Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the replicons of the family Burkholderiaceae. An unrooted RAxML maximum ... Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the.

Published byΠλούτων Παπάγος Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the replicons of the family Burkholderiaceae. An unrooted RAxML maximum ... Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the."— Presentation transcript:

1 Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the replicons of the family Burkholderiaceae. An unrooted RAxML maximum ... Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the replicons of the family Burkholderiaceae. An unrooted RAxML maximum likelihood phylogeny of the replicons of the family Burkholderiaceae, based on the amino acid sequence of the ParB partitioning protein. Bootstrap values are based on 504 replicates. The scale represents the mean number of amino acid substitutions per site. The size of the triangles is proportional to the number of strains in the collapsed branch. The original expanded figure, the Newick formatted phylogeny, and the annotation file are available at github.com/diCenzo-GC/Burkholderiaceae_analyses. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Mol Biol Evol, Volume 36, Issue 3, 04 January 2019, Pages 562–574, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

2 Fig. 2. Genome organization within the family Burkholderiaceae
Fig. 2. Genome organization within the family Burkholderiaceae. An unrooted RAxML maximum likelihood phylogeny of Fig. 2. Genome organization within the family Burkholderiaceae. An unrooted RAxML maximum likelihood phylogeny of 293 Burkholderiaceae strains based on 28 highly conserved proteins (see supplementary information, Supplementary Material online). Bcc strains marked with an asterisks (*) contain genomic regions homologous to the chromosome, chromid, and megaplasmid, but with all or part of at least two of the replicons present as a cointegrant based on the assembly available through NCBI. Bootstrap values are based on 360 replicates. The scale represents the mean number of amino acid substitutions per site. The original figure, the Newick formatted phylogeny, and the annotation file are available at github.com/diCenzo-GC/Burkholderiaceae_analyses. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Mol Biol Evol, Volume 36, Issue 3, 04 January 2019, Pages 562–574, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

3 Fig. 1. Distribution of multipartite genomes in the β-proteobacteria
Fig. 1. Distribution of multipartite genomes in the β-proteobacteria. An unrooted RAxML maximum likelihood phylogeny ... Fig. 1. Distribution of multipartite genomes in the β-proteobacteria. An unrooted RAxML maximum likelihood phylogeny of 176 representative β-proteobacteria based on 26 highly conserved proteins (see supplementary information, Supplementary Material online). Species with a putative chromid may also contain a megaplasmid. The clade consisting of Candidatus Zinderia insecticola, Candidatus Nasuia deltocephalinicola, Candidatus Tremblaya princeps, and Candidatus Tremblaya phenacola was collapsed due to extremely long branch lengths. Bootstrap values are based on 108 replicates. The scale represents the mean number of amino acid substitutions per site. The original figure, the Newick formatted phylogeny, and the annotation file are available at github.com/diCenzo-GC/Burkholderiaceae_analyses. A phylogeny of all 960 β-proteobacteria is provided as supplementary figure S11, Supplementary Material online. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Mol Biol Evol, Volume 36, Issue 3, 04 January 2019, Pages 562–574, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

4 Fig. 4. Relationship between COG category abundances in replicon-specific accessory pangenomes. Scatterplots ... Fig. 4. Relationship between COG category abundances in replicon-specific accessory pangenomes. Scatterplots displaying the percentage of proteins in the accessory pangenome of chromids compared with that of chromosomes are shown. In both plots, the X-axes show the percentage of proteins in the chromosomal accessory genome annotated with a specific COG, whereas the Y-axes show the percentage of proteins in the chromid accessory genome annotated with a specific COG category. The dashed line indicates the 1:1 line. Each point in the plots represents a single COG category, and a few COG categories showing the greatest biases are indicated. The data underlying these plots are provided in supplementary Data Set S4, Supplementary Material online. The figures are shown for (A) all Burkholderia strains and (B) all Cupriavidus strains. See supplementary figure S7, Supplementary Material online, for similar plots for chromids and megaplasmids of the Burkholderia cepacia complex, the Paraburkholderia strains, and the Ralstonia strains. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Mol Biol Evol, Volume 36, Issue 3, 04 January 2019, Pages 562–574, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

