1. INFORMATION SEMINAR Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania programme 2014-2020
3rd Call for proposals

2. Why Intervention logic is needed?
Project Intervention Logic
Why Intervention logic is needed?
To measure project’s contribution to Programme
To ensure result-oriented approach
To guide through the whole process – from idea to actual outputs
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

3. Objectives, outputs, results etc. have to be measurable
Project Intervention Logic
Therefore...
Project’s intervention logic has to mirror Programme’s intervention logic
Objectives, outputs, results etc. have to be measurable
Intervention logic applies to the whole process – from objectives to results
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

4. Project Intervention Logic
Project should
Project should
Address at least one* Programme output indicator
Address one Programme priority
Address one Programme priority
Address one Programme specific objective
Address one Programme specific objective
Address one Programme result indicator
Address one Programme result indicator
* Several Programme output indicators can be chosen in case several output indicators are developed for a particular Programme specific objective
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

5. Project Intervention Logic
Project idea
What are our common needs and potentials?
Project Objectives&Results
What do we want to change? How it will be different?
Project Outputs&Indicators
What do we need to deliver to obtain this change?
Work plan&Budget
How we will do it? What resources do we need to do this work?
! Project is created for target group/stakeholders
Target size has to be set and reported!
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

6. Corresponds to one Programme priority Relevant (need for intervention)
Project Intervention Logic – Project idea
Project idea
Joint challenge
Corresponds to one Programme priority
Innovative
Relevant (need for intervention)
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

7. Programme specific objective
Project Intervention Logic - Objectives
For 3.1. – To improve accessibility and efficiency of social services
For To improve living conditions in deprived communities and territories
Programme specific objective
Overall objective
Relates to strategic aspects of the project, gives overall context on what is planned to be achieved
Specific objective (up to 3)
A concrete statement (measurable) giving description on what is planned to be achieved and for that requires a development and usage of project outputs
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

8. S M A R T Specific Clear, concise, detailed Measurable
Project Intervention Logic - Objectives S
Specific
Clear, concise, detailed M
Measurable
Quality and quantity A R T
Achievable
Relevant
Sufficient contribution
Time-related
Realistic
Specific time frame
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

9. Project Intervention Logic - Results
For 3.1. –Number of people benefiting from more accessible, efficient social inclusion measures and social services
For Number of households not facing pollution, grime and other municipal environmental problems
Programme result indicator
Quantification is not a mandatory requirement
Project result
The immediate advantage of carrying out the project, telling us about the benefit of using the project main outputs. It should indicate the change the project is aiming for.
Often materialise only after the end of the project
Direct link between programme and project should be demonstrated
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

10. Project Intervention Logic – main output
For 3.1. – 1) Created/improved social services and infrastructure
2) Created/improved social inclusion measures
For Number of institutions, participating in cooperation
Programme output indicator/Project main output
Linked to project objectives
Project main output
The product of the activities (tool) funded telling us what has actually been produced for the money given to the project. It contributes directly to the achievement of the project result.
Is an outcome from implemented project activities, should be measurable
! NOTE: Only 1 main output directly contributing to programme can be created. No main outputs with «0»!
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

11. Social inclusion as a precondition of territorial development
Specific objective 3.1.
Requirements for project main outputs
Programme output indicator: 3.1.
Created/improved social services and infrastructure
Created/improved social inclusion measures
Project shall specify one project main output contributing to one Programme output indicator and having the same measurement unit. It is possible to contribute to both indicators – 2 main outputs have to be created and each has to correspond to a particular Programme output indicator.
Project main output: cannot be with value 0
How to calculate value:
Created/improved social services and infrastructure – number of created/improved social services (identifying them) which will be implemented also after the end of the project; and number of created infrastructure objects
Created/improved social inclusion measures – number of created/improved social services (identifying them) which will be implemented also after the end of the project.
How to justify in report:
Reporting in reports information about created/improved social services, inclusion measures and on created investment objects and attaching respective proves
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

