1. Durability and outcome of aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair versus double valve replacement 
Masaki Hamamoto, MD, Ko Bando, MD, Junjiro Kobayashi, MD, Toshihiko Satoh, MD, MPH, Yoshikado Sasako, MD, Kazuo Niwaya, MD, Osamu Tagusari, MD, Toshikatsu Yagihara, MD, Soichiro Kitamura, MD 
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
DOI: /S (02)

2. Fig 1
Long-term actuarial survival for the subgroups of patients with AVR + MVP and DVR. Solid line = AVR + MVP; dotted line = DVR. (AVR = aortic valve replacement; DVR = double valve replacement; MVP = mitral valve repair; Pts. = patients.)
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , 28-34DOI: ( /S (02) )

3. Fig 2
Freedom from structural valve deterioration for the subgroups of patients with AVR + MVP and DVR stratified by the type of prosthesis. (AVR = aortic valve replacement; DVR = double valve replacement; MVP = mitral valve repair; Pts. = patients.)
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , 28-34DOI: ( /S (02) )

4. Fig 3
Freedom from mitral reoperation for the subgroups of patients with AVR + MVP and DVR. (AVR = aortic valve replacement; DVR = double valve replacement; MVP = mitral valve repair; Pts. = patients.)
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , 28-34DOI: ( /S (02) )

5. Fig 4
Freedom from mitral reoperation after AVR + MVP stratified by the rheumatic etiology. Solid line = nonrheumatic; dotted line = rheumatic. (AVR = aortic valve replacement; DVR = double valve replacement; MVP= mitral valve repair; Pts. = patients.)
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , 28-34DOI: ( /S (02) )