Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Matching Dairy Risk with Government Programs

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Matching Dairy Risk with Government Programs"— Presentation transcript:

1 Matching Dairy Risk with Government Programs
Ben Brown June 17, 2019

2 Federal Dairy Programs- Addressing the Need
Outline of Risk Management Options for Dairy Producers What conditions have occurred to create various government programs Private and Public Risk Management Options Self Insure Futures and Options Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC)- Old MPP Partnership with other producers through cooperatives Livestock Gross Margin Insurance- Dairy Dairy Revenue Protection Current market conditions and the impact of DMC Understanding the DMC Program Participation and election decisions of DMC Photo Credit- Ohio Farm Bureau

3 What does Strawberries have to do with Federal Dairy Programs
Photo Credit- Ozark Beauty

4 One word: Perception The old Margin Protection Program (MPP) was extremely unpopular with dairy producers Implication- The name had to be changed to Dairy Margin Coverage The farm bill started a refund of premiums paid into MPP for producers Federal Commodity Programs, whether they are dairy or crops, are expenses to tax payers The reality - there are more consumers than there are producers Some will say and are saying that there is too much money being allocated to dairy programs, others say it is not enough The increase in funding helps dairy producers financially now, but Is it enough to keep operations in business long term Will it encourage more production and thus drive down milk prices further without increases in demand

5 Federal Dairy Programs- Market Regulations
History of Federal Dairy Programs: Great Depression to Today MPP Dairy- revenue program that made payments when difference between feed and milk got to a certain coverage level. First Policy was Dairy Pricing Schemes- differing versions of flat and pooled prices Dairy Production Stabilization Act- reduced U.S. milk production. Import Quotas- restricted milk imports from overseas. 1937 1949 1980s 2002 1900 Today 2014 1951 1996 Stayed in Place till the U.S. enter the World Trade Organization. MILC- revenue program that made payments when income fell to low. Federal Milk Marketing Orders- classified pricing and revenue pooling. Still used today. Dairy Pricing Schemes created a higher U.S. price than world price so import restrictions were needed to prevent increases in import. However, this wasn’t put in until the 1950s effectively killing the viability of the pricing schemes. Milk processors would also hire dairies in times of short supply and fire dairies in times of excess supply creating uncertain conditions for risk. The Import Quotas of 1951 stayed in affect until 1996 when the U.S. entered the World Trade Organization allowing freer trade around the world. The Dairy Production Stabilization Act paid producers to reduce the production of their herd, however it increased production in herds that did not participate in the program. It did reduce production, but when the program ended production returned to the pre-program amount. There was also a plan in the 1980 to incentivize dairy export oversee. The Dairy Termination program or “whole heard buyout” program during the 1980s looked to remove milk from the market and increase price. It was expensive to the federal government, but did decrease supply and increase price. Import Quota Tariffs- restricted milk imports to a certain amount then tariffs on the additional amount. Still used today. DMC- enhanced version of MPP-Dairy. Milk Price Support Program- government bought milk off the market.

6 Federal Dairy Programs- Market Regulations
History of Federal Dairy Programs: Great Depression to Today MPP Dairy- revenue program that made payments when difference between feed and milk got to a certain coverage level. First Policy was Dairy Pricing Schemes- differing versions of flat and pooled prices Dairy Production Stabilization Act- reduced U.S. milk production. Import Quotas- restricted milk imports from oversees. 1937 1949 1980s 2002 1900 Today 2014 1951 1996 Stayed in Place till the U.S. enter the World Trade Organization. MILC- revenue program that made payments when income fell to low. Federal Milk Marketing Orders- classified pricing and revenue pooling. Still used today. Dairy Pricing Schemes created a higher U.S. price than world price so import restrictions were needed to prevent increases in import. However, this wasn’t put in until the 1950s effectively killing the viability of the pricing schemes. Milk processors would also hire dairies in times of short supply and fire dairies in times of excess supply creating uncertain conditions for risk. The Import Quotas of 1951 stayed in affect until 1996 when the U.S. entered the World Trade Organization allowing freer trade around the world. The Dairy Production Stabilization Act paid producers to reduce the production of their herd, however it increased production in herds that did not participate in the program. It did reduce production, but when the program ended production returned to the pre-program amount. There was also a plan in the 1980 to incentivize dairy export oversee. The Dairy Termination program or “whole heard buyout” program during the 1980s looked to remove milk from the market and increase price. It was expensive to the federal government, but did decrease supply and increase price. Import Quota Tariffs- restricted milk imports to a certain amount then tariffs on the additional amount. Still used today. DMC- enhanced version of MPP-Dairy. Milk Price Support Program- government bought milk off the market.

