Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Insulin Delivery Systems Atlanta Diabetes Associates

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Insulin Delivery Systems Atlanta Diabetes Associates"— Presentation transcript:

1 Insulin Delivery Systems Atlanta Diabetes Associates
New Insulins and Insulin Delivery Systems Bruce W. Bode, MD, FACE Atlanta Diabetes Associates Part 3

2 Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Indications
Title Subtitle Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Indications Significant hyperglycemia at presentation Hyperglycemia on maximal doses of oral agents Decompensation Acute injury, stress, infection, myocardial ischemia Severe hyperglycemia with ketonemia and/or ketonuria Uncontrolled weight loss Use of diabetogenic medications (eg, corticosteroids) Surgery Pregnancy

3 Starting With Basal Insulin in DM 2 Advantages
Title Subtitle Starting With Basal Insulin in DM 2 Advantages 1 injection with no mixing Insulin pens for increased acceptance Slow, safe, and simple titration Low dosage Effective improvement in glycemic control Limited weight gain INSULIN TACTICS Starting With Basal Insulin Advantages Patients who no longer respond adequately to oral agents will benefit from combination therapy that consists of maintaining the use of oral antidiabetic agents together with insulin therapy. The advantages of adding basal insulin to prior treatment with oral agents include the following: (1) only one insulin injection may be required each day, with no need for mixing different types of insulin; (2) the use of insulin pens can enhance patient acceptance of the treatment; (3) titration can be accomplished in a slow, safe, simple fashion; and (4) eventually combination therapy requires a lower total dose of insulin. The result is effective improvement in glycemic control while causing only limited weight gain. 6-37

4 Treatment to Target Study: NPH vs Glargine in DM2 patients on OHA
Add 10 units Basal insulin at bedtime (NPH or Glargine) Continue current oral agents Titrate insulin weekly to fasting BG < 100 mg/dL - if mg/dL, increase 2 units - if mg/dL, increase 4 units - if mg/dL, increase 6 units - if >180 mg/dL, increase 8 units

5 Treatment to Target Study; A1C Decrease

6 Treatment to Target Study: % at Goal
Title Subtitle Treatment to Target Study: % at Goal Results 57% of patients in both groups reached A1C 7% At wk 24, mean insulin glargine dose was higher than mean NPH insulin dose: Insulin glargine NPH insulin 48.8 IU/day IU/day , P<0.001 Treatment to Target Study: Timing and Frequency of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia This slide shows the results of a 24-week, multicenter, randomized, parallel study that evaluated the efficacy of bedtime NPH insulin vs. insulin glargine in restoring glycemic control to target A1C < 7.0% while continuing oral therapy and the timing and frequency of nocturnal hypoglycemia Rosenstock J, Riddle MC, and the HOE901/4002 Study Group. Diabetes 2002;51(suppl 2):A482. Abstract 1982-PO In 4002 at Endpoint- Basal Insulin dose (IU) Lantus N= mean 46.95, SD 26, Median 42, Min 1 , Max 144 NPH N= mean 41.72, SD 23.9, Median 38, Min 3, Max 138 Rosenstock J, Riddle M, HOE901/4002 Study Group. Diabetes 2002;51(suppl 2):A482. Abstract 1982-PO

7 Riddle et al, Diabetes June 2002, Abstract 457-p
Treat to Target Study: Glargine vs NPH Added to Oral Therapy of Type 2 Diabetes Nocturnal Hypoglycemia reduced by 40% in the Glargine group (532 events) vs NPH group (886 events) Riddle et al, Diabetes June 2002, Abstract 457-p

8 A1C Change From Baseline (%)
Title Subtitle Morning vs Bedtime Insulin Baseline: 9.11.0 Morning Glargine Bedtime Glargine Bedtime NPH -2 -1 A1C Change From Baseline (%) –1.24 –0.96 –0.84 P<0.001 P=0.008 A1C Change From Baseline A1C levels were reduced by –1.24% with morning insulin glargine, –0.96% with bedtime insulin glargine, and –0.84% with bedtime NPH insulin Improvement in A1C was more pronounced with morning insulin glargine than with bedtime insulin glargine (0.28%, P=0.008) or with bedtime NPH insulin (0.40%, P<0.001) Adapted from Fritsche A et al, and the 4001 Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 2003:138:952 Fritsche A et al, and the 4001 Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 2003:138:952

9 Starting with Bolus Insulin
16 obese Type 2 patients on NPH or Human 70/30 insulin twice daily randomized to: Insulin aspart premeal with metformin and rosiglitazone NPH or Human 70/30 twice daily Insulin titrated to 90 to 126 mg/dl at 1.5 hr post meal in the aspart group and premeal in the conventional group with goal A1C <7% Diabetes Care 2003

10 Insulin Aspart Premeal with Metformin and Rosiglitazone vs Conventional Insulin
A1C% 0.42 units/kg 3 kg weight gain 0.67 units/kg 1 kg weight gain

11 Advancing Basal/Bolus Insulin
Title Subtitle Advancing Basal/Bolus Insulin Indicated when FBG acceptable but A1C > 7% or > 6.5% and/or SMBG before dinner > 140 mg/dL Insulin options To glargine or NPH, add mealtime aspart / lispro To suppertime 70/30, add morning 70/30 Consider insulin pump therapy Oral agent options Usually stop sulfonylurea Continue metformin for weight control Continue glitazone for glycemic stability?


Download ppt "Insulin Delivery Systems Atlanta Diabetes Associates"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google