1. Connected and automated mobility in CIVITAS cities
Bernard Gyergyay - Rupprecht Consult
CIVITAS Forum, Umea, Thursday 20 Sep 2018, 14:30 – 16:00
#H2020CoEXist
@H2020_CoEXist
How many own an automated vehicles? Many have used one? How my
The point I want to make here is that there are many uncertainties about this ‘unknown beast’

2. Automation Readiness in brief
Uncertainties for Local Authorities
Current hype creates unrealistic expectations
of the technology (pro-innovation bias)
(Connected) Infrastructure requirements are
not clearly formulated yet.
Long transition phase where conventional
vehicles coexist with partially and fully
automated vehicles.
Result: Automation not mentioned in strategic transport plans
Objective:
The mission of the H2020 CoEXist project is to systematically increase the capacity of local authorities and other urban mobility stakeholders to get ready for the transition towards a shared road network with increasing levels of connected and automated vehicles (CAVs)
Automation-Ready Framework:
Phase 1: Automation Awareness
Phase 2: Planning for Automation-readiness
Phase 3: Implementation of Automation-ready measures
This is álso the objective of the session

3. What is certain and what is not?
Uncertainties
Certainties
Overall mobility will increase
Benefits only gained from a future where:
Electric
Shared
Connected
Cooperative
Proactive planning
The challenge is to differentite between the certain and he uncertain
The worst reaction is inertia – „do nothing is not an option“
The more I learn about the topic, the more I am uncertain about it... I have worked intensively on the topic for three years now.

4. Planning for Automation Readiness
Policy screening: Liveability as top priority – how can CAVs contribute to it?
Reassessment of strategic mobility plans; incorporating new mobility forms
Mobility pricing for “SPAM” roaming cars
Is there a conflict between people friendly vs. automation friendly?
Preparation of physical and digital infrastructure
Modifications to infrastructure and accompanying traffic code
Engagement with citizens & support testing activities and research
Update travel demand models and evaluate road capacity needs
Assessment of required land use changes based on integrated land use and transport modelling tools
Try out level 1 & 2 functionalities
Identify new skill requirements – ‘less concrete more bytes’
Organisational restructuring for traffic management and public transport operations
Road authorities need to engage with OEMs
Back office for data exchange in traffic management
Defining data management responsibility with new management schemes
Policy
Infrastructure
Planning
Capacity Building
Traffic Management
Mobility Aspect
Planning for Automation Readiness
Implementation of Automation Ready Measures
Automation Awareness
Challenge: What measures can you take today?
Concrete measures today.
This is really nice menu of ideas that cities can do, also in a CIVITAS project

5. Planning for Automation Readiness
Implementation of Automation Ready Measures
Automation Awareness
European and
North-American citizens’
debate
Tifenn
Durand-Fleury, Missions
Publiques
Urbanism Next: Impacts
of Emerging Technology
on Cities.
Nico Larco,
University of Oregon
How to become an
‘Automation-aware’ city?
Mikael Ivar, City of Gothenburg
Gothenburg has already left the phase of automation awareness
The MAVEN project and
the ISA Initiative.
Tamara Goldsteen, City of Helmond

6. Take-up & Transfer Session
Innovative Modelling Approaches – Lessons from FLOW & CoEXist
16:30 – 18:00
Location: Oden
Capacity: 30 participants

7. Thank you for listening
#H2020CoEXist
@H2020_CoEXist
Bernard Gyergyay
The sole responsibility for the content of this document lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EASME nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.