Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAnikó Illésné Modified over 5 years ago
1
Intensive Versus Non-Intensive Induction Therapy for Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Using Two Different Novel Prognostic Models by Mohamed L. Sorror, Barry E. Storer, Mahmoud Elsawy, Amir T. Fathi, Andrew M. Brunner, Aaron T. Gerds, Mikkael A. Sekeres, Sudipto Mukherjee, Bruno C. Medeiros, Eunice S. Wang, Pankit Vachhani, Paul J Shami, Esteban Peña, Shylo Wardyn, Jenny Whitten, Rachelle Moore, Pamela S. Becker, Jeannine McCune, Stephanie J. Lee, Brenda M. Sandmaier, Frederick R. Appelbaum, and Elihu H. Estey Blood Volume 128(22): December 2, 2016 ©2016 by American Society of Hematology
2
Regimen intensity per pt age groups.
Mohamed L. Sorror et al. Blood 2016;128:216 ©2016 by American Society of Hematology
3
Comparisons of hazard ratios (HR) and 2-year rates of survival between intensive and non-intensive initial therapies. Comparisons of hazard ratios (HR) and 2-year rates of survival between intensive and non-intensive initial therapies Mohamed L. Sorror et al. Blood 2016;128:216 ©2016 by American Society of Hematology
4
Intensive versus non-intensive therapies among pts aged 70-79 years with AML.
Mohamed L. Sorror et al. Blood 2016;128:216 ©2016 by American Society of Hematology
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.