Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Consideration about Architecture related NGN Standards Chae-Sub, LEE

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Consideration about Architecture related NGN Standards Chae-Sub, LEE"— Presentation transcript:

1 Chae-Sub, LEE TTA chae-sub.lee@ties.itu.int
Consideration about Architecture related NGN Standards Chae-Sub, LEE TTA

2 Table of Contents Confusion and Problems Proposal
Architectural Study Pieces Confusion and Problems Proposal

3 Architectural Study Pieces
NGN Sub-Systems Architecture Overview Network & Service Control Transport

4 Architectural Study Pieces
NGN Control Architecture for session based Service Control Network Control Transport

5 Architectural Study Pieces
IMS Architecture Network & Service Control Access Transport

6 Architectural Study Pieces
Example of NGN realization Network & Service Control Transport

7 Architectural Study Pieces
Metro Ethernet 3G RAN ISC OSA SSF Presence PTT Mail Voice SMS MMS Streaming Converged Services and Platforms MRFC I-CSCF Legacy GMSC Converged Services IMS MGCF Converged Service Interfaces SGW PSTN PLMN MRFP S-CSCF P-CSCF PDF PS Backbone Network RNC SGSN Service Provider Data Network HA Broadcast Access Network DVB / ISDB-T RAN MSC/VLR PDG/ WAG BSC 2G RAN HSS AAA Network DBs Databases GGSN MGW WiFi Hotspot DNS DHCP IN Parlay SIP-AS WiMax RAN Transport Access HLR CS Backbone BGCF Public Internet (CDMA systems are similar to GPRS and UMTS systems shown) BMSC Core Transport (?) Service Control Wireless Access Transport

8 Confusion and Problems
Position of IMS : only for service control or more : IMS = Network Control + Service Control (?) Relationship IMS with underline Transport Capabilities : IMS only with xDSL, what else with Optic infrastructure Clarify Functional Entities among different Sub-Systems FRM would cover ‘Functional Entities’ for all suggested Sub-Systems, if not, what is total NGN Functional Architecture and how will develop NGN standard will include Transport aspects collaboration with SG 15 and other related SDOs such as xDSL Forum?

9 Proposal No more use of acronym ‘IMS’ to avoid any confusion
Change term IMS as IP_MS (‘IP Multimedia Sub-system’ need clarification of the meaning on ‘sub-system’) So NGN would have following Sub-systems : - IP_MS - NA_S (Network Attachment Sub-system) - RAC_S (Resource Admission Control Sub-system) - SCT_ES (Switched Circuit Technology Emulation Sub-system) - SS_S (Streaming Services Sub-system) Further clarification on positioning of above Sub-systems into Architecture Model : in Session control or call control or transport adaptation or transport


Download ppt "Consideration about Architecture related NGN Standards Chae-Sub, LEE"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google