Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Part Five: Political & Economic Change

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Part Five: Political & Economic Change"— Presentation transcript:

1 Part Five: Political & Economic Change
“A confidence problem exists on the part of the people of the region who desire democratic rule in principle, but remain suspicious of both the fashion with which democratization is presented and the purposes of the democratic world.” -- Recep Tayyip Erdogan (Prime Minister of Turkey)

2 Political and Economic Change
Occur together and often influence one another Types of Change Reform Does not advocate overthrowing basic institutions Revolution Either a major revision or overthrowing basic institutions Usually has major impact in more than one area Coup d'état Replace leadership with new leaders Use of force, often by the military Political and Economic Change: If one occurs without the other, tensions are created that have serious consequences. Ex: rapid economic changes in China have strongly pressured the govt to institute political changes. So far they have resisted those changes. Reform: Want to change some of the methods that political and economic leaders use to reach goals that society generally accepts Ex – may want to change business practices in order to preserve real competition in a capitalist country, or may want govt to become more proactive in preserving natural environment Revolution: Ex: Industrial Rev changed economies of Europe (feudalism to capitalism) but eventually changed political systems, social classes, etc Ex: Fr/Amer Rev were directed at changing political systems, but also changed economies and societal practices Coup d’etats: Literally “blows to the state” Most limited of the 3 types of change Typically occur in countries where govt institutions are weak and leaders have taken control by force New leaders are always vulnerable to being overthrown by another coup

3 Political Economy Handout
See separate handout from Mr. Heim

4

5 Attitudes Toward Change
Radicalism Rapid, dramatic changes Replace current system with something better Liberalism Gradual change instead of revolution Conservatism Less supportive of change Reactionaries Protect against change Want to turn the clock back to an earlier era Similar to radicals, would be willing to use force “When you are right you cannot be too radical; when you are wrong, you cannot be too conservative. “ Martin Luther King, Jr. Radicalism Ex: In 1917 in Russia, the old czarist regime was replaced by communist USSR Radicals are often leaders of revolution Liberalism: Not the same as liberal ideology Supports reform – don’t think political/econ systems are permanently broken, but need to be fixed/improved Conservatism Tend to see change as disruptive Don’t want to undermine legitimacy of state/regime Reactionary: Oppose revolution and reform, but also don’t want status quo Want to reinstate political, social and econ institutions that once existed (ex. KKK wants to restore institutional racism) Like radicals they are more willing to use violence than Liberals/Conservatives

6 Three Trends of Development
Democratization Move Towards Market Economies Revival of Ethnic/Cultural Politics Indicates growing commonalities among nations Represents fragmentation Review of Democracies: Democracy takes many forms One broad, essential requirement is existence of competitive elections (regular, free and fair) Gray area – Russia, Nigeria, Indonesia Liberal/Substantive Democracies: Competitive elections, civil liberties, rule of law, neutral judiciary, open civil society, civilian control of military Illiberal/Procedural Democracies: Have democratic procedures in place, but have significant restrictions Ex. Have rule of law, but not always followed by those in power Ex. Presidents have disproportionate share of power Ex. Elections lack true competitiveness *Presence of a procedural democracy (illiberal) is a necessary condition for development of a substantive democracy (liberal)

7 Review of Democratization (see handout)
The spread of representative governments to more countries and the process of making governments more representative… The transformation process from a nondemocratic regime to a illiberal/procedural democracy to a liberal/substantive democracy What must be present to qualify as a procedural democracy? What must be present to qualify as a substantive democracy? Review of Democracies: Democracy takes many forms One broad, essential requirement is existence of competitive elections (regular, free and fair) Gray area – Russia, Nigeria, Indonesia Liberal/Substantive Democracies: Competitive elections, civil liberties, rule of law, neutral judiciary, open civil society, civilian control of military Illiberal/Procedural Democracies: Have democratic procedures in place, but have significant restrictions Ex. Have rule of law, but not always followed by those in power Ex. Presidents have disproportionate share of power Ex. Elections lack true competitiveness *Presence of a procedural democracy (illiberal) is a necessary condition for development of a substantive democracy (liberal)

8 Review of Democratization
Discussion Question: TRUE or FALSE (be prepared to defend your answer): The presence of an illiberal/procedural is a necessary condition for development of a liberal/substantive democracy True! Presence of a procedural democracy (illiberal) is a necessary condition but not sufficient for development of a substantive democracy (liberal)

9

10 Three Trends of Development - #1 Democratization
Huntington’s 3 Waves of Democratization 1st wave – developed gradually over time 2nd wave – occurred after Allied victory in WWII 3rd wave – characterized by defeat of totalitarian rulers in S. Amer, Eastern Eur and parts of Africa Samuel Huntington, political scientist Huntington’s 3 Waves: 2nd wave continued until 1960s –characterized by decolonization around the globe 3rd wave began during 70’s - now

11 Three Trends of Development - #1 Democratization
Reasons for Democratization Loss of legitimacy by authoritarian regimes Expansion of middle class New emphasis on human rights “Snowball Effect” Starts with political liberalization Democratic consolidation A stable political system is supported by all parts of society Reasons for Democratization Loss of legitimacy by both right and left wing authoritarian regimes Expansion of middle class in developing countries New emphasis on human rights by U.S. and European Union Snowball Effect – when one country in a region becomes democratic, it influences others to do so Ex. Poland’s influence on other nations of eastern Europe in 1980’s, also Arab Spring Huntington believes democracy may be declared when a country has had a least two successive peaceful turnovers of power. Democratic Consolidation An authoritarian regime may transition to a democracy as a result of a “trigger event,” such as an economic crisis or military defeat Political discontent is generally fueled if the crisis is preceded by a period of relative improvement in standard of living – called “revolution of rising expectations.” Democratization begins when these conditions are accompanied by a willingness on part of ruling elite to accept power-sharing arrangements and readiness of ppl to participate in democratic process Political Liberalization Eventually leads other states to recognize it as a liberal democracy

12 Three Trends of Development - #2 Economic Liberalism and Market Economies
Ideology of liberalism from 19th century Europe Bourgeoisie – middle class professionals/businessmen More political & economic freedoms Right to own property, freedom of speech, representation, free trade Radicals (such as Karl Marx) advocated more equality Command Economy Government owned industrial enterprises & sales outlets Economy managed by central government planning 5-year plans very common Ideology of Liberalism from 19th century Europe Bourgeoisie wanted their views to be represented in government and their economic goals to be unhampered by govt interference These values clashed with radicals who emphasized equality more than liberty Command Economies: Central planning supported economic growth by in many cases, esp in Soviet Union, by 1980s most communist countries found themselves in deep economic trouble.

13 Three Trends of Development - #2 Economic Liberalism and Market Economies
Trend toward market economies based on private ownership of property and little interference from govt regulation Mixed economy – some government involvement Pure Market economy – no government involvement Economic Liberalization: Process of limiting the power of the state over private property and market forces Privatization: Transfer of state-owned property to private ownership Economic Liberalization: Less gov’t involvement in economy

14 Command vs. Mixed vs. Market Economies
More Centralization Less Centralization Right to own property is greatly restricted All industry is owned by the govt Competition and profit are prohibited Elements of command and market economies are present/mixed Right to own property is accepted/guaranteed Most industry is owned by private individuals. Competition and profit are not controlled by the govt

15 Command vs. Mixed vs. Market Economies
More Centralization Less Centralization COMMAND ECONOMY MIXED ECONOMY MARKET ECONOMY Right to own property is greatly restricted All industry is owned by the govt Competition and profit are prohibited Elements of command and market economies are present/mixed Right to own property is accepted/guaranteed Most industry is owned by private individuals. Competition and profit are not controlled by the govt

16 Three Trends of Development – #2: Economic Liberalism and Market Economies
Discussion Question: Is there a correlation between democratization and marketization?

17 Three Trends of Development – #2: Economic Liberalism and Market Economies
Discussion Question: Is there a correlation between democratization and marketization? Mexico has moved steadily toward a market economy since 1980’s and democratization has appeared to follow China has been moving toward capitalism since late 1970’s without any clear sign of democratization

18

19 Three Trends of Development #3 Revival of Ethnic or Cultural Politics
Fragmentation vs. nationalism Politicization of Religion Esp. in Middle East Tends to emphasize difference among nations Fragmentation – divisions based on ethnic or cultural identity Nationalism – identities based on nationhood – had been declining in favor of increasing globalization Politicization of Religion – 21st century Samuel Huntingon argued that our most important and dangerous future conflicts will be based on clashes of civilizations: The West Orthodox world (Russia) Islamic Countries Latin American Africa The Hindu world The Confucian world The Buddhist world Japan

20 Part Six: Public Policy
“Justice is itself the great standing policy of civil society; and any eminent departure from it, under any circumstances, lies under the suspicion of being no policy at all.” – Edmund Burke (Irish statesman)

21 Public Policy Decisions the govt makes to address issues and solve problems Inputs: Interest Articulation Interest Aggregation Machines are the political institutions: Legislature, Executive, Bureaucracy Outputs/ Outcomes: Policy Implementation Gears=Policy Making

22 Public Policy Common issues: Economic Performance Social Welfare
Civil Liberties Environment

23 Public Policy – Economic Performance
Common Measures of Economic Performance Gross Domestic Product (GDP) All the goods and services produced by a country’s economy in a given year, excluding income earned outside country GDP per Capita: GDP divided by population of country Gross National Product (GNP) GDP + income citizens earned outside the country GNP per Capita: GNP divided by population of country Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) Like GNP, except it takes into account what people can buy using their income in local economy PPP per Capita: PPP divided by population of country

24 Comparative Economic Indexes (2010)
CHINA IRAN MEXICO NIGERIA RUSSIA BRITAIN GDP (in billions) 3,206 286 1,032 165 1,290 2,772 GDP per Capita 4,400 8,900 1,400 10,600 36,200 PPP per Capita 7,600 13,900 2,500 15,900 34,800

25 Public Policy – Economic Performance
Discussion Question: Analyze the data in the previous slide. How does the measure of economic performance (index) used change the conclusions you are likely to make when comparing countries in the AP6? (Be specific)

26 Public Policy – Economic Performance
Discussion Question: Analyze the data in the previous slide. How does the measure of economic performance (index) used change the conclusions you are likely to make when comparing countries in the AP6? (Be specific) If you just use GDP, Iran appears far below China and Mexico, but if we use PPP per capita, Iranians are economically better off than the Chinese and are similar to the Mexicans China exceeds Iran and Mexico in GDP, but in GDP per capita it equals Iran and falls below Mexico. In PPP per capita, China falls below both Iran and Mexico Russia more than doubles Iran’s GDP per capita, but when adjusted for PPP per capita, Russia do not earn twice as much

27 Purchasing Power Parity

28 Public Policy – Social Welfare
Health Employment Family assistance Education Measures of Social Welfare Literacy rates Distribution of income Life expectancy Education levels

29 Public Policy – Social Welfare
Gini Index A mathematical formula that measures the amount of economic inequality in a society 0 = perfect equality, 1= complete inequality U.S. (2009) .41 UK .36 Russia .375 Iran .383 China .415 Nigeria .43 Mexico .48

30 Public Policy – Economic Performance
Discussion Question: Analyze the data in the previous slide. How does the U.S. compare in terms of inequality to the countries in the AP6? (Be specific)

31 Public Policy – Economic Performance
Discussion Question: Analyze the data in the previous slide. How does the U.S. compare in terms of inequality to the countries in the AP6? (Be specific) More inequality than: UK, Russia, Iran About the same as: China & Nigeria Less than Mexico

32

33 Public Policy – Social Welfare
Human Development Index (HDI) Measures the well-being of a country’s people by factoring in life expectancy (health), mean & expected years of school (education) and GNP per capita (living standards) Health + Education + Living Standards = HDI Index Scale Index scale is 0 – 1 (decimal score) Scores over .80 = high levels of HD Scores under .50 = low levels of HD

34 Public Policy – Social Welfare

35 Human Development Index Darker colors indicate more developed

36 Public Policy Civil Liberties: Political Rights and Freedoms
Political rights – promotion of equality Political freedoms – promotion of freedom Freedom House Rankings Ranks countries on 1 to 7 scale 1 = most free, 7 = least free Country (2013) Rating Political Rights Civil Liberties China Not Free 7 6 Iran Mexico Partially Free 3 Nigeria 4 Russia 5 UK Free 1 US

37 Public Policy - Challenges
Globalization The increasing interconnectedness and interdependence of people, cultures, economies, and nation-states facilitated by technology, trade, and cultural diffusion (more on this to come) Environment European countries – formation of “green” parties International conferences Population Immigration + migration Terrorism

38 Public Policy - Challenges
Corruption: The illegitimate use of political or economic power for personal or illegal purposes Transparency International is an NGO that evaluates & publicizes report of corruption in business/politics. Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) Ranks Countries 0 (very corrupt) – 100 (very clean) Predict: Which countries of the AP6 will have the least corruption? The most?

39 Public Policy- answering of Questions
How do governments differ as producers of goods and services? In communist societies, the government controls industries as private ownership is not permitted (China is the exception today) In free market societies, the government controls a very small number of producers of goods and services in socialist societies, the governments often own a larger number of critical producers of goods and services

40 So how do governments differ in distributive policies?
Developed countries allocate ½ or more of governmental expenditures to education, health, and welfare Developing countries spend very little on health and education (Why is this a “catch-22” for developing countries?) Spending on national security varies widely among developed and developing countries depending on internal and external threats

41 What has been a trend in distributive policies since the 20th century?
Vast increase in distributive policies, especially in Western European “welfare states” Public policies in these states emphasize achieving equity by providing services such as old age pensions, health, sickness insurance, unemployment benefits, child care, etc. Accompanied by high taxation rates

42 Why is it important to measure domestic welfare outcomes?
Examine the effectiveness of public policies Such welfare outcomes include sanitation and health, communication and information, education, and literacy Developed countries have far higher literacy rates, lower mortality rates, and fertility rates then do developing countries

43 Why is it important to measure domestic security outcomes?
Without domestic security, the conduct of personal, economic, and civil life are impossible High crime rates are often a development of rural migration into cities, inequality of incomes, unemployment, etc Strong and fair law enforcement often has a positive effect on security outcomes


Download ppt "Part Five: Political & Economic Change"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google