1. Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 477-485 (June 2018)
Comparison of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an intensive community supported discharge service versus treatment as usual for adolescents with psychiatric emergencies: a randomised controlled trial 
Dennis Ougrin, PhD, Richard Corrigall, MBBS, Jason Poole, BSc, Toby Zundel, MBBS, Mandy Sarhane, RMN, Victoria Slater, RMN, Daniel Stahl, PhD, Prof Paula Reavey, PhD, Prof Sarah Byford, PhD, Margaret Heslin, PhD, John Ivens, PhD, Maarten Crommelin, MA, Zahra Abdulla, MSc, Daniel Hayes, MBBS, Kerry Middleton, MSc, Benita Nnadi, MSc, Prof Eric Taylor, PhD 
The Lancet Psychiatry 
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
DOI: /S (18)
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
Trial profile
SDS=supported discharge service. *45 exclusions because 37 admitted twice and four admitted three times.
The Lancet Psychiatry 2018 5, DOI: ( /S (18) )
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve from a health and social care perspective for supported discharge service versus treatment as usual at 6 months based on adjusted analyses of QALYs
QALY=quality-adjusted life-years.
The Lancet Psychiatry 2018 5, DOI: ( /S (18) )
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve from a health and social care perspective for supported discharge service versus treatment as usual at 6 months based on adjusted analyses of CGAS scores
CGAS=Clinical Global Assessment Scale.
The Lancet Psychiatry 2018 5, DOI: ( /S (18) )
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Terms and Conditions