12. Social inclusion as a precondition of territorial development
Specific objective 3.2.
Requirements for project main outputs
Programme output indicator: 3.2. Number of deprived communities participating in the regeneration activities
Project shall specify one project main output contributing to Programme output indicator and having the same measurement unit
Project main output: cannot be with value 0 and cannot be a deliverable
How to calculate value:
Deprived communities or deprived territories have to be calculated.
Deprived community - group of people with a common characteristic or interest living together within a larger society (for example, unemployed, at-risk children and youth etc.). One type of group per project partner can be reported.
Deprived territory – whole project partners’ territory is deprived (is not so advantageous comparing with other close territories and proven with statistical data).
Justification that group/territory is deprived, has to be presented.
How to justify in report:
Report on activities which were planned in project for a particular deprived community/territory, providing respective proves.
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

13. Programme output indicator/Project main output
Project Intervention Logic – work plan
For 3.1. – 1) Created/improved social services and infrastructure
2) Created/improved social inclusion measures
For Number of institutions, participating in cooperation
Programme output indicator/Project main output
Project work plan
The project workplan shall explain what needs to be done to deliver project main outputs and achieve project specific objectives. Work plan is divided in several work packages
Activities: specific tasks performed for resources which are used.
Deliverables: Result of an activity, physical evidence which has been produced through an activity
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

14. Project Intervention Logic – indicators What? Why? To answer
Deliverable
Monitoring progress
Are you doing what you planned?
Output
Monitoring and evaluation
Do you deliver on specific objective?
Results
Evaluation
Do outputs deliver a real benefit?
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

15. Project Intervention Logic – Scheme (SO 3.1.)
 Programme priority
Project overall objective
To create preconditions for increase of social enterprises
Project results
 As a result of the project, it is expected that number of social enterprises will increase due to a created training and support network and it is expected that also number of persons with disabilities integrated in labour market will increase.
PROGRAMME
Programme specific objective
To improve accessibility and efficiency of social services
Programme result indicator
Number of people benefiting from more accessible, efficient social inclusion measures and social services
Descriptions of actions supported
Programme output indicator
Created/improved social inclusion measures
Project main outputs
Created 1 social inclusion measure – support for potential social entrepreneurs
Project specific objective
By the mid-2020 to evaluate existing social entrepreneurship support system and make recommendations for improvements
By the end of 2021 to create a training and support network for potential social entrepreneurs on how to start and run social enterprise
Project work plan:
work packages, activities, deliverables, time plan
PROJECT
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

16. Shortcoming/definitions, durability Shortcoming/workplan
Lessons learned the 1st Call and 2nd Call
Shortcoming/Idea
No proof or facts provided on project context - common territorial challenge, reason for cross-border cooperation, what innovation/ new knowledge is brought
Recommendation
Provide proof (statistical data, links to sources), show demand (studies, research, survey), how target group will contribute, explain and demonstrate need for cooperation and innovative/ new solutions applied
Shortcoming/definitions, durability
Too broad and vague definitions (objectives, results, outputs) or «copy, paste» from Programme indicators, lack of sufficient information on project durability
Recommendation
Tailor-made objectives, results, main outputs – but the same measurement unit as in Programme indicators has to be chosen. Clear information on durability of project activities/main outputs should be provided
Shortcoming/workplan
Not all activities directly contribute to achievement of main outputs; vague description of activities, not measurable deliverables, no clear demonstration of cross-border relevance of investments, too many WP
Recommendation
Be clear, precise, include measurement indicators, double-check logic of workplan, including timeline; create 1-2 WP Implementation and Investment; demonstrate how investments will be used by partners during and after the project
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

17. Shortcoming/partnership Shortcoming/documents
Lessons learned the 1st Call and 2nd Call
Shortcoming/partnership
Not all relevant partners are involved, project doesn’t involve direct users of project results, partnership is not balanced, responsibilities are not set.
Recommendation
Involve right partners, users of project results, identify responsible partners per activities, create balanced partnership – level of involvement in all aspects of the project
Shortcoming/budget
Too broad or too detailed descriptions, not in line with planned activities, cost-sharing
Recommendation
Be precise, but maintain right balance of details, cross-check with what is planned in workplan, cost-sharing is not allowed, each partner plans its own expenses.
Shortcoming/documents
Not all relevant documents are attached - for planned construction works, not all necessary confirmations are submitted etc.
Recommendation
Check Programme manual section 6.1. what documents and in what format need to be submitted together with application form
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme

18. Thank you for your attention
Please do not hesitate to contact us for any further information or visit