7 Economic Event- Policy Reaction
42% Drop in Milk Price Data Credit- USDA- NASS

8 Economic Event- Policy Reaction
Parity Price System: Taxes and Interest were rising quicker than milk prices. A Parity Price Ratio was introduced in 1946 Data Credit- USDA- NASS We still have price supports, but they are really just a fear based mechanism to get a new farm bill.

9 Economic Event- Policy Reaction
Data Credit- USDA- NASS

10 Collapse of Milk Prices in 80s Inflation Period
Data Credit- USDA- NASS

11 Economic Event- Policy Reaction
Large Purchases of Grain in the 80s and the WTO in 1996 changed Gov. purchases. Data Credit- Commodity Credit Corporation Annual Expenditure Reports

12 Milk Price “Volatility”- The New Threat
Uruguay Round Agreement Data Credit- USDA- NASS

13 Milk Price “Volatility”- The New Threat
Not unprecedented, but high. Clearly associated with elimination of government constraints on price. Calculated using data from USDA- NASS

14 Removal of Price Supports Increases Volatility but also Reveals Cycles
Prolonged Cycle Data Credit- USDA- NASS

15 Challenges to Price Volatility
Volatility- implies prices move around a bunch. Prices become hard to predict and usually have a larger downside. Traders love volatility because when there is movement in prices- there is money to be made. However, it is terrible to risk management plans for producers of the commodity. Characteristics of Risk Management Uncertainty/Certainty- good or bad, to what degree can I predict what the price will be? Instability/Stability- good or bad, price do or don’t change much from one period to the next. Inadequacy/Adequacy- stable or volatile, prices are enough to cover my costs and keep my liquidity ratios in tact? Credit to Andrew Novakovic, Cornell University

16 Global Markets- How they Impact Producers
The U.S. was a closed dairy economy until 1996. Consumers benefit from cheap dairy products and there are more of them. You can’t use an old price support system in a global market. Supporting U.S. dairy prices support the world price. When times are bad they are equally bad for everyone, but when times are good it’s a lot better for the large operations. Economies of scale are still prevalent in dairy operations.

17 Public Offering - Volatility Mitigation
The average of $8.24 was above highest margin coverage of $8 under MPP. Author Calculation using USDA- NASS, AMS and FSA Data

18 Dairy Revenue Protection
What is it? Private insurance product “It’s the crop insurance for milk” Where? Everywhere (in the U.S.) When? Traded every trading day (which is almost every day, when the market is closed (from 4pm to 9am) Slide Information- Marin Bozic, University of Minnesota Photo Credit- USDA-FSA

19 Dairy Revenue Protection
What is Protected? Revenue = Price x Quantity Which Price? Based on Federal Milk Marketing Order Prices It can be just on Fluid Milk Prices (Class III or Class IV) You can also protect against milkfat and protein contents. Which Quantity? Whatever coverage level you choose. It is assumed that the production risk is similar to state-level changes in milk per cow Quarterly Program not Monthly Slide Information- Marin Bozic, University of Minnesota Photo Credit- Progressive Dairyman

20 Effective Risk Management- Dairy RP
Hedge Frequently Hedge a Long Way Out- Now is not the time to Hedge Next Quarter Can only go out 5 quarters Quarterly Insurance Periods Policies Available Policies Not Available Calendar Year 2018 2019 2020 Policy Offerings Oct- Dec Jan-Mar Apr- Jun Jul- Sept Jan- Mar Jul- Sep Jul 1- Sept 15 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 Sept 16- Dec 15 Dec 15- Mar 15 Mar 16 – Jun 15 Jun 16- Jun 30 Information Source – USDA RMA

