Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Fig. 6 Structural basis for the constitutive activity of US28.

Published byReynold Doyle Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Fig. 6 Structural basis for the constitutive activity of US28."— Presentation transcript:

1 Fig. 6 Structural basis for the constitutive activity of US28.
Structural basis for the constitutive activity of US28. (A) Conformations of ArgICL2 in CCR5 (green; PDB ID: 4MBS; left), the US28 crystal structure (orange; center) and the US28 MD simulations (orange; right). (B) Schematic diagram of the network of side-chain interactions surrounding the DRY motif in CCR5 (left panel) and US28 (MD simulation; right). John S. Burg et al. Science 2015;347: Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science

Download ppt "Fig. 6 Structural basis for the constitutive activity of US28."

Similar presentations

Two functional states of human CFTR

Two functional states of human CFTR
Structure-Based Reassessment of the Caveolin Signaling Model: Do Caveolae Regulate Signaling through Caveolin-Protein Interactions?  Brett M. Collins,

Structure-Based Reassessment of the Caveolin Signaling Model: Do Caveolae Regulate Signaling through Caveolin-Protein Interactions?  Brett M. Collins,
Comparison of ternary TCR-lipid-CD1 complex structures.

Comparison of ternary TCR-lipid-CD1 complex structures.
Oligopeptides bound with HLA-A2 or with HLA-A2 and C25 TCR

Oligopeptides bound with HLA-A2 or with HLA-A2 and C25 TCR
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)

Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
HLA-F: A New Kid Licensed for Peptide Presentation

HLA-F: A New Kid Licensed for Peptide Presentation
Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.

“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Fig. 1 A single amino acid difference in the ATP-binding domain of GSK3α and GSK3β results in structural and topological differences. A single amino acid.

Fig. 1 A single amino acid difference in the ATP-binding domain of GSK3α and GSK3β results in structural and topological differences. A single amino acid.
Biohybrid structural color hydrogel films with autonomic iridescence displaying. Biohybrid structural color hydrogel films with autonomic iridescence displaying.

Biohybrid structural color hydrogel films with autonomic iridescence displaying. Biohybrid structural color hydrogel films with autonomic iridescence displaying.
Crystal structure of STAT6CF-N3 complex and its comparison with STAT6CF-N4 complex structure. Crystal structure of STAT6CF-N3 complex and its comparison.

Crystal structure of STAT6CF-N3 complex and its comparison with STAT6CF-N4 complex structure. Crystal structure of STAT6CF-N3 complex and its comparison.
Comparison of ternary TCR-lipid-CD1 complex structures.

Comparison of ternary TCR-lipid-CD1 complex structures.
Fig. 4 Ballistic simulation of BP FETs.

Fig. 4 Ballistic simulation of BP FETs.
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flow diagram of VRC trial

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flow diagram of VRC trial
Fig. 3 EPR and ENDOR spectra of isotope-labeled intermediates and crystal structures of SAM-bound CmnDph2. EPR and ENDOR spectra of isotope-labeled intermediates.

Fig. 3 EPR and ENDOR spectra of isotope-labeled intermediates and crystal structures of SAM-bound CmnDph2. EPR and ENDOR spectra of isotope-labeled intermediates.
Fig. 2 CL-DMD modeling of FKBP.

Fig. 2 CL-DMD modeling of FKBP.
Fig. 2 CFD results. CFD results. Results of CFD simulations in horizontal (left column) and vertical (right column) cross-sections. All models oriented.

Fig. 2 CFD results. CFD results. Results of CFD simulations in horizontal (left column) and vertical (right column) cross-sections. All models oriented.
Fig. 1. Schematic showing the shedding of tumor DNA from head and neck cancers into the saliva or plasma. Schematic showing the shedding of tumor DNA from.

Fig. 1. Schematic showing the shedding of tumor DNA from head and neck cancers into the saliva or plasma. Schematic showing the shedding of tumor DNA from.
Fig. 3. Comparison of prediction performance.

Fig. 3. Comparison of prediction performance.
MD simulation of SUMO-1-Alt:S2B3 identifies residues critical for isoform specificity. MD simulation of SUMO-1-Alt:S2B3 identifies residues critical for.

MD simulation of SUMO-1-Alt:S2B3 identifies residues critical for isoform specificity. MD simulation of SUMO-1-Alt:S2B3 identifies residues critical for.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google