Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

System Simulation for Aftertreatment University Perspective

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "System Simulation for Aftertreatment University Perspective"— Presentation transcript:

1 System Simulation for Aftertreatment University Perspective
Christopher J. Rutland Engine Research Center University of Wisconsin - Madison UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

2 Aftertreatment System Modeling
Study device-to-device interactions Study transients: load, speed Use integrated system model GT-Power Engine and Exhaust Model PM and NOx Models Tail Pipe Emissions DOC DPF LNT SCR Engine Feedback and Controls SCR - DPF Matlab Simulink UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

3 System Integration Development
Collect device models Develop some in house Obtain others from partners (primarily GM) Use appropriate level of model fidelity Individually tested and calibrated Emphasis on integrating models Device interaction Transient simulation Simple controls for operating system UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

4 Funding University Research
Government Supports longer term, more basic research National priorities to support research communities Does not expect immediate payoff High risk research is OK May solicit industry input (e.g. DOE) Good match for university objectives and time scales Industry Provides real world problems: Relevance Different priorities than universities UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

5 University Industry Train students Focus on basics
Long term funding Pursue interesting phenomenon Explore to understand Creativity comes from exploration Make a profit Emphasis on near term Short term Must solve problems Once solved, move on Explore to solve problems Creativity comes from need UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

6 Industry – University: Cautions
Students need long term commitment Mission critical projects may not match university capabilities IP ownership and proprietary information can be problematic Increases closer to production UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

7 GM – UW ERC Cooperative Research Lab
Success story Continuous existence for over 10 years Project topics are developed in close collaboration Active participation of GM researchers in ERC projects GM commitment to students and program UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

8 Education Primary goal of universities Training process
Partially trained people working on projects Experience levels are low May not always find the most appropriate student for a project Commitment to helping students achieve their educational goals UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

9 Examples Using system simulations to explore aftertreatment issues
1. DPF loading vs. regeneration frequency Impact on fuel economy 2. Using DPF thermal inertia Both projects supported by UW-GM CRL UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

10 DPF Regeneration Study
Exhaust Temperatures for 537 C DPF Regeneration Exhaust Temperatures for 566 C DPF Regeneration UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

11 Impact of Regeneration Temperature
Mass of PM in DPF for 537 C DPF Regeneration Mass of PM for 566 C DPF Regeneration UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

12 Pressure Drop Pressure Drop 537 C DPF Regeneration
Reduction in PM loading of DPF Exhaust gas cools Increase volumetric flow rate + DPF inlet temp UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

13 Impact on Fuel Economy Brake Specific Fuel Consumption 537 C DPF Regeneration Brake Specific Fuel Consumption 566 C DPF Regeneration Engine + DOC fuel injection Engine + DOC fuel injection Engine only Engine only UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

14 DPF Regeneration Strategy Study
Mass of PM Trapped in the DPF 566 C DPF Regeneration UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

15 Regeneration Impact on Fuel Economy
10-loading 6 loading 4 loading 2 loading 1 loading 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 1 % Fuel penalty due to back pressure 6 Maximum amount of loading in DPF, g/l % Regeneration fuel penalty Trade off point Regeneration fuel penalty Regeneration Fuel Penalty Trade off Point Engine Fuel Penalty Back pressure fuel penalty UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

16 Oxidation Rate and Thermal Inertia
800 1600 10 20 30 40 Time [s] Soot oxidation rate [mg/s] Mass of soot [g]/ 0.5 1 1.5 2 x 10 -4 Exhaust fuel rate [kg/s] Trapped soot Soot oxidation rate Minimum soot target Fuel rate Thermal inertia Soot continues to be consumed after fuel injection stops Opportunities for optimization Oxidation rate decreases Constant temperature Decreasing amount of soot UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010

17 Summary University system simulation
Training students Should focus on basics Can greatly benefit from industry ties when done correctly Integrated system useful for studying device interactions and transients UW ERC – CLEERS April 21, 2010


Download ppt "System Simulation for Aftertreatment University Perspective"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google