munich Re has pre-negotiated lower prices with many vendor partners based on our volume capacities. We make these discounts available to our clients. Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
19
Smart Mobility Overview
Data & Analysis Methodology Loss Mitigation Potential / Benefits Recommendation & Next Steps Appendix
20
Commercial auto market – telematics usage
13 million commercial vehicles in use Only 30% have devices installed Source: Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
21
Current impact – ADAS efficacy from various sources
Testing Method Assessment Test Parameter Assessment ADAS Technology Collision Type Source Reduction Estimate Estimate Method Weather Geography Speed Sample Size OEM Diversity Publication Date Forward Collision Warning Rear IIHS 27% DOT 23% All NCBI 67% AAA 10% Automatic Emergency Braking 50% 43% 40% 17% EU NCAP 38% Adaptive Cruise Control Academic Estimate Method: Collision Data Simulation Survey/Other Other: Inclusive/Favorable Limited/Unfavorable Note(s): Missing assessment indicates no information was provided. Assumes collision data assessment of random sample incorporates weather, geography and OEMs, select sources/studies shown for AEB. Source KPMG LLP 2018 Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
22
Current impact – ADAS efficacy from various sources
Testing Method Assessment Test Parameter Assessment ADAS Technology Collision Type Source Reduction Estimate Estimate Method Weather Geography Speed Sample Size OEM Diversity Publication Date Rear Camera Rear IIHS 17% AAA 30% Lane Detection Warning System All 11% NCBI 23% EUROPA 33% 3% Blind Spot Detection Side 14% Cross Traffic Alert 13% Consumer Reports 31% SAE 39% 2% Estimate Method: Collision Data Simulation Survey/Other Other: Inclusive/Favorable Limited/Unfavorable Note(s): Missing assessment indicates no information was provided. Assumes collision data assessment of random sample incorporates weather, geography and OEMs. Source KPMG LLP 2018 Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
23
Independent research The Insurance Research Council
56% of 1,135 drivers surveyed said they have made changes in how they drive since installing a telematics device¹ Assuming a 100% effectiveness rate for each of the following 3 technologies, (Blind Spot Monitoring, Lane Departure Warning, Forward Crash Warning) study indicated that 1.3 million crashes, 133,000 injury crashes and 10,100 fatal crashes could have been avoided² Same study indicated that FCW alone could prevent or reduce the severity of close to 800,000 crashes of 14% of all crashes² National Safety Council For the first time in nearly a decade, preliminary 2016 data from the National Safety Council estimates that as many as 40,000 people died in motor vehicle crashes last year. That marks a 6% increase over 2015, and a 14% increase over 2014 – the most dramatic two-year escalation since 1964–53 years. Virginia Tech Transportation Institute 93% of the accidents investigated in the study were due to human error, with driver inattention being the primary cause Nearly 80% of crashes and 65% of near-crashes involved some form of driver inattention within three seconds before the event 40% of rear-end collisions have no brake application whatsoever 60% of road accident fatalities are due to unintentional lane departure 1 Telematics Changing Drivers' Behavior: Insurance Research, Insurance Journal 11/18/2015, 2 Cost and Benefit Estimates of Partially-Automated Vehicle collision Avoidance Technology, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Volume 95, Part A, October 2016, pages , Corey D Harper, Chris T. Hendrickson, Constantine Samaras Smart Mobility 30 July 2019
24
Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images
Disclaimer This material was prepared based on XXXXXX data for informational use only, and is not permitted to be further distributed without the express written permission of Munich Reinsurance America, Incorporated. No representation or warranty of any kind, whether express or implied, is provided with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or applicability of this material to any recipient’s circumstances. This material is not intended to be legal, underwriting, financial or any other type of professional advice. Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. and its affiliates disclaim any and all liability whatsoever resulting from use of or reliance upon this material.
25
Learn more at munichreus.ly/smartmobility
Image: Emanuel M Schwermer / Getty Images Learn more at munichreus.ly/smartmobility Bruce Weisgerber Smart Mobility Leader Phone: © Copyright 2019 Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. All rights reserved. Product and services provided by Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. (Munich Re) and its affiliates. This material is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be legal, underwriting, financial or any other type of professional advice, and the recipient should consult with its own counsel or other advisors to verify the accuracy and completeness of any information used and to determine its applicability to the recipient’s particular circumstances.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.