1. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update 
James P. Toner, M.D., Ph.D., Charles C. Coddington, M.D., Kevin Doody, M.D., Brad Van Voorhis, M.D., David B. Seifer, M.D., G. David Ball, Ph.D., H.C.L.D., Barbara Luke, ScD, M.P.H., Ethan Wantman, M.B.A. 
Fertility and Sterility 
Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
DOI: /j.fertnstert
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
(A) Number of US assisted reproductive technology clinics that report to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or do not report, by year. (B) Total number of treatment cycles and live-born deliveries by year, inclusive of all assisted reproductive technology treatment types.
Fertility and Sterility  , DOI: ( /j.fertnstert )
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
(A) Live-born delivery rate in autologous cycles by year. As of 2002, outcomes were divided by fresh versus frozen embryo transfer. (B) Live-born delivery rates in autologous cycles by age of woman and year.
Fertility and Sterility  , DOI: ( /j.fertnstert )
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
(A) Mean number of embryos transferred in fresh autologous cycles by age of woman and year. (B) Percent of fresh transfers among autologous cycles that involved elective transfer of a single embryo by age of woman and year. (C) Percent of live-born deliveries among fresh autologous cycles that were twin, triplets, or more, by year.
Fertility and Sterility  , DOI: ( /j.fertnstert )
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 4
Percent of fresh autologous cycles in which specified complications were reported, by year.
Fertility and Sterility  , DOI: ( /j.fertnstert )
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions