1. 4th Amendment
Protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures (capture of items)
A POLICE OFFICER MUST HAVE A warrant given to him by a judge and Probable cause is also needed

2. How is this case related to the 4th Amendment?
The 4th Amendment has to do with search and seizure and the case is about using a warrant to search Glen’s belongings.
This case deals with the issues of search and seizure and the 4th Amendment is concerned with the right of people to be secure and protected against unreasonable searches and seizures.

3. What do you think the court held in this case
What do you think the court held in this case? Could the police officer search the backpack?
Court held that the police had the right to search the backpack because the homeowner gave consent and had apparent authority to do so.
The backpack had nothing on it to show who owned it and was in a place open to all occupants of the house so the homeowner had the right to give consent to search.

4. 5th Amendment
YOU DO NOT HAVE TO TESTIFY AGAINST YOURSELF – THIS IS ALSO KNOWN AS PLEADING THE FIFTH
You must have due process of law (day in court) before you are convicted
The government cannot take your land unless it pROVIDES JUST COMPENSATION, ThE ACT OF GOVERNMENT TAKING LAND is known as Eminent Domain
You cannot be tried for the same crime twice—called “Double Jeopardy”

5. How is this case related to the Amendment?
The 5th Amendment protects against self-incrimination and in this case, Shawn waived his Miranda rights and confessed to the crime.

6. What do you think the court rules when Shawn tried to take back his confession?
The court held that Shawn knew what he was doing when he waived his Miranda rights