Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySukarno Darmali Modified over 5 years ago
1
JLEIC High-Energy Ion IR Design: Options and Performance
Vasiliy Morozov JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting January 10, 2019
2
100 GeV/c Ion IR Optics Pole-tip fields are limited to 6 T
FFB Far-forward detection Geometric match and dispersion suppression ions π π₯/π¦ =21.7/4.3 πm π π₯ β² / π¦ β² =0.22 mrad π½ π₯/π¦ =10/2 cm IP Secondary focus iBDS2 iBDS3 iBDS1 Ξ π₯ ππ = π· π₯ Ξ(π΅π)/(π΅π) π π₯ β² / π¦ β² =16/50 πrad π π₯/π¦ =292/19 πm π½ π₯/π¦ =69/37 cm π· π₯ =β0.95 m January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
3
Modifying IR Design for 200 GeV/c
Constraints Maximum pole-tip fields at 200 GeV/c of 6 T ο 4.6 T Minimum impact on the forward hadron tagging performance compared to the 100 GeV/c design Minimum impact on the luminosity performance compared to the 100 GeV/c design Minimum impact on the beam dynamics compared to the 100 GeV/c design Options explored Reduced FF Quad Apertures Doubled Detector Space and Halved Crossing Angle Doubled Quad Lengths 1.5x Quad Lengths and 2/3 Crossing Angle οΌ January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
4
Doubled Quad Lengths: pCDR Appendix Version (IR v1)
Keep maximum π½-functions at ~2500 m ο same maximum beam size Quad apertures οΊ 6 T / π π΅ π¦ ππ₯ at 200 GeV/c = 85 / 152 / 196 mm (radius) πβ‘ Quad aperture / distance from IP to quadβs far end = 9.1 / 10.0 / 10.5 mrad π½ π₯,π¦ β = 18 / 2.15 cm ο πΏ πΏ 0 =0.72, π· π₯ at roman pot = 0.97 m January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
5
Performance Optimization at Lower Energies (IR v1)
Cut first FFQ in half and use the halves as the first and second FFQs at lower energies Can run in this mode up to 65 GeV/c proton momentum π½ π₯,π¦ β = 7.5 / 2 cm ο luminosity improvement by a factor of πΏ πΏ 0 = 1.15 (up to π π = 65 GeV/c) January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
6
200 GeV/c IR Design with 4.6 T Pole-Tip Fields (IR v2)
π½ π₯,π¦ β πππ = cm ο π½ π₯,π¦ β πππ€ = π π.π cm π½ π₯,π¦ πππ₯ πππ =2.5 km ο π½ π₯,π¦ πππ₯ πππ€ = π½ π₯,π¦ β πππ π½ π₯,π¦ πππ₯ πππ π½ π₯,π¦ β πππ€ =π.π km Constraints π½ π₯,π¦ πππ₯ β€4200 m ο π½ π₯,π¦ β =19/1.6 cm ο πΏ πΏ 0 =0.48 Secondary focus in both planes Quadrupole aperture: πβ₯10 mrad Quadrupole length ratios: 1:2:1 Quadrupole length adjustment: π΅ ππππβπ‘ππ β€4.6 T π΅ ππππππ β€4.6 T Serious problem: forward detection region extends beyond figure-8 crossing point Figure-8 crossing point Quad L (m) π© πβπ (T) π π© π /ππ (T/m) πΉ (cm) π½ (mrad) iQDS1a/b 2.11 4.6 β33.5 13.7 11.7 iQDS2 8.44 17.1 26.9 12.7 iQDS3 4.22 β16.3 28.2 10.7 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
7
200 GeV/c Downstream IR Design with 4.6 T Pole-Tip Fields (IR v3)
Quadrupole doublet instead of a triplet Constraints π½ π₯,π¦ πππ₯ β€4200 m ο π½ π₯,π¦ β =19.6/1.6 cm ο πΏ πΏ 0 =0.48 Secondary focus in both planes Quadrupole aperture: πβ₯10 mrad Equal quadrupole lengths Quadrupole length adjustment: π΅ ππππβπ‘ππ β€4.6 T π΅ ππππππ2 β€4.6 T, π΅ ππππππ3 β€6 T Quad L (m) π© πβπ (T) π π© π /ππ (T/m) πΉ (cm) π½ (mrad) iQDS1a/b 2.23 4.6 β37.5 12.3 10.3 iQDS2 4.45 26.4 17.5 10.0 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
8
200 GeV/c Upstream IR Design with 4.6 T Pole-Tip Fields (IR v3)
Doublet instead of a triplet Constraints π½ π₯,π¦ β =19.6/1.6 cm Quadrupole aperture: 4 cm radius Quadrupole length adjustment: π΅ ππππβπ‘ππ β€4.6 T Quad L (m) π© πβπ (T) π π© π /ππ (T/m) πΉ (cm) iQUS1 2.86 4.6 β115 4 iQUS2 2.04 115 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
9