21 Effective Risk Management- Dairy RP
Slide Information- Marin Bozic, University of Minnesota

22 Effective Risk Management- Dairy RP
Slide Information- Marin Bozic, University of Minnesota

23 Summary- Risks in Dairy Prices
Dairy Policy has gone through major reforms since the first policies in the 1930s. Likely to go through many more until dairy policy finds a way to help producers manage liquidity instead of measures of profit There is a disconnect between what is needed and what has been provided Two Major Challenges Dairy Producers feel that they are victims of large price volatility Larger farms have historically handled the “cycles” better than others, resulting in farm declines and changes to the industry The old MPP and the new DMC might have found a sweet spot by providing MPP had the same thought as DMC, but with less money Income significant subsidies tailored for small sized operations Price and revenue risk well suited for large sized operations

24 This material is based upon work supported by the USDA-NIFA under Award Number and prepared by Ben Brown- The Ohio State University College of Food Agriculture and Environmental Sciences with reference of information to Andrew Novakovic at Cornell University and Mark Stephenson, Director of Dairy Policy Analysis at University of Wisconsin

25 The Dairy Margin Coverage Program
County Educator Best County in the State

26 Federal Dairy Programs- Addressing the Need
Outline of Risk Management Options for Dairy Producers What conditions have occurred to create various government programs Private and Public Risk Management Options Self Insure Futures and Options Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC)- Old MPP Partnership with other producers through cooperatives Livestock Gross Margin Insurance- Dairy Dairy Revenue Protection Current market conditions and the impact of DMC Understanding the DMC Program Participation and election decisions of DMC Photo Credit- Ohio Farm Bureau

27 The Mechanics of DMC Under the hood
If you lift up the hood and look in, the program mechanics are very similar to the Margin Protection Program. Same basic concept- based on margin between milk and feed prices Farms must choose a coverage level and pay the associated premium- higher coverage levels have a higher premium, but trigger more frequent. Can only cover a percent of historical production Most program functions were changed to make it more farmer-friendly. The one exception is that historical milk production was left the same as MPP. Photo Credit- American Dairy Association

28 DMC- Changes from MPP Coverage levels for Milk in Tier I
Added $8.50, $9.00, and $9.50 Changes to Tier I and Tier II Premiums (Lower for Tier I) Higher level of milk production coverage Did not change production history- still highest of 2011, 2012, or 2013 Ability to dual participate in the Livestock Gross Margin Program Review of Feed Costs Review of corn silage vs corn and the price of high quality alfalfa Cash Back or Premium Credit for Producers who enrolled under MPP

29 Production History- Stayed the Same
Producers will retain the SAME production history if they participated in MPP. This was the highest of 2011, 2012, or 2013 You will get to keep all the production “bumps” released by USDA There will be no more “bumps” in production history If you are a new operation since 2013, FSA will help you estimate your production history. If you’ve expanded in the last couple of years- it is still the same production history you had before. However……. Photo Credit- Dairy Processing Handbook

30 Amount of Milk Covered- Increased
Tier I Coverage increased from 4 million pounds to 5 million pounds. This change was made in the Budget Bill at the start of 2018 Producers can elect to cover a percentage of their historical production. Between 5% and 95% (Previously was 25%-90%) Photo Credit- American Dairy Association Mid-East

31 New Premiums and Coverage Levels
Tier 1 MPP-Dairy 2018 Tier 2 DMC Eligible Production 4 mil. lbs. or less 5 mil. lbs. or less Above 4 mil. lbs. Above 5 mil. lbs. $4.00 $0 $4.50 $0.0080 $0.0200 $0.0025 $5.00 $0.0190 $0.0400 $0.0050 $5.50 $0.0300 $0.0090 $0.1000 $6.00 $0.0410 $0.0160 $0.1550 $0.0500 $0.3100 $6.50 $0.0680 $0.2900 $0.0700 $0.6500 $7.00 $0.1630 $0.0630 $0.8300 $0.0800 $1.1070 $7.50 $0.2250 $0.0870 $1.03 $0.0900 $1.4130 $8.00 $0.4750 $0.1420 $1.36 $1.8130 $8.50 N.A. $0.1050 $9.00 $0.1100 $9.50 $0.1500 Taken from the Farm Service Agency release rules

