Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Bland and Altman plot for comparison of the difference between the score based on the kinematic variables recorded from the photogrammetric system outputs.

Published byMariah Chapman Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Bland and Altman plot for comparison of the difference between the score based on the kinematic variables recorded from the photogrammetric system outputs."— Presentation transcript:

1 Bland and Altman plot for comparison of the difference between the score based on the kinematic variables recorded from the photogrammetric system outputs and the real-time assessor-awarded score and against the mean of both scores. Bland and Altman plot for comparison of the difference between the score based on the kinematic variables recorded from the photogrammetric system outputs and the real-time assessor-awarded score and against the mean of both scores. Fraser Philp et al. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2018;4:e000357 ©2018 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

Download ppt "Bland and Altman plot for comparison of the difference between the score based on the kinematic variables recorded from the photogrammetric system outputs."

Similar presentations

Bland-Altman plot of 129Xe RBC:TP at baseline.

Bland-Altman plot of 129Xe RBC:TP at baseline.
The differences in sedentary behaviour and physical activity levels between the CVD groups*. The differences in sedentary behaviour and physical activity.

The differences in sedentary behaviour and physical activity levels between the CVD groups*. The differences in sedentary behaviour and physical activity.
Changes in physical fitness between baseline, 3-month and 12-month follow-up: (A) Mobility limitations in neck-shoulder area; % with severe limitations,

Changes in physical fitness between baseline, 3-month and 12-month follow-up: (A) Mobility limitations in neck-shoulder area; % with severe limitations,
Bland-Altman plot comparing average steps/day over a 7-day period for the Fitbit tracker and ActiGraph accelerometer. Bland-Altman plot comparing average.

Bland-Altman plot comparing average steps/day over a 7-day period for the Fitbit tracker and ActiGraph accelerometer. Bland-Altman plot comparing average.
Bland-Altman plots comparing step counts over a 2 min walk test for the Fitbit tracker, ActiGraph accelerometer and visual count by a physiotherapist.

Bland-Altman plots comparing step counts over a 2 min walk test for the Fitbit tracker, ActiGraph accelerometer and visual count by a physiotherapist.
Percentage change in oedema levels between pre-exercise, immediately postexercise and 48 hours postexercise grouped by condition (SS, static stretching;

Percentage change in oedema levels between pre-exercise, immediately postexercise and 48 hours postexercise grouped by condition (SS, static stretching;
Effect of confidence interval reduction to demonstrate a true difference in means. Effect of confidence interval reduction to demonstrate a true difference.

Effect of confidence interval reduction to demonstrate a true difference in means. Effect of confidence interval reduction to demonstrate a true difference.
Distribution of percentage compliance during the intervention period for Sch-I and Sch-V. Distribution of percentage compliance during the intervention.

Distribution of percentage compliance during the intervention period for Sch-I and Sch-V. Distribution of percentage compliance during the intervention.
PRISMA flow chart illustrating study inclusions through the stages of the systematic review. PRISMA flow chart illustrating study inclusions through the.

PRISMA flow chart illustrating study inclusions through the stages of the systematic review. PRISMA flow chart illustrating study inclusions through the.
Harvest plot of intervention effects on muscle physical activity levels. Harvest plot of intervention effects on muscle physical activity levels. Each.

Harvest plot of intervention effects on muscle physical activity levels. Harvest plot of intervention effects on muscle physical activity levels. Each.
Interpretation of results presented as heat maps and heat map results for the exercise subtests, ranked by the total Functional Movement Screen (FMS) score.

Interpretation of results presented as heat maps and heat map results for the exercise subtests, ranked by the total Functional Movement Screen (FMS) score.
ROC plots of the association of this score, the Rockall Score and the Blatchford Score with RET (a), death (b), and the combined Blatchford outcome (c)

ROC plots of the association of this score, the Rockall Score and the Blatchford Score with RET (a), death (b), and the combined Blatchford outcome (c)
Each circle represents the outcome of one patient, but sometimes the circles are very close or even merge. Each circle represents the outcome of one patient,

Each circle represents the outcome of one patient, but sometimes the circles are very close or even merge. Each circle represents the outcome of one patient,
Kaplan-Meier survival curve for unloader brace—Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated rapid conversion to TKR for the first 12 months, which then.

Kaplan-Meier survival curve for unloader brace—Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated rapid conversion to TKR for the first 12 months, which then.
Growth factor release from LP-PRP system preparations.

Growth factor release from LP-PRP system preparations.
(A)  Scatter plot representing the difference between YPAQ-derived MVPA and accelerometer-derived MVPA plotted against the criterion method (accelerometer);

(A)  Scatter plot representing the difference between YPAQ-derived MVPA and accelerometer-derived MVPA plotted against the criterion method (accelerometer);
Predicted %TBW by orthopaedic surgeons and rehabilitation professionals, and actual values demonstrated by the ‘educated patient’ for PWB. PWB, partial.

Predicted %TBW by orthopaedic surgeons and rehabilitation professionals, and actual values demonstrated by the ‘educated patient’ for PWB. PWB, partial.
Energy expenditure and heart rate for 16 participants while (1) sitting in a standard office chair, (2) sitting in a standard chair using the FootFidget.

Energy expenditure and heart rate for 16 participants while (1) sitting in a standard office chair, (2) sitting in a standard chair using the FootFidget.
Risk of having any adverse effects with supplements compared with placebo. Risk of having any adverse effects with supplements compared with placebo. Stratified.

Risk of having any adverse effects with supplements compared with placebo. Risk of having any adverse effects with supplements compared with placebo. Stratified.
Harvest plot of intervention effects on fitness and exercise capacity.

Harvest plot of intervention effects on fitness and exercise capacity.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google