Complete 200 GeV/c IR Design (IR v3)
January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
10
Optimization for Operation at up to 100 GeV (IR v4)
π½ π₯ πππ₯ is limited by the DA, π½ π¦ πππ₯ is limited by HG effect Constraints π½ π₯,π¦ πππ₯ β€4200 m ο π½ π₯,π¦ β =8.0/1.3 cm ο π³ π³ π =π.ππ up to 100 GeV Secondary focus in both planes Quadrupole aperture: πβ₯10 mrad Varied lengths of the first two quads Quadrupole length adjustment: π΅ ππππβπ‘ππ β€4.6 T at 100 GeV/c π΅ ππππππ2 β€4.6 T, π΅ ππππππ3 β€6 T at 200 GeV/c Quad L (m) π© πβπ (T) π π© π /ππ (T/m) πΉ (cm) π½ (mrad) iQDS1a 2.21 4.6 β49.7 9.3 10.1 iQDS1b 2.27 38.4 12.0 10.0 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
11
Optimization for Operation at up to 100 GeV (IR v5)
Adjusting quad length/aperture does not help to increase πΏ, reached thin-lens limit, must adjust π½ β Approximation used to obtain π½ π₯ πππ₯ = π½ π¦ πππ₯ of 4.2 km is not very accurate because triplet is not a thin lens. Constraints π³ π³ π =π.π up to 100 GeV ο π· π πππ = π· π πππ β€ππππ m ο π½ π₯,π¦ β =6.6/1.1 cm (ratio is fixed for a doublet) Secondary focus in both planes π΅ ππππβπ‘ππ β€4.6 T at 100 GeV/c π΅ ππππππ2 β€4.6 T, π΅ ππππππ3 β€6 T at 200 GeV/c Quad L (m) π© πβπ (T) π π© π /ππ (T/m) πΉ (cm) π½ (mrad) iQDS1a 2.21 4.6 β49.7 9.3 10.1 iQDS1b 2.27 38.4 12.0 10.0 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
12
200 GeV/c IR Design with 4.6 T Pole-Tip Fields (IR v6)
Constraints π· π,π πππ β€π.π km ο π½ π₯,π¦ β =15.2/1.5 cm ο π³ π³ π =π.ππ Secondary focus in both planes Quadrupole aperture: π½β₯π mrad Equal quadrupole lengths Quadrupole length adjustment: π΅ ππππβπ‘ππ β€4.6 T π΅ ππππππ2 β€4.6 T, π΅ ππππππ3 β€6 T Quad L (m) π© πβπ (T) π π© π /ππ (T/m) πΉ (cm) π½ (mrad) iQDS1a/b 1.74 4.6 β51.4 9.0 8.2 iQDS2 3.49 37.1 12.4 8.0 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
13
200 GeV/c IR Design with 4.6 T Pole-Tip Fields (IR v7)
Constraints π· π,π πππ β€π km ο π½ π₯,π¦ β =12.8/1.2 cm ο π³ π³ π =π.ππ Secondary focus in both planes Quadrupole aperture: π½β₯π mrad Equal quadrupole lengths Quadrupole length adjustment: π΅ ππππβπ‘ππ β€4.6 T π΅ ππππππ2 β€4.6 T, π΅ ππππππ3 β€6 T Quad L (m) π© πβπ (T) π π© π /ππ (T/m) πΉ (cm) π½ (mrad) iQDS1a/b 1.74 4.6 β51.4 9.0 8.2 iQDS2 3.49 37.1 12.4 8.0 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
14
200 GeV/c IR Design with 4.6 T Pole-Tip Fields (IR v8)
To take advantage of the smaller π¦ emittance must flip polarities of the quads in the doublet, otherwise run into HG problem. Crab voltage π ππππ β 1 π½ π₯ ππππ π½ π₯ β Constraints π· π πππ β€π km, π· π πππ β€ππ km, ο π½ π₯,π¦ β =1.3/8.2 cm ο π³ π³ π =π.ππ Secondary focus in both planes Quadrupole aperture: π½β₯ππ mrad Equal quadrupole lengths Quadrupole length adjustment: π΅ ππππβπ‘ππ β€4.6 T π΅ ππππππ2 β€4.6 T, π΅ ππππππ3 β€6 T Quad L (m) π© πβπ (T) π π© π /ππ (T/m) πΉ (cm) π½ (mrad) iQDS1a/b 2.21 4.6 37.8 12.2 10.2 iQDS2 4.43 β26.5 17.4 10.0 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
15
JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
Summary Version # of quads L (m) π© πβπ (T) π π© π /ππ (T/m) πΉ (cm) π½ (mrad) π· π,π πππ (m) π³/ π³ π 1 3 2.4/4.8/2.4 6 β /β30.7 8.5/13.8/16.9 9.1 2,500 1.15 / 0.72 (65/200 GeV) 2 4.22/8.44/4.22 4.6 β /β16.3 13.7/26.9/28.2 10.7 4,200 0.48 (200 GeV) 4.45/4.45 β37.5/26.4 12.3/17.5 10.0 4 (2.21,2.27)/4.45 β49.7/38.4 9.3/12.0 0.83 (100 GeV) 5 5,100 1.0/0.58 (100/200 GeV) 3.49/3.49 β51.4/37.1 9.0/12.4 8.0 0.57 (200 GeV) 7 5,000 0.67 (200 GeV) 8 4.43/4.43 37.8/β26.5 12.2/17.4 5,000/10,000 0.81 (200 GeV) January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.