1. WG A Ecological Status Intercalibration: Where do we go from here ?
SCG meeting 22 March 2012

2. Intercalibration : Different situations
IC completed – all countries, Annex 1
IC completed – not all countries, Annex 1
IC not completed
IC completed, Annex 2
SCG meeting 22 March 2013

3. Different situations in GIGs
Intercalibration :
Different situations in GIGs
IC completed – all countries, Annex 1
IC completed – not all countries, Annex 1
IC not completed
IC completed, Annex 2
SCG meeting 22 March 2013

4. Situation 1 – What to do ? IC completed – all countries, Annex 1
E.g., Lake Alpine, Central-Baltic, Northern Macrophytes
To translate the IC results to the national classification systems
“Guidelines to translate the intercalibration results into the national classification systems and to derive reference conditions”
SCG meeting 22 March 2013

5. Situation 2 – What to do ? IC completed – not all countries, Annex 1
E.g., Lake Alpine Phytoplankton – FR missing
MS responsibility to intercalibrate the method according to the IC results
How – will be discussed at April ECOSTAT
The main role – MS which wants to intercalibrate
SCG meeting 22 March 2013

6. Situation 3 – What to do ? IC not completed
E.g., Lake Central Baltic Fish - no results
MS responsibility to reactivate the GIG work
To submit the methods and carry out the IC
Results by 2016
SCG meeting 22 March 2013

7. Situation 4 – What to do ? IC completed, Annex 2 IC partially achieved
E.g., Baltic Sea Phytoplankton GIG: BC1 and BC9
IC partially achieved
MS responsibility to reactivate the GIG work
To complete all the necessary steps
Results by 2016
SCG meeting 22 March 2013