5 Fig. 5. Accessory pangenome COG category abundances
Fig. 5. Accessory pangenome COG category abundances. Heatmaps displaying the relative abundance of proteins annotated ... Fig. 5. Accessory pangenome COG category abundances. Heatmaps displaying the relative abundance of proteins annotated with each COG category in the (A) chromosome pangenomes and (B) secondary replicon pangenomes are shown. Values shown are the percentage of proteins annotated with the COG category, divided by the average value for all samples shown in the heatmap. Only those COG categories with an unequal distribution between groups are shown, as determined with chi-square tests using 10 degrees of freedom and an unadjusted P value of (supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material online). Additionally, COG Category S (general functional prediction only) was excluded. Both axes were clustered with hierarchical clustering using average linkage and a Pearson correlation distance. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Mol Biol Evol, Volume 36, Issue 3, 04 January 2019, Pages 562–574, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

6 Fig. 6. Correlation between replicon and lifestyle functional biases
Fig. 6. Correlation between replicon and lifestyle functional biases. Plots display the chromosomal COG functional ... Fig. 6. Correlation between replicon and lifestyle functional biases. Plots display the chromosomal COG functional category abundance ratios for environmental genera versus pathogenic genera (X-axes), compared with the COG functional category abundance ratios for chromids versus chromosomes (Y-axes). The axes display the ratio of the percentage of proteins annotated with a COG category. Each point on the plots represents one COG category. COG abundance data are from the replicon-specific accessory genomes. Data points are limited to COG categories with an abundance of at least 0.5%. Lines represent the robust linear regression determined with the “rlm” command of the MASS package for R (Venables and Ripley 2002). (A) Data for Burkholderia and Paraburkholderia. (B) Data for Ralstonia and Cupriavidus. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Mol Biol Evol, Volume 36, Issue 3, 04 January 2019, Pages 562–574, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

7 Fig. 7. Ancestral state reconstruction of genome content
Fig. 7. Ancestral state reconstruction of genome content. A subtree of the phylogeny provided in figure 2 is shown, ... Fig. 7. Ancestral state reconstruction of genome content. A subtree of the phylogeny provided in figure 2 is shown, displaying the genera Cupriavidus and Ralstonia. At each node (space permitting), the number of genes found belonging to the chromosomal pangenome (bottom numbers) and the chromid pangenome (top numbers) of the extant strains that are predicted to have been present in that ancestor are indicated. The scale represents the mean number of amino acid substitutions per site. See supplementary figure S8, Supplementary Material online, for a version with taxa names, and for the data for the genera Burkholderia and Ralstonia. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Mol Biol Evol, Volume 36, Issue 3, 04 January 2019, Pages 562–574, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Download ppt "Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the replicons of the family Burkholderiaceae. An unrooted RAxML maximum ... Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the."

Similar presentations

Fig. 1. Genomic structure of the csd gene in A

Fig. 1. Genomic structure of the csd gene in A
Fig. 1. (A) Acclimated specific growth rates of Picochlorum species in media with varying salinity (10 mM–1.2 M). (B) Growth rates of P. oklahomensis and.

Fig. 1. (A) Acclimated specific growth rates of Picochlorum species in media with varying salinity (10 mM–1.2 M). (B) Growth rates of P. oklahomensis and.
Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal success of hatchling turtles as a function of the interaction between hatchling body ... Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal.

Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal success of hatchling turtles as a function of the interaction between hatchling body ... Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific.

Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific.
Figure 1 Data-selection process

Figure 1 Data-selection process
Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.
Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access

Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access
Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.

Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.
Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.

Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.
Figure 1. Colistin MIC distribution for the 153 colistin-resistant E

Figure 1. Colistin MIC distribution for the 153 colistin-resistant E
Figure 1. Linkage analyses of the SNPs in the MRE11 gene and haplotype blocks. Haplotype blocks were defined for all ... Figure 1. Linkage analyses of.

Figure 1. Linkage analyses of the SNPs in the MRE11 gene and haplotype blocks. Haplotype blocks were defined for all ... Figure 1. Linkage analyses of.
Figure 1. The 12 species in this study and details of the improved G4-seq method. (A) Phylogenetic representation of ... Figure 1. The 12 species in this.

Figure 1. The 12 species in this study and details of the improved G4-seq method. (A) Phylogenetic representation of ... Figure 1. The 12 species in this.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.

Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.
Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.

Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.
Figure 1 Maternal relatedness between calves and non-calf unit members correlates with babysitting rate. Relatedness ... Figure 1 Maternal relatedness.

Figure 1 Maternal relatedness between calves and non-calf unit members correlates with babysitting rate. Relatedness ... Figure 1 Maternal relatedness.
bDMARD: biologic DMARD.

bDMARD: biologic DMARD.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google