32 Premiums- Graphically

33 Tier II- Graphically

34 Example: Buckeye Farms
Buckeye Farms has a Base Milk Production of 4,500,000 lbs. They Elect to cover 90% at $9.50 Coverage Level Covered Milk = (4,500,000 x 0.90)= 4,050,000 lbs. or 40,500 cwt The program assumes the same production each month (40,500/ 12) = 3,375 cwt. The differences between the U.S. all milk prices and feed prices for Jan. Feb. and Mar. are already know. January- $7.99, February- $8.22, and March - $8.85 Subtracting 9.50 from each and multiplying by 337,500 and adding up gets us the total payment thus far. January = $5,096, February = $4,320, and March = $2,194 Total = $11,610 Premium was $0.15 per cwt. ($0.15/cwt x 40,500)= $6,075

35 Objective: Avoid Tier II Coverage
For farms above 5 million pounds of historic production- choose a coverage level that gets you closest to 5 million pounds. 10 million pounds, choose 50% = 5 million pounds 23 million pounds, chose 20% = 4.6 million pounds Producers that select $8.00 coverage level or less in Tier I, then they MUST select the same coverage level in Tier II Producers that select $8.50 coverage level or above in Tier I, may select a different coverage level in Tier II. Photo Credit- Farm and Dairy

36 DMC- Strategy Coverage Level Tier 1 DMC Tier 2 Eligible Production 5 mil. lbs. or less Above 5 mil. lbs. $4.00 $0 $4.50 $0.0025 $5.00 $0.0050 $5.50 $0.0300 $0.1000 $6.00 $0.0500 $0.3100 $6.50 $0.0700 $0.6500 $7.00 $0.0800 $1.1070 $7.50 $0.0900 $1.4130 $8.00 $1.8130 $8.50 $0.1050 N.A. $9.00 $0.1100 $9.50 $0.1500 Tier I coverage is inexpensive at any level. Insure as much as you can. Above 5 million lbs.? Then pick a coverage level above $8 so you can do a lower on in Tier II. If above 5 million lbs, the $5 coverage level is the same as Tier I, but jumps 10 cents for $5.50 Big Jump

37 DMC-Discount for multi year enrollment
Option 1- Elect for annual sign-up. Option 2- Elect coverage once for all 5 years of the Farm Bill and receive a 25% discount on premiums. There are also discounts for rebates on old MPP premiums (difference between payment and premium for ( ) 75% of the difference if taken as a credit for DMC 50% of the difference if taken as cash Photo Credit- Morning Ag Clips

38 Does the New Coverage Levels Matter??
Author Calculations based on Data from USDA- NASS, AMS, and FSA

39 Does the New Coverage Levels Matter??
Author Calculations based on Data from USDA- NASS, AMS, and FSA

40 Concurrent Participation with LGM- Dairy
Could not do both under MPP. Low participation in Ohio last couple of years, but now more attractive. Photo Credit- USDA- RMA

41 DMC- Observations Futures, Options, Forward Cash Contracts, LGM-Dairy and Dairy RP are all tied to futures market sentiment Consider needs in liquidity Requires active management A marketing plan to take the emotion out is important DMC- A federal program that does not depend on future market sentiment Set it (maybe for five years) and forget about it Based on feed and milk prices that happened in the last month Photo Credit- Ohio Dairy Veterinarians

42 Questions? Photo Credit- Krauss Dairy, Ohio State University

43 This material is based upon work supported by the USDA-NIFA under Award Number and prepared by Ben Brown- The Ohio State University College of Food Agriculture and Environmental Sciences with reference of information to Andrew Novakovic at Cornell University and Mark Stephenson, Director of Dairy Policy Analysis at University of Wisconsin


Download ppt "Matching Dairy Risk with Government Programs"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google