Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
School of Public & Environmental Affairs
The Potential for an Intersection of REDD, Carbon Markets, and Community Forest Management in a Post-Kyoto International Climate Change Regime Erica Bramlet School of Public & Environmental Affairs
2
Outline Why is this problem worth solving? REDD+ in its current form
How carbon markets play into this Community forest management principles How it should all be combined & why this is the best method
4
Source: Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, 2006
5
Ecosystem Benefits Biodiversity Culture Maintains Watersheds
Prevents global warming Prevents flooding & erosion
6
What is being done about it
UNFCCC Parties 1992: Earth Summit, all voluntary 1997: Kyoto Protocol, binding global targets Annex 1 countries vs. non-Annex 1 countries How to account for forestry emissions? UN-REDD+ Offsets to preserve, not re-plant Other agencies (REDDiness)
7
Potential REDD+ funding mechanism Accounts for negative externalities
The Market’s Role Potential REDD+ funding mechanism Accounts for negative externalities
8
Common Pool Resource Management
Clearly Defined Boundaries Agreement between provision rules and local conditions Collective-choice arrangements Monitoring Graduated Sanctions Conflict resolution mechanisms Right to organize recognized by government
9
Putting It All Together
REDD+ Community Forest Management Carbon Markets
10
Weighing Benefits & Risks
National Approach Local Management/ National Accounting Approach High program failure costs Self-Monitoring Minimal leakage Direct incentives for sustainable management leading to local economic development High monitoring costs Corruption Forest bureaucracy may already be set up Weighing Benefits & Risks
11
Conclusion Trees act as Earth’s natural thermostat, along with many other benefits The Kyoto Protocol did not address deforestation, but the establishment of UN-REDD+ means it will probably be in the next global climate change agreement Proposed changes to make REDD+ work: Local stakeholders MUST be involved in management Utilize a carbon market to make the program financially independent from NGOs and responsive to market signals National governments should become more accountable for protecting property rights
12
Questions & Acknowledgements
“We abuse land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us. When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.” -Aldo Leopold
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.