Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Pál Maurovich-Horvat et al. JIMG 2010;3:

Published byPiroska Magyar Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Pál Maurovich-Horvat et al. JIMG 2010;3:"— Presentation transcript:

1 Pál Maurovich-Horvat et al. JIMG 2010;3:440-444
Cross Sections of a Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque With Homogenous Intraplaque Attenuation With No Napkin-Ring Sign The average plaque attenuation on the nonenhanced CT (A) was 65.8 ± 9.8 HU, and was 66.7 ± 10.6 HU on contrast-enhanced CT (B). The corresponding histological section revealed a fibrous plaque with no necrotic core. Intraplaque vasa vasorum are visible in the basal portion of the plaque (C and D). NP = noncalcified plaque; other abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 3. Pál Maurovich-Horvat et al. JIMG 2010;3: American College of Cardiology Foundation

Download ppt "Pál Maurovich-Horvat et al. JIMG 2010;3:"

Similar presentations

Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Assessment of Coronary Plaque Progression in Coronary.

Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Assessment of Coronary Plaque Progression in Coronary.
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Fig. 1. (A) Non-contrast CT (calcium score scan) showing no calcification in the right coronary artery (arrow). (B) First-phase contrast-enhanced CT showing.

Fig. 1. (A) Non-contrast CT (calcium score scan) showing no calcification in the right coronary artery (arrow). (B) First-phase contrast-enhanced CT showing.
Adel H. Allam et al. JIMG 2011;4:

Adel H. Allam et al. JIMG 2011;4:
Zhi-hui Hou et al. JIMG 2012;5:

Zhi-hui Hou et al. JIMG 2012;5:
Tareq Ibrahim et al. JIMG 2009;2:

Tareq Ibrahim et al. JIMG 2009;2:
Erling Falk et al. JIMG 2009;2:

Erling Falk et al. JIMG 2009;2:
Kenichi Fujii et al. JIMG 2015;8:

Kenichi Fujii et al. JIMG 2015;8:
Johan W. Verjans et al. JIMG 2016;9:

Johan W. Verjans et al. JIMG 2016;9:
Philipp Blanke et al. JIMG 2015;8:

Philipp Blanke et al. JIMG 2015;8:
Figure 6. Representative micrographs showing macrophages and nitrotyrosine in atherosclerotic plaques in aortic root cross-sections from apo-E −/− mice.

Figure 6. Representative micrographs showing macrophages and nitrotyrosine in atherosclerotic plaques in aortic root cross-sections from apo-E −/− mice.
Gaku Nakazawa et al. JIMG 2009;2:

Gaku Nakazawa et al. JIMG 2009;2:
Adil Rajwani et al. JACEP 2015;1:

Adil Rajwani et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Masatoshi Yamazaki et al. JACEP 2015;1:

Masatoshi Yamazaki et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Tom F. Brouwer et al. JACEP 2016;2:

Tom F. Brouwer et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Example of Subendocardial Defects With Normal Transmural WT on Apical 3-Chamber View With RTMCE Apical 3-chamber view of RTMCE with power modulation (iE33,

Example of Subendocardial Defects With Normal Transmural WT on Apical 3-Chamber View With RTMCE Apical 3-chamber view of RTMCE with power modulation (iE33,
Ryoji Nagoshi et al. JCIN 2016;9:e107-e109

Ryoji Nagoshi et al. JCIN 2016;9:e107-e109
Muhammad Shahreyar et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep

Muhammad Shahreyar et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Common VW-MR imaging pitfalls.

Common VW-MR imaging pitfalls.
Mohit K. Turagam et al. JACEP 2017;3:

Mohit K. Turagam et al. JACEP 2017;3:

Similar presentations

Ads by Google